Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.06740

Separating ClonableQMA and QCMA Relative to a Classical Oracle

Abstract

Since the introduction of the complexity class QMA as a quantum-verifier analogue of NP (Kitaev, 1997), many have wondered whether quantum proofs are necessary or classical proofs suffice - that is, whether QMA = QCMA or QCMA != QMA (Aharonov and Naveh, 2002; Aaronson and Kuperberg, CCC '07). This longstanding question was recently answered by works of Bostanci, Haferkamp, Nirkhe, and Zhandry (STOC '26) and Bostanci, Huang, and Vaikuntanathan (FOCS '26), which showed that quantum proofs are more powerful than classical ones in the classical-oracle setting. However, it remains unclear what exactly makes quantum proofs more powerful than classical ones. In the information-theoretic setting, a family of quantum states is not classicalizable if and only if it is unclonable. Indeed, these recent works also explicitly highlight the unclonability of their quantum proofs as a key mechanism behind their separations, and their arguments crucially rely on this property. This raises the question of whether unclonability is necessary for quantum proofs to be more powerful than classical ones. In this work, we show that even clonable quantum proofs can be more powerful than classical ones relative to a classical oracle by constructing a classical oracle O such that QCMA^O != ClonableQMA^O. This resolves the open question of Nehoran and Zhandry (ITCS '24), who established the analogous separation relative to a quantum oracle. We also show a classical-oracle separation between BQP/clonableqpoly and BQP/poly, and give applications of our results to quantum cryptography.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alper Cakan, Kai-Min Chung, Wei-Hsiang Hung, Tzu-Yi Yang. 2026-10-05. Separating ClonableQMA and QCMA Relative to a Classical Oracle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06740

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Spectral Certificates and Non-commutative Sum-of-Squares Lower Bounds for Hamiltonians

A central question in quantum many-body physics is estimating the ground energy of a $k$-local Hamiltonian system. In this work, we present a spectral technique for certifying a lower bound on the ground energy of a random $n$-qubit Hamiltonian system defined as the sum of signed $k$-local Pauli operators. In particular, we prove that for any constant $\ell$, there exists an efficiently computable length $n^{O(\ell)}$ certificate that is always a lower bound on the ground energy with the promise that, with high probability over the random Hamiltonian distribution, the certificate value is an $\varepsilon$-good approximation of the true ground energy when the number of terms is sufficiently large. Second, we show by construction that this technique, while successful on average over random Hamiltonian systems, can fail to produce good certificates on worst-case instances. Our spectral technique for producing these certificates comes from extending classical results on $k$-XOR refutations to $k$-local Pauli Hamiltonians by crafting a quantum variant of the Kikuchi matrix for CSP refutations. To show the limitations of this technique, we prove non-commutative Sum-of-Squares lower bounds for worst-case signed $k$-local Pauli operators. More generally, we explore how the non-commutative Sum-of-Squares relaxation can be understood as augmenting the standard Sum-of-Squares relaxation with the commutation relations between the Pauli operators. We instantiate the resulting framework with a modification to prior quantum code-based NLTS Hamiltonians that yields stronger complexity guarantees for the low-energy space; our Hamiltonian family satisfies simultaneously (1) $Ω(\log n)$-circuit depth lower bounds for all low-energy states, (2) constant-gap NP-hardness to approximate the ground energy, and (3) a constant-gap non-commutative Sum-of-Squares integrality gap up to $Ω(n)$-levels.

cs.CC↗

Exponential Quantum Advantage in Numbers-on-Forehead Communication

We give the first exponential quantum advantage in the general interactive three-party Numbers-on-Forehead (NOF) model for a decision problem. Previous separations hold only for restricted protocols like one-way communication for a relation. We construct an explicit partial Boolean function, the Interleaved Unitary Product problem, that requires only $O(\log n)$ NOF quantum communication but $\widetildeΩ(n^{1/32})$ randomized communication. This function builds on the two-party unitary product problem of Arunachalam, Girish, and Lifshitz (TQC 2024). The main technical obstacle is that discrepancy, the standard lower-bound method for NOF, also lower-bounds quantum communication. We instead develop a regularity-based argument for randomized NOF lower bounds, building on the approach of Kelley, Lovett, and Meka and adapting the regularity decomposition of Abboud, Fischer, Kelley, Lovett, and Meka (STOC 2024) to cylinder intersections. Combined with matrix-product estimates of Arunachalam, Girish, and Lifshitz, this yields our randomized lower bound.

cs.CC↗

Dimension Amplification for Tarski Fixed-Point Query Lower Bounds

We prove that finding a fixed point of a monotone map on the nine-dimensional grid $[N]^9$ requires $Ω((\log N)^3)$ deterministic queries, even when the fixed point is unique and each query returns the entire function value. The proof gives a construction that raises the dimension from $d$ to $4d+1$, preserves uniqueness, and adds a logarithmic factor to the lower bound. Iteration gives $Ω((\log N)^{r+2})$ queries in dimension $(7\cdot4^r-1)/3$, for every fixed nonnegative integer $r$, with an implicit constant that may depend on $r$. Consequently, no finite logarithmic exponent bounds the query complexity in all fixed dimensions.

cs.CC↗