Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.05812

Feature identification for parameter extraction and defect detection using machine learning

Yan Guo·Helda Pahlavani·Artem Khachaturiants·Khalid Elsayed·Jakob van de Laar·Erik Simons·Niranjan Saikumar·Hamed Sadeghian
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Process control of advanced semiconductor nodes is not only pushing the limits of metrology equipment requirements in terms of resolution and throughput but also in terms of the richness of data to be extracted to enable engineers to finetune the process steps for increased yield. The move towards 3D structures requires extraction of critical dimension parameters from structures which can vary largely from layer to layer. For in-line process control, the necessary automation forces the development of layer and equipment-specific dedicated image processing algorithms. Similarly, with the increase in stochastic defects in the EUV era, detection of defects at the nm scale requires the identification of features captured in low resolution to meet the throughput requirements of HVM fabs, which can again lead to custom algorithm development. With the emergence of ML-based image processing methods, this process of algorithm development for both cases can be accelerated. In this work, we provide the general framework under which the images obtained from high-speed scanning probe microscopy-based systems can be used to train a network for either feature detection for parameter extraction or defect identification.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yan Guo, Helda Pahlavani, Artem Khachaturiants, Khalid Elsayed, Jakob van de Laar, Erik Simons, Niranjan Saikumar, Hamed Sadeghian. 2026-10-05. Feature identification for parameter extraction and defect detection using machine learning. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3011237

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

CHAOSMINING: Benchmarking Post-Hoc Attribution with Sparse Informative Features in High Dimensions

Post-hoc attribution is widely used to identify important model inputs, but evaluating whether these attributions identify truly informative features is difficult because real datasets rarely provide reliable ground truth. We introduce a multimodal benchmark containing symbolic tabular, vision, and audio tasks with known informative feature sets. In the main benchmark conditions, informative variables, spatial regions, or channels occupy fixed input coordinates while the remaining inputs provide irrelevant or distracting information. We use the benchmark to study how attribution quality depends on predictive performance, irrelevant-feature burden and structure, model configuration, and attribution mechanism, while separately measuring identification, stability, and computational cost. In most symbolic-data sweeps, informative-set identification co-varies with predictive performance, while the relative ordering of attribution methods remains largely stable. Across modalities, no method dominates all architectures and conditions, and greater attribution complexity does not consistently improve identification. Simple gradient attribution is often competitive at lower computational cost, while the vision and audio results show that architecture and the form of irrelevant content materially affect attribution quality.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

HardCore Generation: Generating Hard UNSAT Problems for Data Augmentation

Efficiently determining the satisfiability of a boolean equation -- known as the SAT problem for brevity -- is crucial in various industrial problems. Recently, the advent of deep learning methods has introduced significant potential for enhancing SAT solving. However, a major barrier to the advancement of this field has been the scarcity of large, realistic datasets. The majority of current public datasets are either randomly generated or extremely limited, containing only a few examples from unrelated problem families. These datasets are inadequate for meaningful training of deep learning methods. In light of this, researchers have started exploring generative techniques to create data that more accurately reflect SAT problems encountered in practical situations. These methods have so far suffered from either the inability to produce challenging SAT problems or time-scalability obstacles. In this paper we address both by identifying and manipulating the key contributors to a problem's ``hardness'', known as cores. Although some previous work has addressed cores, the time costs are unacceptably high due to the expense of traditional heuristic core detection techniques. We introduce a fast core detection procedure that uses a graph neural network. Our empirical results demonstrate that we can efficiently generate problems that remain hard to solve and retain key attributes of the original example problems. We show via experiment that the generated synthetic SAT problems can be used in a data augmentation setting to provide improved prediction of solver runtimes.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

How Vulnerable Is My Learned Policy? Universal Adversarial Perturbation Attacks On Modern Behavior Cloning Policies

Imitation learning, also known as learning from demonstrations, is a popular approach to train AI models; however, the vulnerability of these models to adversarial attacks remains underexplored. We present the first systematic study of adversarial attacks, across a range of both classic and recently proposed imitation learning algorithms, including Vanilla Behavior Cloning (Vanilla BC), LSTM-GMM, Implicit Behavior Cloning (IBC), Diffusion Policy (DP), and Vector-Quantized Behavior Transformer (VQ-BET). We study the vulnerability of these methods to white-box, grey-box and black-box adversarial perturbations. Our experiments reveal that most existing methods are highly vulnerable to these attacks, including black-box transfer attacks that transfer across algorithms. White-box attacks cause at least a 65% reduction in average task success across all evaluated tasks and algorithms, while the black-box transfer attacks reduce task success by up to 88% on Lift, 99% on Can, and 100% on Square. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study and compare the vulnerabilities of different popular imitation learning algorithms to both white-box and black-box attacks. Our findings highlight the vulnerabilities of modern imitation learning algorithms, paving the way for future work in addressing such limitations. Videos and code are available at https://sites.google.com/view/uap-attacks-on-bc.

cs.LG↗