Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.16137

Recall Begets Recall: Recurrent Memory Ranking for Personalized LLMs

Abstract

Memory ranking is the stage in personalized Large Language Models (LLMs) that decides which of the candidate memories returned by a retriever enter the limited context, so that the answer is grounded in the right parts of the user's history. Existing memory rankers operate in a single pass, scoring each candidate once against the raw query and cutting the ranked list at a fixed top-K. The single pass misses memories that the answer needs but that look unrelated to the query on their own, and the fixed cut ignores how many memories the query needs. To address both problems, we propose ReMind, a memory ranker that runs as a recurrent and self-terminating loop, following the cognitive theory of memory search: each recalled item joins the cue for the next recall (compound cueing), and recall stops once enough has been collected for the task (metamemory monitoring). For compound cueing, ReMind adds the top-ranked memory to the query context at each step and reranks the remaining candidates under the expanded cue, so that each recall makes the cue more specific and later steps look for what is still missing rather than for what merely resembles the query. For metamemory monitoring, a sufficiency predictor estimates at each step whether the collected memories are enough to answer the query and stops the loop once they are, so that the number of selected memories adapts to each query. Experiments on public benchmarks show that ReMind achieves the best results compared to state-of-the-art memory rankers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pengyue Jia, Shida Yan, Shunyu Liu, Yingyi Zhang, Leszek Rutkowski, Chenyang Lyu, Dacheng Tao. 2026-10-12. Recall Begets Recall: Recurrent Memory Ranking for Personalized LLMs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16137

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

LLMRec: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Recommendation Task

Recently, the fast development of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT has significantly advanced NLP tasks by enhancing the capabilities of conversational models. However, the application of LLMs in the recommendation domain has not been thoroughly investigated. To bridge this gap, we propose LLMRec, a LLM-based recommender system designed for benchmarking LLMs on various recommendation tasks. Specifically, we benchmark several popular off-the-shelf LLMs, such as ChatGPT, LLaMA, ChatGLM, on five recommendation tasks, including rating prediction, sequential recommendation, direct recommendation, explanation generation, and review summarization. Furthermore, we investigate the effectiveness of supervised finetuning to improve LLMs' instruction compliance ability. The benchmark results indicate that LLMs displayed only moderate proficiency in accuracy-based tasks such as sequential and direct recommendation. However, they demonstrated comparable performance to state-of-the-art methods in explainability-based tasks. We also conduct qualitative evaluations to further evaluate the quality of contents generated by different models, and the results show that LLMs can truly understand the provided information and generate clearer and more reasonable results. We aspire that this benchmark will serve as an inspiration for researchers to delve deeper into the potential of LLMs in enhancing recommendation performance. Our codes, processed data and benchmark results are available at https://github.com/williamliujl/LLMRec.

cs.IR↗

Ontology Interoperability: A Comprehensive Framework for Industrial-Scale Applications

Different ontologies with conflicting and overlapping concepts cause havoc in the design, develop, and deploy of ontology-driven applications. In this work, we propose a comprehensive ontology interoperability framework for industrial-scale ontology-driven applications. The framework employs three state-of-the-art semantic techniques in different phases of the ontology engineering (OE) life cycle: ontology design patterns (ODPs) in the design phase, ontology matching and versioning (OM\&OV) in the develop phase, and ontology validation (OVA) in the deploy phase, to achieve better ontology interoperability.

cs.IR↗

ScholarQuest: A Taxonomy-Guided Benchmark for Agentic Academic Paper Search in Open Literature Environments

Academic paper search is a core step in scientific research, and LLM-based search agents are emerging as a promising paradigm for iterative, intent-driven literature exploration. However, existing benchmarks offer limited coverage of research intents and insufficient support for scalable answer construction and reproducible multi-turn evaluation. We propose \textbf{ScholarQuest}, a taxonomy-guided benchmark constructed from over 1,000 computer science topics and organized around four research intents. To construct answer sets at scale, we combine multi-source retrieval, citation expansion, and multi-stage relevance adjudication. We further build \textit{\textbf{ScholarBase}}, a million-scale literature environment with unified retrieval and citation-expansion interfaces, together with a shared multi-turn search harness. We benchmark complete literature search systems and compare language models within this harness, evaluating retrieval coverage, search efficiency, and robustness across research intents. Results show that agentic methods outperform single-shot retrieval baselines, yet the best-performing search system achieves only 0.312 Recall@100 and 0.352 Recall@All. Comparisons under the shared harness reveal intent-dependent model strengths, with higher Planner token consumption not consistently yielding higher recall. We release the benchmark, retrieval backend, and evaluation harness for reproducible research

cs.IR↗