arXiv · 2610.17658
Worth Their Weights? Evaluating Generative Models for Discourse Parsing
Abstract
Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) parsing has historically been dominated by discriminative models based on pretrained encoder-only language models. The recent availability of high-quality generative language models has made it unclear whether RST parsing is better approached as a generative task. In this work, we investigate whether generative language models are better at parsing RST than traditional discriminative ones. We find that at matched parameter counts, discriminative parsers perform much better than generative ones, though much larger generative models sometimes outperform them. Generative models hold a particular advantage in elementary discourse unit (EDU) segmentation, and we report new state-of-the-art results on the RST-DT benchmark in end-to-end parsing as well as segmentation.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Luke Gessler, Amir Zeldes. 2026-10-13. Worth Their Weights? Evaluating Generative Models for Discourse Parsing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17658
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.