arXiv · 2610.17018
LLM Evaluation is a Forecasting Problem
Abstract
Standard procedure in machine learning is to randomly split train and test data, emulating IID draws from one underlying data distribution. In practice, models are trained on past data and deployed in the future, which may come from distinct distributions. In this paper, we find that web text is indeed highly non-stationary, as text distributions shift over time. We further observe that model performance changes continuously over time across diverse benchmarks. Consequently, future model performance is better predicted by measurements made on recent evaluation data, and is best predicted by time series forecasters applied to historic performance rather than by historic performance itself. Choosing which model to deploy based on forecasted accuracy enables more reliable selection of performant models, thus improving downstream accuracy in the regime practitioners care about: deployment. Taken together, our experiments suggest that time should be treated as a fundamental variable in LLM evaluation. We release our code and data.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Rahul Thomas, Adam Block, Micah Goldblum. 2026-10-12. LLM Evaluation is a Forecasting Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17018
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.