Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.15834

AI-Guided Assignments in Practice: Students' Experiences in a Large Introductory Statistics Course

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) raise new questions for instructors, among them how to integrate LLMs productively into coursework and what to evaluate in students' work when an LLM can produce much of it directly. LLM-guided homework assignments offer one answer. Instructors configure the LLM to guide students in ways that achieve specific pedagogical goals, such as recalling material, discovering new concepts, or critically evaluating deliberately flawed reasoning, and grade the full student--LLM conversation, and with it the student's reasoning, rather than only the final answer. In this paper, we report on the large-scale deployment of such assignments, implemented through LLteacher, an open-source tool that supports recall, discovery, and critical-thinking assignments, in a large introductory statistics course serving mostly pre-major undergraduates. Results on 134 students show meaningful gains in self-reported confidence, with over 80\% agreeing that the assignments improved their comprehension of course material and their ability to interpret statistical results; gains were largest among students who started with lower confidence, suggesting this approach may help narrow gaps in preparation. Interaction patterns varied widely, from long single messages to rapid iterative exchanges, and hallucinations, when present, were rarely disruptive to learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emanuela Furfaro, Katherine Elizabeth Lovelace, Yuhan Zhang, Simone Mosciatti. 2026-10-11. AI-Guided Assignments in Practice: Students' Experiences in a Large Introductory Statistics Course. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15834

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Examples of statistical practice in elementary particle physics for comparison with Mayo's severity concept

The field of elementary particle physics (also known as high energy physics) has strong traditions in frequentist inference, heavily influenced by Fisher and by Neyman and Pearson. While I am not aware of direct use and citation of Deborah Mayo's severity concept in the field, one might expect that ideas similar to severity were independently developed. Here, I describe typical practice that addresses the same issues that severity was developed to address, with some tentative comparisons with severity. I invite experts on severity to explain how they would apply severity in these cases and to discuss any differences.

stat.OT↗

Generative AI in Publishing: An Editors' Panel on Ethics and Policies

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping scholarly research faster than journals have developed stable norms for its use. This article presents an edited thematic account of a 2026 Joint Statistical Meetings panel that brought together editorial perspectives from mathematical statistics, data science, biomedical statistics, and general statistical scholarship. The discussion examines journal policies, disclosure, authorship and research integrity, peer-review confidentiality, researcher training, editorial workload, access, and possible future models of scholarly publishing. Panelists shared commitments to human accountability, the protection of confidential submissions, and disclosure of consequential assistance, while offering different recommendations on assistance with research ideas and proofs, disclosure requirements, automated review, and policy enforcement. By distinguishing shared principles from unresolved implementation questions, the article clarifies the choices facing statistical publishing and outlines an agenda for evaluating policies and practices as GenAI evolves. The account seeks to foster continued discussion of GenAI in scientific communication and encourage statistical organizations to develop more robust operational standards.

stat.OT↗

Data Quality Assessments: A Theoretically Structured Overview of Approaches and Methods

The quality of data is crucial for both practice and academia, and this holds for descriptive statistics, AI and advanced analytics alike. This study addresses an apparent gap in the literature and as such presents a full and theoretically grounded overview of data quality assessment approaches and methods, as well as their defining characteristics and inter-relationships. For this purpose a broad typology is introduced that employs two theoretical dimensions, namely the evaluation logic (formal versus informal) and the assessment driver (norms versus data). This yields four high-level approaches and 15 methods for assessing data quality. The research results are relevant for academia, as they provide a theory-based overview and definition of the ways that data quality can be evaluated. The study is also relevant for practice because it allows professionals to make informed decisions on using these methods, e.g. as part of an audit or broad data quality assessment strategy.

stat.OT↗