Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.15268

Moment-Calibrated Conformal Prediction with Side Information

Abstract

For a fixed conformal score function, standard split conformal prediction calibrates a prediction set using the empirical distribution of the conformal scores, without using available side information about the data. We propose a moment-calibrated approach that uses such information to reduce variability across calibration data sets. Side information involving the covariates, the response, or both is expressed as moment restrictions, which are enforced through empirical likelihood weights on the calibration data points. The resulting weighted empirical distribution of the scores determines the weighted empirical quantile without changing the score function. We establish finite-sample bounds on training-conditional and marginal coverage of the moment-calibrated prediction set. We derive asymptotic distributions for training-conditional coverage and average prediction-set size, show that their asymptotic variances are no larger than the corresponding variances under standard split conformal prediction, and characterize when the reductions are strict. In the semi-supervised setting, we identify an optimal moment function of a given covariate representation, develop implementations using prespecified moment functions or a function learned by cross-fitting, and quantify the effect of the unlabeled sample size. We also extend the method to coverage conditions indexed by a class of functions of the covariates through weighted quantile regression. Numerical studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Guanghui Wang, Liuhua Peng, Liu Liu, Changliang Zou. 2026-10-11. Moment-Calibrated Conformal Prediction with Side Information. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15268

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Assumption-Lean Differential Variance Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Detection

The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is frequently estimated in clinical studies to refute a homogeneous treatment effect hypothesis. Under this regime, all patients making up the population experience identical benefit from a given treatment relative to a comparator. Uncovering heterogeneous treatment effects through inference about the CATE, however, requires that covariates truly modifying the treatment effect be reliably collected at baseline. CATE-based techniques will necessarily fail to detect violations when effect modifiers are omitted from the data due to, for example, resource constraints. Severe measurement error has a similar impact. Clinical decision makers can be misled as a result. To address these limitations, we prove that a practical homogeneous treatment effect hypothesis can be gauged through inference about contrasts of the potential outcomes' variances even when effect modifiers are missing from the data. We derive causal machine learning estimators of these contrasts and study their asymptotic properties. We establish that these estimators are doubly robust and asymptotically linear under mild conditions, permitting formal hypothesis testing about treatment effect heterogeneity. Numerical experiments demonstrate that these estimators' asymptotic guarantees are approximately achieved in finite-sample randomized and observational study data alike. These inference procedures are then used to detect heterogeneous treatment effects in the re-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating targeted temperature management in cardiac arrest patients.

stat.ME↗

Estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in clustered data with an application to analyzing caries and periodontal disease data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

The within-cluster subgroup composition of units can inform on the marginal distribution of those units outcomes, denoted informative subgroup size (ISS). Moreover, within-cluster subgroup composition of paired outcomes can allow one outcome to inform upon the marginal distribution of the other. If this type of ISS ignored, it can bias marginal association estimates by allowing subgroup composition to influence how clusters contribute to the analysis. We develop two weighting approaches for estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in this setting. The weights are derived using within-cluster resampling arguments and extend conventional cluster weighting to paired response subgroups. We adapt an existing test of marginal dependence to assess ISS by examining this subgroup structure in both directions. In simulated data exhibiting this bidirectional ISS, pair-based weighting reduced bias when association was primarily carried through the paired observations. These weights also allow scientifically or clinically meaningful dichotomizations to enter directly into the weighting scheme, with the choice of subgroup definition further improving estimation in several simulated settings. Application to NHANES oral-health data showed strong evidence of ISS for filled-surface outcomes across subgroups defined by clinical attachment loss and pocket depth, with the corresponding periodontal--caries associations generally small and positive. These methods provide a practical approach for estimating marginal association when paired subgroup composition is informative.

stat.ME↗

Functional Principal Component Analysis for Manifold-Indexed Data

Functional principal component analysis has traditionally focused on processes indexed by Euclidean domains, although functional observations increasingly arise on curved domains. We develop FPCA for real-valued processes observed with noise at discrete locations on a general Riemannian manifold. We estimate the mean and covariance functions using intrinsic kernel smoothing based on geodesic distance and a normal-coordinate volume correction, with a general weighting scheme accommodating unequal numbers of observations across subjects. We establish $L^2$ and uniform convergence rates for these estimators and derive corresponding error bounds for the estimated eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. These results quantify how manifold dimension, sampling frequency and weighting affect estimation accuracy and characterize the phase transition between sparse and dense sampling regimes. Simulation studies on the circle and sphere, together with real-data applications, illustrate the finite-sample performance of the proposed methodology.

stat.ME↗