Truncation Samplers Are Nested: Comparing Decoding Rules Is a Measurement Problem

Rasul Khanbayov; Hasan Kurban

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.15570

Truncation Samplers Are Nested: Comparing Decoding Rules Is a Measurement Problem

Rasul Khanbayov·Hasan Kurban

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Settling one comparison between two truncation samplers has cost six thousand A100-hours, and nothing says in advance how far apart two samplers can be. We observe that almost every deployed truncation rule keeps a prefix of the probability-sorted vocabulary, so any two such rules are nested at every decoding step. Nesting yields a closed-form per-step distance and a coupling under which both samplers emit identical text until they first disagree. Accumulated over a generation, this gives a separation certificate that bounds the difference between two samplers on any bounded outcome, is computable from logs a comparison already produces, and equals their sequence-level total variation distance exactly when neither rule ever overtakes the other. Two consequences follow without measurement: exactness is fragile, and certifying a small difference requires the two retained masses to agree to very high precision at every step. On six open-weight models over four math and science benchmarks, the certificate for every hyperparameter grid we tested is at least 0.998, so a bound alone rarely settles a comparison, although two members of one family can be far closer. What remains useful is the coupling, which gives an unbiased paired estimator that cuts variance $1.2$-$3.8\times$ against prompt-level pairing. Read against benchmark sizes at the default pair's variance and our point estimate of its between-prompt component, resolving a one-point difference needs 8 to 32 samples per prompt on GSM8K, MATH-500 and GPQA-Diamond and about 210 on AIME 2025; at that component's upper confidence bound GPQA-Diamond needs more than 32 and AIME 2025 cannot be resolved at any sample count. Choosing a truncation sampler is a measurement problem at least as much as a design one. The code is available at https://github.com/KurbanIntelligenceLab/truncation-samplers.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Rasul Khanbayov, Hasan Kurban. 2026-10-11. Truncation Samplers Are Nested: Comparing Decoding Rules Is a Measurement Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15570

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Model Predictive Task Sampling for Efficient and Robust Adaptation

Foundation models have revolutionized general-purpose problem-solving, offering rapid task adaptation through pretraining, meta-training, and finetuning. Recent crucial advances in these paradigms reveal the importance of challenging task prioritized sampling to enhance adaptation robustness under distribution shifts. However, ranking task difficulties over iteration as a preliminary step typically requires exhaustive task evaluation, which is practically unaffordable in computation and data-annotation. This study provides a novel perspective to illuminate the possibility of leveraging the dual importance of adaptation robustness and learning efficiency, particularly in scenarios where task evaluation is risky or costly, such as iterative agent-environment interactions for robotic policy evaluation or computationally intensive inference steps for finetuning foundation models. Firstly, we introduce Model Predictive Task Sampling (MPTS), a framework that bridges the task space and adaptation risk distributions, providing a theoretical foundation for robust active task sampling. MPTS employs a generative model to characterize the episodic optimization process and predicts task-specific adaptation risk via posterior inference. The resulting risk predictive model amortizes the costly evaluation of task adaptation performance and provably approximates task difficulty rankings. MPTS seamlessly integrates into zero-shot, few-shot, and supervised finetuning settings. Empirically, we conduct extensive experiments in pattern recognition using foundation models and sequential decision-making. Our results demonstrate that MPTS significantly enhances adaptation robustness for tail risk or out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks and improves learning efficiency compared to state-of-the-art (SoTA) methods. The code is available at the project site https://github.com/thu-rllab/MPTS.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Asynchronous Sharpness-Aware Minimization For Fast and Accurate Deep Learning

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) is an optimization method that improves the generalization performance of machine learning models. Despite its effectiveness, it has not been widely adopted in real-world applications due to its high computational cost. Existing approaches reduce this overhead by approximating or reusing gradients in the perturbation step, but still assume sequential perturbation and update steps. In this study, we introduce AsyncSAM, a variant of SAM that enables concurrent model perturbation and parameter updates across multiple compute resources. By adjusting the perturbation batch size in a system-aware manner, our asynchronous scheme fully overlaps perturbation with updates, eliminating the overhead and allowing even CPUs to perform perturbations without extra time. We also provide theoretical analysis showing that AsyncSAM achieves the same order of convergence as conventional SAM. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AsyncSAM delivers superior generalization performance and the highest training throughput among state-of-the-art SAM variants. For example, in ViT fine-tuning on CIFAR-100, it achieves accuracy comparable to SAM while maintaining training time nearly identical to SGD.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Weisfeiler and Leman Follow the Arrow of Time: Expressive Power of Message Passing in Temporal Event Graphs

An important characteristic of temporal graphs is how the directed arrow of time influences their causal topology, i.e., which nodes can possibly influence each other causally via time-respecting paths. The resulting patterns are often neglected by temporal graph neural networks (TGNNs). To formally analyze the expressive power of TGNNs, we lack a generalization of graph isomorphism to temporal graphs that fully captures their causal topology. Addressing this gap, we introduce the notion of consistent event graph isomorphism, which utilizes a time-unfolded representation of time-respecting paths in temporal graphs. We compare this definition with existing notions of temporal graph isomorphisms. We illustrate and highlight the advantages of our approach and develop a temporal generalization of the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm to heuristically distinguish non-isomorphic temporal graphs. Building on this theoretical foundation, we derive a novel message passing scheme for temporal graph neural networks that operates on the event graph representation of temporal graphs. An experimental evaluation shows that our approach performs well in a temporal graph classification experiment.

cs.LG↗