Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.12912

Product and Quotient Set Dominance in Finite Groups

Abstract

A classic problem in additive number theory asks whether a given subset of integers has more sums or differences. This inquiry naturally extends to finite groups, where one compares the sizes of the product set $AA$ and the quotient set $AA^{-1}$ for a subset $A \subseteq G$. A finite group is considered product-dominant if it contains a higher proportion of subsets where $|AA| > |AA^{-1}|$, and quotient-dominant if the reverse is true. We establish statistical criteria to determine the dominance behavior of large finite groups by analyzing the moments of the random variable $d(A) := |AA| - |AA^{-1}|$. By translating product and quotient relationships into graph-theoretic constructions, we compute these moments through counting independent sets. Our main result demonstrates that for a growing sequence of finite groups $G_k$ with center size $Z_k$ and involution count $T_k$, the condition $Z_k = o(T_k)$ implies the groups are eventually product-dominant. Conversely, if $T_k \cdot \sqrt{3}^{R_k/Z_k} = o(Z_k)$ (where $R_k$ denotes the number of elements whose square is central), the groups are eventually quotient-dominant. Using these asymptotic conditions, we resolve the Miller--Vissuet conjecture by proving that all dihedral groups $D_n$ for $n \geq 3$ are product-dominant. Furthermore, we classify the dominance behavior of several major families of groups, proving that symmetric groups and non-abelian finite simple groups are product-dominant, while groups of odd order and certain abelian groups are quotient-dominant. Finally, for groups that fall outside our asymptotic conditions, we derive an explicit formula for the first moment utilizing the irreducible characters and conjugacy classes of the group.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuval Amit, Lucas Chen, Christopher Housholder, Joshua Im, Joshua Khan, Steven J. Miller, Mateo Palomares, Devayani Pradhan. 2026-10-09. Product and Quotient Set Dominance in Finite Groups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12912

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Co-rank $1$ Arithmetic Siegel--Weil III: Geometric local-to-global

This is the third in a sequence of four papers, where we prove the arithmetic Siegel--Weil formula in co-rank $1$ for Kudla--Rapoport special cycles on exotic smooth integral models of unitary Shimura varieties of arbitrarily large even arithmetic dimension. Our arithmetic Siegel--Weil formula implies that degrees of Kudla--Rapoport arithmetic special $1$-cycles are encoded in the first derivatives of unitary Eisenstein series Fourier coefficients. In this paper, we make the reduction from global arithmetic intersection numbers for special cycles to the local geometric quantities in our companion papers. Building on our previous companion papers, we also propose a construction for arithmetic special cycle classes associated to possibly singular matrices of arbitrary co-rank.

math.NT↗

Co-rank $1$ Arithmetic Siegel--Weil IV: Analytic local-to-global

This is the fourth in a sequence of four papers, where we prove the arithmetic Siegel--Weil formula in co-rank $1$ for Kudla--Rapoport special cycles on exotic smooth integral models of unitary Shimura varieties of arbitrarily large even arithmetic dimension. Our arithmetic Siegel--Weil formula implies that degrees of Kudla--Rapoport arithmetic special $1$-cycles are encoded in the first derivatives of unitary Eisenstein series Fourier coefficients. In this paper, we pin down precise normalizations for some $U(m,m)$ Siegel Eisenstein series, give local Siegel--Weil special value formulas with explicit constants, and record a geometric Siegel--Weil result for degrees of complex $0$-cycles. Using this, we complete the proof of our arithmetic Siegel--Weil results by patching together the local main theorems from our companion papers.

math.NT↗

Sub-Weyl bound for $GL(2)$ via trivial delta

For a $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ form $f$, we obtain the sub-Weyl bound \begin{equation*} L(1/2+it,f)\ll_{f,\varepsilon} t^{1/3-δ+\varepsilon}, \end{equation*} where $δ=1/174$, thereby crossing the Weyl barrier for the first time beyond $GL(1)$. The proof uses a refinement of the `trivial' delta method.

math.NT↗