Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.16919

ML Engineering Agents - A Data Management Perspective

Abstract

Machine learning engineering (MLE) agents are emerging as a new paradigm for automating end-to-end ML pipeline development. Using large language models for code generation and predictive performance as a machine-gradable feedback signal, these agents iteratively synthesize, execute, and refine pipeline code. Yet current systems are largely evaluated on pre-built, single-table benchmarks that abstract away key data management challenges. This tutorial introduces the foundations of MLE agents and highlights research opportunities for the database community. We cover how agents combine program synthesis with iterative and evolutionary optimization, and discuss open challenges in efficient pipeline execution, data discovery and augmentation over heterogeneous sources, reliability and debugging, as well as fairness and compliance. We connect these challenges to existing data management techniques and conclude with a hands-on session using contemporary MLE agents.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arnab Phani, Elias Strauss, Tim Schuster, Sebastian Schelter. 2026-10-12. ML Engineering Agents - A Data Management Perspective. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16919

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Query Repairs

We formalize and study the problem of repairing database queries based on user feedback in the form of a collection of labeled examples. We propose a framework based on the notion of a proximity pre-order, and we investigate and compare query repairs for conjunctive queries (CQs) using different such pre-orders. The proximity pre-orders we consider are based on query containment and on distance metrics for CQs.

cs.DB↗

Towards a B+-tree with Fluctuation-Free Performance

Performance predictability is critical for modern DBMSs. Index maintenance can trigger rare but severe I/O spikes. In a B/B+-tree of Height H, due to node split propagation, the cost of a single insert can vary from (H + 1) I/Os when node split does not happen to (3H + 1) I/Os when split propagation reaches the root, nearly a 3 times degradation. We formalize performance fluctuation as the gap between the best- and worst-case insert behaviors. We show examples of why performance fluctuation is worth investigating. To mitigate the B/B+-tree split propagation, we introduce the FFBtree, a B+-tree with a novel insert and delete algorithms with bounded-fluctuation performance. We prove that the insert operation is guaranteed to encounter at most one node that needs to be split, and hence ensuring that no split propagation can take place. The new insert and delete algorithms guarantee bounded-fluctuation performance for the FFBtree. Experiments with simulated indexes show that the FFBtree caps I/O fluctuation compared to baseline indexes under various workloads.

cs.DB↗

Are Diffusion Language Models Good Database Analysts?

Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) enable iterative global refinement, but their effectiveness in Natural Language to SQL (NL2SQL) remains unclear because heterogeneous architectures and evaluation setups hinder fair comparison with autoregressive (AR) models. Their iterative denoising process permits sequence-wide revision, offering a different way to handle the long-range structural dependencies in SQL. We present a systematic study of DLM-based NL2SQL under a unified framework that standardizes generation and execution across DLM architectures. We further introduce SQL-D1, an agentic inference framework combining database-aware retrieval, multi-trajectory denoising, execution-guided verification, and selection based on execution denotations. Across diverse benchmark settings, strong DLMs are competitive with some open-source AR models and offer flexible trade-offs between efficiency and accuracy, although they still trail the strongest AR systems on difficult queries. Test-time scaling yields substantial gains, whereas standard supervised fine-tuning yields unstable outcomes across the evaluated DLMs. Stronger model variants exhibit fewer schema-grounding errors, but failures involving complex clauses and query nesting persist. These results clarify the capabilities and limitations of DLMs for database analysis and provide a standardized foundation for future work. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SQL-D1-82DF.

cs.DB↗