Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.11039

Rendering-Free Lookahead for Question-Guided Active Vision

Koya Sakamoto·Daichi Azuma·Shuhei Kurita·Naoya Chiba·Yusuke Iwasawa·Yutaka Matsuo·Taiki Miyanishi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Active robot vision requires controlling the camera to reveal task-relevant information that is hidden from the current viewpoint. For example, determining what is inside a box may require raising the camera and looking down into it. For viewpoint-dependent question answering, the challenge is to select camera motions that expose the visual evidence needed to answer the question. Although vision-language models (VLMs) can interpret observed images, selecting such motions requires anticipating the usefulness of unseen views. We quantify this usefulness as answerability, a VLM's estimate that a view suffices to answer the question, and present Rendering-Free Lookahead (RFL), a viewpoint-selection policy that ranks candidate camera motions by predicted future answerability. RFL transfers visual lookahead from deployment to offline training. At training, a privileged teacher renders candidate future views in 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) scenes and uses a frozen VLM to compute one- and two-step answerability targets. Through two-stage distillation, a student learns to predict these action values from the question, recent visual observations, and a candidate camera motion. At deployment, RFL uses these predicted values to select camera motions without rendering future views. On 377 E3VS-Bench test episodes in unseen environments, RFL improves the mean judge score by 43\% over a direct-action baseline using the same VLM. These results support learning camera-control policies from privileged visual lookahead for viewpoint-dependent question answering.

Explore related subjects

cs.CVcs.RO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Koya Sakamoto, Daichi Azuma, Shuhei Kurita, Naoya Chiba, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Taiki Miyanishi. 2026-10-08. Rendering-Free Lookahead for Question-Guided Active Vision. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11039

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bilateral Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Flatter Minima

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) enhances generalization by reducing a Max-Sharpness (MaxS). Despite the practical success, we empirically found that the MAxS behind SAM's generalization enhancements face the "Flatness Indicator Problem" (FIP), where SAM only considers the flatness in the direction of gradient ascent, resulting in a next minimization region that is not sufficiently flat. A better Flatness Indicator (FI) would bring a better generalization of neural networks. Because SAM is a greedy search method in nature. In this paper, we propose to utilize the difference between the training loss and the minimum loss over the neighborhood surrounding the current weight, which we denote as Min-Sharpness (MinS). By merging MaxS and MinS, we created a better FI that indicates a flatter direction during the optimization. Specially, we combine this FI with SAM into the proposed Bilateral SAM (BSAM) which finds a more flatter minimum than that of SAM. The theoretical analysis proves that BSAM converges to local minima. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BSAM offers superior generalization performance and robustness compared to vanilla SAM across various tasks, i.e., classification, transfer learning, human pose estimation, and network quantization.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Understanding Transformer-Based Vision Models via Modular Feature Inversion

Understanding the internal mechanisms of deep neural networks remains a central challenge in machine learning. In computer vision, one promising yet only preliminarily explored approach is feature inversion via inverse networks, which reconstructs images from intermediate representations using trained inverse networks. In this study, we revisit feature inversion via inverse networks, introducing a novel, modular variant that enables a computationally more efficient application of the technique while, in some cases, producing semantically more coherent image reconstructions. We apply our method to large-scale transformer-based vision models, specifically Detection Transformer, Vision Transformer, Swin Transformer, and Data-Efficient Image Transformer, analyzing the resulting reconstructions across network depth. Our main analysis compares Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, which exhibit the most informative differences among the evaluated architectures. At the same time, results for Swin Transformer and Data-Efficient Image Transformer support the broader applicability of our framework. Our findings reveal gradual representational changes across transformer layers as a shared characteristic of Detection Transformer and Vision Transformer, as well as systematic differences in how they preserve contextual shape and fine-grained image details, and in their robustness to color perturbations. These findings deepen understanding of transformer-based vision models and demonstrate the utility of modular feature inversion as an interpretability tool.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs

Humans develop perception through a bottom-up hierarchy: from basic primitives and Gestalt principles to high-level semantics. Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are trained directly on complex downstream tasks. Does it guarantee their performance on these foundational visual capabilities? To systematically investigate this gap, we introduce VisFacor, a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from FRCT, a well-established cognitive psychology assessment spanning four domains of human visual cognition. Furthermore, we design algorithms to automatically construct and validate unlimited test cases with controllable difficulty. Using VisFacor, we evaluate 39 frontier MLLMs, including both proprietary (e.g., GPT, Gemini) and open-source (e.g., LLaMA, Qwen) models. The best model achieves a score of only 55.9%. Analysis reveals good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and construct validity (compared to existing vision benchmarks). Models consistently fail on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination, regardless of model size or prompting strategy. These findings suggest that performance improvements on existing general benchmarks might represent castles in the air instead of a genuine mastery of human-like visual cognition.

cs.CV↗