Kriging and Gaussian processes: interconnected frameworks for spatial modelling and prediction

Hossein Mohammadi

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.10783

Kriging and Gaussian processes: interconnected frameworks for spatial modelling and prediction

Hossein Mohammadi

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Spatial modelling and inference arise across many areas of science and engineering, with Kriging and Gaussian process (GP) regression serving as two widely used predictive models. Although grounded in the same random field theory, these approaches are often treated in isolation. As a result, their connection has been obscured by differences in terminology, notation, and practical implementation. This separation largely reflects their independent development within geostatistics and machine learning, respectively. To bridge this methodological divide, this work establishes a unified mathematical framework that connects the two paradigms. The underlying assumptions and formulations of each approach are detailed and compared within this framework. This comparison highlights their differences while clarifying the connections between them. The resulting perspective provides practitioners with a common foundation for translating concepts and methods between geostatistics and machine learning. In particular, it makes methodological developments in either field more accessible to the other, including advances in uncertainty quantification from the GP literature.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Hossein Mohammadi. 2026-10-07. Kriging and Gaussian processes: interconnected frameworks for spatial modelling and prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10783

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Comparison of Bayesian methods for extrapolation of treatment effects: a simulation study

Extrapolating treatment effects from related studies is a promising strategy for designing and analyzing clinical trials in situations where achieving an adequate sample size is challenging. Bayesian methods are well-suited for this purpose, as they enable the synthesis of prior information through the use of prior distributions. While the operating characteristics of Bayesian approaches for borrowing data from control arms have been extensively studied, methods that borrow treatment effects--quantities derived from the comparison between two arms--remain less well understood. In this paper, we present the findings of an extensive simulation study designed to address this gap, across six clinically motivated case studies covering continuous, binary, recurrent-event, and time-to-event endpoints. We varied target sample size, treatment-effect drift, and endpoint-specific design assumptions. Power and estimation performance were compared using a frequentist analysis of the target data alone, calibrated to the same actual type I error rate. Our results provide insights into the strengths and limitations of existing methods in the context of confirmatory trials. At matched actual type I error rates, power differences were usually small, with occasional gains over the reference analysis and larger losses for some adaptive procedures. Borrowing reduced MSE when source and target effects were consistent, but increasing drift eroded this benefit and could substantially reduce interval coverage. Commensurate priors with appropriately chosen hyperpriors offered the most favorable balance between estimation gains and robustness to conflict. The conditional power prior was competitive for estimation at comparable type I error rates, despite its lack of adaptation. Test-then-pool procedures often performed poorly. No method dominated across all criteria.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Efficiently Computed Marginal Likelihoods for Multivariate Mixture Models

We propose a new methodology for efficiently computing marginal likelihoods for univariate and multivariate mixture models. The estimator that this methodology proposes computes the marginal likelihood from Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples, is consistent, asymptotically normal and of finite variance. In addition, it is invariant to label switching, does not require posterior samples from hidden allocation vectors, and is efficiently approximated, even for an arbitrarily high number of components. Its computational efficiency is based on an asymptotically optimal ordering of the parameter space, which can in turn be used to provide useful visualisations. We test it in simulation settings where the true marginal likelihood is available analytically. It performs well against state-of-the-art competitors, even in multivariate settings with a high number of components. We demonstrate its utility for inference and model selection on univariate and multivariate data sets.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Asymmetric Space-Time Covariance Functions via Hierarchical Mixtures

This work is focused on constructing space-time covariance functions through a hierarchical mixture approach that can serve as building blocks for capturing complex dependency structures. This approach provides a unifying modeling framework that not only constructs a new class of asymmetric space-time covariance functions with closed-form expressions, but also provides corresponding space-time process representations, which further unify constructions for several existing space-time covariance models. This hierarchical mixture framework decomposes the complexity of model specification at different levels of hierarchy, for which parsimonious covariance models can be specified with simple mixing measures to yield flexible properties and closed forms. A characterization theorem is provided to study how the mixing measures determine the statistical properties of covariance functions. Several new covariance models resulting from this framework are discussed in terms of their practical usefulness. This hierarchical mixture approach is extended for nonstationary and multivariate settings. A theorem is also provided to construct valid asymmetric space-time covariance functions with arbitrary and possibly different degrees of smoothness and long-range dependence in space and in time. This generalized class also bridges a theoretical gap in using the Lagrangian reference framework. The superior performance of several new parsimonious covariance models over existing models is verified with the well-known Irish wind data and the U.S. air temperature data.

stat.ME↗