arXiv · 2610.16771
Matching Full-Hessian Oracle Complexity for Nonconvex--Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimization
Abstract
We characterize the oracle complexity of finding first-order stationary points in smooth nonconvex--strongly-concave (NC--SC) minimax optimization when each query provides the full Hessian in addition to the function value and gradient. For $Φ(x)=\max_y f(x,y)$, assume that $f$ has an $L$-Lipschitz gradient, a $ρ$-Lipschitz Hessian, and is $μ$-strongly concave in $y$. Let $κ=L/μ$, let $Δ$ denote the initial value gap, and define $r=ρκ^{3/2}\varepsilon/L^2$. We establish matching deterministic upper bounds and randomized lower bounds, up to logarithmic factors and additive initialization costs. When the leading term dominates initialization, the resulting minimax complexity is \[ \widetildeΘ\!\left( \frac{ΔL}{\varepsilon^2}Ψ_κ(r) \right), \qquad Ψ_κ(r)= \begin{cases} r^{1/2}, & 0<r\le 1,\\ r^{2/7}, & 1<r<κ^{7/4},\\ \sqrtκ, & r\geκ^{7/4}. \end{cases} \] Despite the stronger oracle, the optimal complexity exhibits a nontrivial dependence on accuracy, conditioning, and Hessian smoothness. In particular, these regimes exhibit accuracy dependencies $\varepsilon^{-3/2}$, $\varepsilon^{-12/7}$, and $\varepsilon^{-2}$, respectively. The upper bounds combine second-order regularity estimates for a saddle Moreau envelope with certified accelerated reduced-dual solves and amortized warm starts. The lower bounds combine an all-derivative lift with a serial composition of private-handle constructions, using hard instances chosen independently of the algorithm's realized random seed. The resulting characterization quantifies improvements over the classical first-order benchmark under gradient smoothness alone and identifies the regime in which that benchmark is recovered.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Fangqing Zhang, Haihan Zhang, Wendao Wu, Chenheng Zhang, Chunyuan Zheng, Cong Fang, Haoxuan Li, Zhouchen Lin. 2026-10-12. Matching Full-Hessian Oracle Complexity for Nonconvex--Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16771
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.