arXiv · 2610.16417
Not All Challenges Are Equal: Evaluating Interactive Liveness Detection Against Real-Time Face Swaps
Abstract
Remote identity verification assumes that a camera stream shows a live person, yet public real-time face-swap tools can replace that person before the stream reaches the verifier. Passive deepfake detectors generalize poorly to new generators, while interactive challenges are often selected without evidence of which gestures expose current attacks. We evaluate randomized gesture challenges in 108 live sessions with six subjects, 24 impersonated identities, and two face-swap tools, DeepFaceLive and FaceFusion, injected through a virtual camera. The static calibration segment reaches a session-level AUC of 0.878 with a frozen UCF spatial detector, while the mean across the active-gesture windows reaches 0.988. Pose and combined gestures have the highest point estimates, whereas expressions show no clear improvement. Hand occlusion against FaceFusion, configured with an occlusion mask, scores below the static baseline. The end-to-end time required to satisfy the validator also distinguishes attacks from genuine sessions, achieving a session-level AUC of 0.732, although this signal includes synthesis and transport delays. These results show that challenge sets should be tested against current attack configurations and that response time can provide an additional, deployment-specific signal.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Anton Firc, David Drtil, Martin Perešíni, Milan Šalko, Vojtěch Staněk, Kamil Malinka. 2026-10-12. Not All Challenges Are Equal: Evaluating Interactive Liveness Detection Against Real-Time Face Swaps. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16417
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.