More Reader Data or a Better Teacher? Updating a Model of Crowd Highlights in Late 2026

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A model trained on readers' highlights can show a newcomer where earlier readers converged on a page, even on pages with few readers. A year of stronger language models suggests two upgrades: use them directly, or use them as teachers. We compare both with a third, more reader data, on one social highlighting platform, with the comparisons, the selection rules and a sealed set of fresh pages fixed in advance. On 215 development pages, seven language models released by October 2026 rank sentences zero-shot at an average precision of at most 0.3744 against the sentences half the readers marked most, and 0.3931 when fused with reading position, while a 3-billion-parameter model trained on reader highlights alone reaches 0.4346. Used as the teacher that breaks ties among readers' counts, the stronger fusion changes a trained model by +0.0013 [-0.0012, +0.0040], whereas going from half to all of its training pages adds +0.0242 [+0.0179, +0.0301]. A 27-billion-parameter backbone on the reader-only recipe adds +0.0225 on the development pages; on 131 fresh pages, read once and too few for a confirmatory comparison, its difference from the 3-billion model is unresolved, both score above the fusion, and in an exploratory split their lead over the previous model sits on pages from domains that their fresh training pages also cover. In this recipe, more reader data improves a trained model where a stronger tie-breaking teacher yields no material gain, and frontier models used as rankers still trail a small model trained on readers.

Explore related subjects

cs.IR cs.CL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kazuki Nakayashiki, Keisuke Watanabe. 2026-10-13. More Reader Data or a Better Teacher? Updating a Model of Crowd Highlights in Late 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17768

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

EviRerank: Adaptive Evidence Construction for Long-Document LLM Reranking

Decoder-only LLM rerankers struggle with long documents: inference is costly and relevance signals can be diluted by irrelevant context. Motivated by an attention analysis indicating a consistent degradation trend when non-relevant text is appended, we propose EviRerank, an evidence-based long-document reranking framework for decoder-only LLMs. EviRerank (i) scores document blocks with a lightweight selector (BM25, bi-encoder, or cross-encoder), (ii) constructs a compact reranking context under a hard token cap by dynamically budgeting evidence blocks with Adaptive Evidence Budgeting (AEB) and adding a global summary cue via Summary Augmentation (SA), and (iii) reranks with a decoder-only LLM. Across TREC DL'19, DL'22, DL'23, and MLDR-zh, EviRerank consistently outperforms full-document LLM reranking and strong block-selection baselines while substantially reducing the required input length. On TREC DL'19, EviRerank reaches up to 0.744 nDCG@10 while substantially reducing reranking latency. Additional RankZephyr-7B experiments confirm transfer to listwise reranking under matched context budgets.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

On the Impact of Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Topological Perspective

In recommender systems, user-item interactions can be modeled as a bipartite graph, where user and item nodes are connected by undirected edges. This graph-based view has motivated the rapid adoption of graph neural networks (GNNs), which often outperform collaborative filtering (CF) methods such as latent factor models, deep neural networks, and generative strategies. Yet, despite their empirical success, the reasons why GNNs offer systematic advantages over other CF approaches remain only partially understood. This monograph advances a topology-centered perspective on GNN-based recommendation. We argue that a comprehensive understanding of these models' performance should consider the structural properties of user-item graphs and their interaction with GNN architectural design. To support this view, we introduce a formal taxonomy that distills common modeling patterns across eleven representative GNN-based recommendation approaches and consolidates them into a unified conceptual pipeline. We further formalize thirteen classical and topological characteristics of recommendation datasets and reinterpret them through the lens of graph machine learning. Using these definitions, we analyze the considered GNN-based recommender architectures to assess how and to what extent they encode such properties. Building on this analysis, we derive an explanatory framework that links measurable dataset characteristics to model behavior and performance. Taken together, this monograph re-frames GNN-based recommendation through its topological underpinnings and outlines open theoretical, data-centric, and evaluation challenges for the next generation of topology-aware recommender systems.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Relevance Supervision Can Teach Neural Retrievers to Prefer LLM-Generated Text

Recent studies show that neural retrievers often exhibit source bias, ranking LLM-generated passages above semantically similar human-written ones, which threatens the reliability of modern information access systems. While this bias is often viewed as a model-level property, we show that relevance supervision itself can induce it. Empirically, source bias is clearest in relevance-supervised retrievers, and the same encoders become more LLM-preferring after relevance fine-tuning. We trace this effect to surface-level artifacts in supervised retrieval data: annotated positives and negatives differ systematically in properties such as fluency and lexical specificity, and these differences parallel those between LLM-generated and human-written passages. As a result, retrievers can learn artifact-based shortcuts for relevance. We further show theoretically that, under contrastive learning, artifacts that reliably separate positives from negatives can be encoded into learned relevance scores. Motivated by this mechanism, we propose complementary strategies that reduce source bias during training and at inference: balancing artifact distributions in negative sampling and removing the artifact-aligned embedding component, respectively. Overall, our findings support a data-centric view of source bias: retrievers may prefer LLM-generated text not merely because of inherent model properties, but because relevance supervision teaches them to rely on surface-level artifacts.

cs.IR↗