Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.16926

Graph Distortion Distances, Gromov-Hausdorff and the Hardness of Gromov-Wasserstein

Abstract

We study the computational complexity of graph distortion distances, a family of graph metrics measuring how vertex distances differ between two graphs. Formally, these distances are defined in terms of standard matrix norms on the difference of distance matrices under an optimal vertex alignment. The resulting metrics have natural interpretations, corresponding to three ways of measuring the distortion of shortest-path distances: the maximum distortion among all vertex pairs (entrywise maximum norm), global aggregation (entrywise $p$-norms), and local aggregation (operator $p$-norms) of distortions. For maximum distortion, we show that approximation below a factor of two is NP-hard even for highly restricted trees. Due to the close connection to the Gromov-Hausdorff distance, we obtain a similar hardness result for the latter. In both cases, we show essentially optimal additive inapproximability. On the algorithmic side, we give a subcubic-time algorithm for optimal embeddings of connected graphs into paths, based on a structural decomposition along a diametral path. Additionally, we give a simple approximation algorithm when one input graph has a "relatively path-like" metric structure, i.e. has bounded pathlength. For local and global distortion, we derive various hardness results even for restricted inputs. Making use of a close connection between the global distortion distances and Gromov-Wasserstein distances, we give the first formal proof of NP-hardness of the latter, which has been claimed in the literature many times but has, to the best of our knowledge, never been correctly proven.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jens Breitung, Timo Gervens, Julius Pörzgen. 2026-10-12. Graph Distortion Distances, Gromov-Hausdorff and the Hardness of Gromov-Wasserstein. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16926

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Primal-Dual Approach to Randomized Online Bidding with Tail Constraints

Controlling tail risk in randomized algorithms has received increasing attention. Randomized online algorithms can achieve a lower expected competitive ratio than the competitive ratio of the best deterministic online algorithm. However, individual executions may still incur poor outcomes. Tail constraints address this risk by limiting the probability that the incurred ratio exceeds a prescribed threshold. We investigate how such constraints affect the structure and performance of randomized online bidding algorithms. By revisiting the classical primal-dual lower-bound framework for online bidding, we find that restricting the growth between consecutive bids can yield a stronger lower bound on the expected competitive ratio. We then show that tail constraints with zero exceedance probability impose an asymptotic upper bound on the ratios between consecutive bids. Incorporating this structural property into the primal-dual framework allows us to derive a stronger lower bound. Moreover, the dual analysis suggests a randomized geometric bidding algorithm whose performance matches this bound. The insight from our primal-dual analysis also guides the design of algorithms for general tail constraints allowing positive exceedance probabilities. Motivated by the geometric growth suggested by the dual solution, we study randomized periodic bidding algorithms. We show that, for any fixed geometric base, the uniform offset distribution is optimal in terms of both the expected competitive ratio and tail-constraint feasibility. We then characterize the exceedance probability of these algorithms and use this characterization to choose a geometric growth factor that satisfies the prescribed tail constraints, establishing parameter-dependent upper bounds on the optimal expected competitive ratio.

cs.DM↗

On Collusion-Free Teaching in Planar Graphs

Non-clashing teaching minimizes teaching complexity among models satisfying the Goldman--Mathias collusion-avoidance criterion. While the Vapnik--Chervonenkis dimension (VCdim) measures the complexity of learning from samples, non-clashing teaching dimension (NCTD) measures the number of examples required when a teacher can select them. Whether NCTD is always bounded above by VCdim remains a fundamental open question in learning theory. In this paper, we investigate this question for the concept classes of closed neighborhoods in planar graphs. We prove a tight upper bound of two on their NCTD, thereby establishing the conjectured inequality for this family. For the positive variant NCTD+, in which teaching sets contain only positive examples, we obtain a tight upper bound of four. Finally, we show that deciding whether either NCTD+ or NCTD is at most one is NP-complete, even for concept classes of closed neighborhoods in planar graphs. In particular, despite the upper bound of two on NCTD for such classes, distinguishing between NCTD values of one and two remains NP-hard.

cs.DM↗

Period Piece: NEXPTIME-complete problems on digraphs via Boolean network dynamics

The central object in this work is the Boolean network, a function $f:\{0,1\}^V \to \{0,1\}^V$. Often identified with $f$ is its dynamics $D_f$, the digraph with exactly $\{x \to y : f(x)=y\}$ as its arcs. The interaction graph of $f$ is the digraph $G$ on $V$ which can be thought of as representing the dependencies of the components of $f$ on one another. On the other hand, model-checking is a major field of study in graph algorithms and complexity. We consider problems at the intersection of these paradigms: for a given property $ϕ$, we say that a digraph $G$ is $ϕ$-dynamic if $G$ is the interaction graph of some Boolean network $f$ such that $D_f \models ϕ$. The corresponding decision problem $ϕ$-DYNAMIC asks whether $G$ is $ϕ$-dynamic. Problems of this form are well-studied in the Boolean networks community. For example, it is a well-known result that, letting $ϕ$ be 'No fixed points' (i.e. $\nexists x:x\to x$), $ϕ$-DYNAMIC is equivalent to the structural digraph problem NON-ACYCLIC, which is solvable in linear time. We establish, for the first time, properties $ϕ$ for which $ϕ$-DYNAMIC is computationally hard. These include the 'Unique fixed point' property $\exists!x:x\to x$, and a range of properties concerning the periodic points of $f$ (i.e. vertices of $D_f$ which lie on a cycle). More widely, we exhibit an infinite family of natural properties $ϕ$ such that $ϕ$-DYNAMIC is $\mathrm{NEXPTIME}$-complete, which we call PERIOD PIECE. As a special case, these include all properties of the form 'Unique cycle of length $k$' and 'Exactly $k$ fixed points' for any $k \ge 1$. On the other hand, we show that if the input digraph has bounded in-degree, then for those same problems $ϕ$-DYNAMIC collapses down to $\mathrm{NP}^{\mathrm{NP}}$, the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, though it remains $\mathrm{NP}^{\mathrm{NP}}$-complete.

cs.DM↗