Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.05581

Uniquely Ergodic Branching Subset Currents on Free and Surface Groups

Abstract

\emph{Subset currents} on free groups, on surface groups and, more generally, on word-hyperbolic groups, were introduced by Kapovich and Nagnibeda, and further studied by Sasaki. Subset currents extend ordinary geodesic currents and provide measure-theoretic generalizations of conjugacy classes of infinite quasiconvex subgroups. Their supports can be viewed as ``branching laminations". For free groups and surface groups, we construct non-rational subset currents with genuinely branching supports that carry no other subset currents except scalar multiples. For every nonabelian finite rank free group and every closed hyperbolic surface group, we show that such a current can be chosen so that its support is uncountable, is disjoint from the locus of two-point boundary subsets, and consists entirely of Cantor subsets of the boundary. More generally, we prove that every nonempty metrizable Choquet simplex occurs as a compact convex base for the cone of currents carried by a minimal genuinely branching subset lamination. The same universality phenomenon extends, apart from the usual rational-current terminology, to every non-elementary torsion-free hyperbolic group. We also study finite-pattern complexity. We prove that if $R_L(n)$ counts the allowed \emph{round patterns} of radius $n$ in a minimal subset lamination $L$, then $R_L(n)=O(n)$ forces the carried-current cone to be finite-dimensional, while infinite-dimensionality forces $R_L(n)/n\to\infty$; this universal threshold is sharp. We show that the coarse growth type of $R_L$ is independent of the chosen free basis and, more generally, of the chosen finite marked graph. We also show that a refined switch system recovers the exact dimension of the carried-current cone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ilya Kapovich. 2026-10-04. Uniquely Ergodic Branching Subset Currents on Free and Surface Groups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05581

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

JSJ splittings for all Artin groups

We prove that an Artin group splits over infinite cyclic subgroups if and only if its defining graph has a separating vertex, and explicitly construct a JSJ decomposition over infinite cyclic subgroups for all Artin groups. We then use these facts to show that, if two Artin groups are isomorphic, then they have the same set of parabolics supported on "big chunks", that is, maximal subgraphs without separating vertices. We also deduce acylindrical hyperbolicity for the automorphism groups of many Artin groups, partially answering a question of Genevois in the case of Artin groups. As a consequence, we produce new families of Artin groups with the R-infinity property.

math.GR↗

Supersoluble groups and the probability of generating a supersoluble subgroup

Let $G$ be a finite group and let $\mathrm{P}_{\mathcal{U}}(G)$ denote the probability that two randomly chosen elements of $G$ generate a supersoluble subgroup. We prove that if $\mathrm{P}_{\mathcal{U}}(G) > 16/25$ then $G$ is supersoluble, and that the bound $16/25$ is sharp, being attained by the group $G = (C_5 \times C_5) \rtimes Q_8$, where $Q_8$ acts faithfully and irreducibly on $C_5 \times C_5$.

math.GR↗

Separability of Subsets in Infinite Groups

We study the separability of subsets of an infinite group. Given an infinite group $G$ and subsets $A,B\subset G$, we say that $A$ and $B$ are separated in $G$ if there exists an infinite symmetric subset $X\subset G$ with $e\in X$ and $XAX\cap B=\varnothing$. Question 17.102 of the Kourovka Notebook raises a natural cardinal question: if $A$ and $B$ are disjoint and $|A|,|B|<|G|$, must they be separated? We first give a negative answer, constructing two essentially different families of counterexamples, based respectively on rigid binary relations and on torsion-free groups whose square sets have cardinality smaller than that of the group. On this basis we introduce the $W$-witness set $W_G(A,B)=\{g\in G:\{g,g^{-1}\}A\{g,g^{-1}\}\cap B=\varnothing\}$, obtain a necessary and a sufficient condition for separability given by its size, and study the critical range. The central result of this paper is a necessary and sufficient characterization of separability: taking the inverse pairs $\{g,g^{-1}\}$ as vertices, we construct the conflict graph $Γ_{A,B}$, and $A$ and $B$ are separated if and only if the associated graph contains an infinite independent set; separability is thereby converted into an ordinary graph-theoretic problem. From this we further derive the case of finite subsets, the case of Abelian groups, and several cardinal criteria, and we obtain, via Ramsey's theorem, a structural dichotomy for the non-separable case. In addition, we study the range of cardinalities of counterexample groups and the possible sizes of $W$-witness sets, and prove that no uniform necessary and sufficient criterion can depend only on $|A|$, $|B|$ and structural invariants of the group, independently of the specific position of $A$ and $B$.

math.GR↗