Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.08160

Effects of Periodic Migration on Selection in Subdivided Populations

Abstract

Migration and selection jointly shape evolutionary outcomes in spatially structured populations. Migration can vary over time as ecological shifts, such as changes in sea level, alter habitat connectivity. Here, we study the impact of periodic migration on selection within a geographically subdivided population. Using a two-deme Moran model with spatially heterogeneous selection, we analyze a scenario in which a mutant genotype is advantageous in one habitat and disadvantageous in the other. Keeping the time-averaged migration rate fixed, we vary the period, relative phase, and directional asymmetry of migration and examine the resulting steady-state mutant frequency. We find that migration periodicity generally drives the population toward neutrality: relative to constant migration, it decreases the mutant frequency when mutants are advantageous on average and increases it when they are deleterious, without reversing the direction of selection in the parameter regimes examined. This effect is strongest for out-of-phase migration, which models seasonal migration, and is further enhanced by directional asymmetry. The response to the migration period is generally non-monotonic, with an intermediate characteristic period producing the largest deviation from constant-migration behavior under in-phase migration. These results arise from the coupling between migration and local selection in Moran process: temporal modulation of migration changes not only the exchange of individuals between habitats but also the local population composition on which selection acts. Our results show that populations with identical mean migration rates can show different evolutionary outcomes depending on the temporal organization of gene flow.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mohammad Amin Masoumi, Kamran Kaveh, Mohammad Reza Ejtehadi. 2026-10-06. Effects of Periodic Migration on Selection in Subdivided Populations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08160

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Cumulants, Moments and Selection

We first describe a fundamental connection between cumulants/moments and selection -- which follows intuitively when heterogeneity is added to Matlthus's population model. In doing so we provide an intuitive explanation of cumulants widely but incorrectly regarded as having no such interpretation. These fundamental relations are more general than Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection -- allowing for calculation of the standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis of fitness far into the future -- and are also more precise; indeed it becomes clear that Fisher's theorem is incorrect for fitness in the conventional/natural sense. Thanks to the close connection between selection and moments, a simple relation also exists between the moments of fitness and the moments of mutation -- at equilibrium and also over time; many biologically meaningful claims follow as logical consequences with connections to Haldane's load theory and a more general formula for coefficient of variation of fitness.

q-bio.PE↗

Mathematical statistics of wild mammal biomass

Using the recently published global census of the biomass of wild terrestrial mammals, we perform a detailed mathematical statistical analysis of its distribution over $N_s=4795$ species, drawing on tools developed in economics to characterize wealth inequality. We show that the Lorenz curve of the mammal biomass distribution is characterized by a large Gini coefficient $G=0.944$ exceeding the inequality reported for wealth distribution among world countries. This distribution is compared to the predictions of the Wealth Thermalization Hypothesis (WTH), in which species biomass values are treated as energy levels populated according to a Rayleigh-Jeans (RJ) steady-state distribution. We show that an RJ extended spectral model reproduces the real Lorenz and Pareto curves over four orders of magnitude of biomass variation, capturing the strong condensation of biomass among the rare, heavy-bodied species and its near-absence among the vast majority of light-bodied ones. These results extend the WTH framework, previously validated on distributions of human economic origin, to a biological distribution shaped by ecological and evolutionary constraints, and place the extreme rarity of large-bodied mammal species within the same statistical mathematical description as the oligarchic concentration of wealth in human societies. We finally discuss possible ecological mechanisms that may contribute to the observed distribution, including interspecific interactions, food availability, and competition.

q-bio.PE↗

Stochasticity and Environmental Switching Shape Quorum Sensing Evolution in Bacterial Populations

Quorum sensing (QS) is classically understood as a mechanism by which bacterial cells sense their own density, but environmental fluctuations make any single cell's estimate unreliable. An alternative view holds that populations pool individual estimates to reach reliable collective decisions. We investigate how a two-autoinducer toggle switch network enables this collective adaptation in fluctuating environments. At the single-cell level, the toggle switch is bistable. Membrane permeability controls autoinducer secretion and is the evolving trait. Using an individual-based model of a spatially structured population, we show that permeability evolves through a collective mechanism. Environmental frequency is the primary determinant of evolutionary outcome. Under strong asymmetry, the dominant trait reaches a high plateau. The trait linked to the rare environment stays low. It rises smoothly as its environment becomes more frequent. Total permeability stays close to a fixed budget; environmental frequency mainly sets how it is split between the two traits. When the two environments are equally frequent, no single trait wins. Both traits coexist, and noise asymmetry between the two sensing channels biases the levels at which they coexist rather than selecting a winner. Coexistence is also the slowest outcome to reach. Higher noise speeds adaptation, but the evolved permeability is non-monotonic in noise, peaking at an intermediate value. Earlier work found that more noise favors collective sensing as long as cells are correct on average. We develop a two-trait adaptive-dynamics model that unifies these regimes. Away from symmetry, it reduces to a closed one-dimensional equation that captures the individual-based results. At symmetry, weak cross-repression gives a single coexistence attractor, consistent with replicate populations maintaining both traits.

q-bio.PE↗