Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.13696

Differences among preparatory processes preceding major earthquakes in Kamchatka, 2014-2025, including the MW 8.8 event

Stanislaw Lasocki·Beata Orlecka-Sikora·Mateusz Olszewski
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Earthquake preparation involves progressive damage accumulation, strain localization, and changes in the organization of seismicity. We investigate preparatory processes preceding seven episodes of major earthquakes in the Kuril - Kamchatka subduction zone during 2014 - 2025, including the 29 July 2025 MW 8.8 Kamchatka megathrust earthquake. We track damage evolution using the seismic regularity coefficient dc and seismic strain dynamics coefficient SSD, defined for seismic series. Before 2022, each episode of strong seismicity was preceded by a pronounced dc minimum, commonly accompanied by an SSD minimum, followed by an increase in dc toward a maximum near the strong event or event group. After 2022, dc minima became shallower and were superimposed on a sustained upward trend. We interpret this transition as evidence that the metrics recorded two superimposed processes. The cycles before 2022 reflect complete strain-localization histories on southern or more distant structures that did not contribute to the segment ruptured in 2025. In contrast, the upward dc trend from 2022, with only shallow minima preceding Episodes 6 and 7, marks coupled behavior within the eventual main rupture segment, also influenced by stress transfer from southern source regions.

Explore related subjects

physics.geo-phphysics.data-an

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stanislaw Lasocki, Beata Orlecka-Sikora, Mateusz Olszewski. 2026-10-09. Differences among preparatory processes preceding major earthquakes in Kamchatka, 2014-2025, including the MW 8.8 event. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13696

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Latent Diffusion Modeling of Two- and Three-dimensional Fracture Networks with Sparse Observation Conditioning

Characterizing subsurface fracture networks is challenging because geometry and connectivity are sparsely observed and uncertain away from measurements. We develop a latent diffusion framework for unconditional and observation-conditioned generation of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fracture networks. Fractures and the surrounding matrix are represented as binary fields and compressed by a variational autoencoder into compact spatial latent representations, where an Elucidated Diffusion Model learns their distribution. The 3D model operates on native volumetric fields, with a reconstruction objective designed to preserve sparse, thin fracture structures. Sparse borehole observations are incorporated through a conditioning encoder, classifier-free guidance, and diffusion posterior sampling. Generated ensembles reproduce key fracture-network statistics, including fracture area/volume fraction, two-point correlation, and chord-length distributions. Reconstructed fracture counts and gas-production responses are comparable to those of the reference networks under the considered multiphase flow scenarios. Conditional generation satisfies 99.6% of prescribed well observations in 2D. In 3D, where vertical boreholes constrain full voxel columns, conditional realizations satisfy 84.2% of observed well voxels while maintaining fracture volume and geometry comparable to the reference ensemble. These results demonstrate the potential of latent diffusion models as compact probabilistic representations for fracture-network characterization, ensemble generation, and sparse-observation conditioning.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Is the Number of Foreshocks Underestimated? The Role of Declustering Symmetry

The physical origin of foreshocks remains one of the major unresolved problems in statistical seismology. In bottom-up (BU) triggering models, foreshocks are interpreted as ordinary earthquakes that stochastically trigger a larger event through cascading interactions, as in the Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model. In contrast, top-down (TD) models interpret foreshocks as manifestations of a preparatory process preceding the mainshock. This ambiguity has important implications not only for earthquake forecasting, but also for declustering itself, since the inferred number of foreshocks may depend on the assumed physical mechanism governing seismicity. Here we investigate the detectability of foreshocks using synthetic catalogues representing two limiting physical scenarios: purely bottom-up triggering and mixed preparatory-triggering dynamics. These cases are implemented through the ETAS and ETAFS models, respectively. We compare the classical nearest-neighbor (NN) declustering metric with a reverse nearest-neighbor metric (rNN) introduced here. While the standard NN metric scales the correlation metric to the magnitude of the earlier event, rNN scales it with the magnitude of the later event. We show that rNN is mathematically equivalent to applying the standard nearest-neighbor metric to the time-reversed catalog, establishing a direct symmetry between the two approaches. Our simulations reveal [...]

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Is Earthquake Replenishment Sufficient for Unbiased b-Value Estimation?

Short-term aftershock incompleteness biases Gutenberg-Richter b-value estimates because many small earthquakes remain undetected immediately after large events. Two strategies address this problem. Earthquake replenishment reconstructs missing events to restore a more complete catalog, whereas robust positive-difference estimators infer the b-value directly from incomplete observations. Whether these approaches provide equivalent information on the magnitude distribution remains open. We address this issue using synthetic aftershock sequences generated with the Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model and degraded through a time- and magnitude-dependent incompleteness model. Incomplete catalogs are replenished using AutoBETA, and b is estimated using the standard maximum-likelihood, b-more-positive, and b-more-incomplete estimators. Replenishment reconstructs the overall structure of the missing-event population and substantially improves conventional maximum-likelihood estimates, although small residual biases remain. By contrast, both positive-difference estimators recover the imposed b-value directly from incomplete synthetic catalogs. Applications to the Ridgecrest, Landers, and Hector Mine sequences show that b-more-incomplete is less sensitive to replenishment than b-more-positive. Ten independent replenishment seeds indicate that seedto-seed variability is small relative to differences among estimators. Replenishment and robust b-value estimation therefore address different aspects of catalog incompleteness: replenishment provides a more complete aftershock representation, whereas robust estimators are preferable when accurate b-value estimation is the primary objective.

physics.geo-ph↗