Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.17924

Free-support Wasserstein Resampling in Sequential Monte Carlo

Abstract

In modern sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) applications, such as diffusion model samplers, propagating a particle is expensive, so only a few particles can be afforded. In this regime, each resampling step decides which regions of the state space survive, so a better resampling scheme is worth extra computation. However, classical resampling methods only replicate existing particles and suffer from sample impoverishment, especially when the particle size is small relative to the dimension. To create new particles, we relax the unbiasedness of resampling and control the mean squared error via a Wasserstein criterion. Specifically, we propose Wasserstein-Dirichlet resampling (WDR), which constructs an equal-weight measure that optimally approximates the weighted particle distribution by solving a free-support Wasserstein barycenter problem. We then randomize the resulting optimal coupling by Dirichlet mixing. Theoretically, we provide non-asymptotic mean squared error bounds that quantify the bias-variance trade-off and show that the rate depends on the intrinsic dimension. A truncated variant preserves high-weight particles while applying WDR to the remaining mass, targeting mild weight degeneracy. Experiments on state-space models and conditional image generation demonstrate that WDR consistently improves estimation accuracy, stability, and sample diversity. The improvements persist at matched wall-clock cost when the propagation cost dominates.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mengyu Li, Cheng Meng, Jun S. Liu. 2026-10-13. Free-support Wasserstein Resampling in Sequential Monte Carlo. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17924

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Assumption-Lean Differential Variance Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Detection

The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is frequently estimated in clinical studies to refute a homogeneous treatment effect hypothesis. Under this regime, all patients making up the population experience identical benefit from a given treatment relative to a comparator. Uncovering heterogeneous treatment effects through inference about the CATE, however, requires that covariates truly modifying the treatment effect be reliably collected at baseline. CATE-based techniques will necessarily fail to detect violations when effect modifiers are omitted from the data due to, for example, resource constraints. Severe measurement error has a similar impact. Clinical decision makers can be misled as a result. To address these limitations, we prove that a practical homogeneous treatment effect hypothesis can be gauged through inference about contrasts of the potential outcomes' variances even when effect modifiers are missing from the data. We derive causal machine learning estimators of these contrasts and study their asymptotic properties. We establish that these estimators are doubly robust and asymptotically linear under mild conditions, permitting formal hypothesis testing about treatment effect heterogeneity. Numerical experiments demonstrate that these estimators' asymptotic guarantees are approximately achieved in finite-sample randomized and observational study data alike. These inference procedures are then used to detect heterogeneous treatment effects in the re-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating targeted temperature management in cardiac arrest patients.

stat.ME↗

Estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in clustered data with an application to analyzing caries and periodontal disease data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

The within-cluster subgroup composition of units can inform on the marginal distribution of those units outcomes, denoted informative subgroup size (ISS). Moreover, within-cluster subgroup composition of paired outcomes can allow one outcome to inform upon the marginal distribution of the other. If this type of ISS ignored, it can bias marginal association estimates by allowing subgroup composition to influence how clusters contribute to the analysis. We develop two weighting approaches for estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in this setting. The weights are derived using within-cluster resampling arguments and extend conventional cluster weighting to paired response subgroups. We adapt an existing test of marginal dependence to assess ISS by examining this subgroup structure in both directions. In simulated data exhibiting this bidirectional ISS, pair-based weighting reduced bias when association was primarily carried through the paired observations. These weights also allow scientifically or clinically meaningful dichotomizations to enter directly into the weighting scheme, with the choice of subgroup definition further improving estimation in several simulated settings. Application to NHANES oral-health data showed strong evidence of ISS for filled-surface outcomes across subgroups defined by clinical attachment loss and pocket depth, with the corresponding periodontal--caries associations generally small and positive. These methods provide a practical approach for estimating marginal association when paired subgroup composition is informative.

stat.ME↗

Functional Principal Component Analysis for Manifold-Indexed Data

Functional principal component analysis has traditionally focused on processes indexed by Euclidean domains, although functional observations increasingly arise on curved domains. We develop FPCA for real-valued processes observed with noise at discrete locations on a general Riemannian manifold. We estimate the mean and covariance functions using intrinsic kernel smoothing based on geodesic distance and a normal-coordinate volume correction, with a general weighting scheme accommodating unequal numbers of observations across subjects. We establish $L^2$ and uniform convergence rates for these estimators and derive corresponding error bounds for the estimated eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. These results quantify how manifold dimension, sampling frequency and weighting affect estimation accuracy and characterize the phase transition between sparse and dense sampling regimes. Simulation studies on the circle and sphere, together with real-data applications, illustrate the finite-sample performance of the proposed methodology.

stat.ME↗