Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.15484

Toward Explainability in Multimodal Recommendation

Abstract

Multimodal recommender systems effectively alleviate data sparsity and cold-start problems by integrating heterogeneous information, yet complex cross-modal representations and model decision-making processes also introduce new interpretability challenges. Despite the rapid growth of research on the interpretability of multimodal recommendation in recent years, relevant methods and evaluation criteria remain relatively fragmented, lacking a unified conceptual framework. To address this gap, this paper categorizes existing methods into modality explanation and post-hoc explanation based on the timing and manner of explanation generation, and further constructs a progressive system for each category. Building on this foundation, this paper synthesizes four categories of evaluation metrics from both objective quantitative and subjective perceptual perspectives, and reviews relevant datasets along the dimensions of application domain and data source. Through a comprehensive analysis of existing research, we further propose future research directions. This paper aims to establish a unified analytical perspective across multimodal representation, recommendation decision-making, and user preferences, providing a research foundation for building transparent and trustworthy multimodal recommender systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chen Liang, Jinghui Li, Xiuze Zhou, Zongyue Wang, Yuanguo Lin, Han Yu. 2026-10-11. Toward Explainability in Multimodal Recommendation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15484

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

LLMRec: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Recommendation Task

Recently, the fast development of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT has significantly advanced NLP tasks by enhancing the capabilities of conversational models. However, the application of LLMs in the recommendation domain has not been thoroughly investigated. To bridge this gap, we propose LLMRec, a LLM-based recommender system designed for benchmarking LLMs on various recommendation tasks. Specifically, we benchmark several popular off-the-shelf LLMs, such as ChatGPT, LLaMA, ChatGLM, on five recommendation tasks, including rating prediction, sequential recommendation, direct recommendation, explanation generation, and review summarization. Furthermore, we investigate the effectiveness of supervised finetuning to improve LLMs' instruction compliance ability. The benchmark results indicate that LLMs displayed only moderate proficiency in accuracy-based tasks such as sequential and direct recommendation. However, they demonstrated comparable performance to state-of-the-art methods in explainability-based tasks. We also conduct qualitative evaluations to further evaluate the quality of contents generated by different models, and the results show that LLMs can truly understand the provided information and generate clearer and more reasonable results. We aspire that this benchmark will serve as an inspiration for researchers to delve deeper into the potential of LLMs in enhancing recommendation performance. Our codes, processed data and benchmark results are available at https://github.com/williamliujl/LLMRec.

cs.IR↗

Ontology Interoperability: A Comprehensive Framework for Industrial-Scale Applications

Different ontologies with conflicting and overlapping concepts cause havoc in the design, develop, and deploy of ontology-driven applications. In this work, we propose a comprehensive ontology interoperability framework for industrial-scale ontology-driven applications. The framework employs three state-of-the-art semantic techniques in different phases of the ontology engineering (OE) life cycle: ontology design patterns (ODPs) in the design phase, ontology matching and versioning (OM\&OV) in the develop phase, and ontology validation (OVA) in the deploy phase, to achieve better ontology interoperability.

cs.IR↗

ScholarQuest: A Taxonomy-Guided Benchmark for Agentic Academic Paper Search in Open Literature Environments

Academic paper search is a core step in scientific research, and LLM-based search agents are emerging as a promising paradigm for iterative, intent-driven literature exploration. However, existing benchmarks offer limited coverage of research intents and insufficient support for scalable answer construction and reproducible multi-turn evaluation. We propose \textbf{ScholarQuest}, a taxonomy-guided benchmark constructed from over 1,000 computer science topics and organized around four research intents. To construct answer sets at scale, we combine multi-source retrieval, citation expansion, and multi-stage relevance adjudication. We further build \textit{\textbf{ScholarBase}}, a million-scale literature environment with unified retrieval and citation-expansion interfaces, together with a shared multi-turn search harness. We benchmark complete literature search systems and compare language models within this harness, evaluating retrieval coverage, search efficiency, and robustness across research intents. Results show that agentic methods outperform single-shot retrieval baselines, yet the best-performing search system achieves only 0.312 Recall@100 and 0.352 Recall@All. Comparisons under the shared harness reveal intent-dependent model strengths, with higher Planner token consumption not consistently yielding higher recall. We release the benchmark, retrieval backend, and evaluation harness for reproducible research

cs.IR↗