Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.18682

Physics-Informed Deep Learning in Oncology

Abstract

Deep learning has enabled substantial advances in oncology, including cancer detection and diagnosis, medical image analysis, tumor characterization, treatment planning, response assessment, and outcome prediction. However, conventional data-driven models often require large annotated datasets, exhibit limited generalization across heterogeneous clinical settings, and lack explicit mechanisms for incorporating the physical, physiological, and biological principles underlying cancer development and treatment. Physics-informed deep learning (PIDL) integrates governing physical laws, mechanistic models, physiological constraints, and domain knowledge into deep learning frameworks, providing a principled approach for learning from sparse, noisy, and heterogeneous oncological data. This review presents a task-oriented synthesis of PIDL methods across oncology, encompassing neural networks, Kolmogorov-Arnold networks, convolutional and vision architectures, neural operators, generative models, and hybrid physics-data-driven frameworks. Their applications are examined across cancer detection and diagnosis, image reconstruction and analysis, tumor characterization, quantitative imaging, tumor progression, treatment response, radiation therapy, treatment planning, and multimodal clinical modeling. Based on the synthesized methodological and application-level evidence, we develop task-optimized PIDL workflows that align the clinical task with appropriate data representations, physical constraints, model architectures, and validation strategies. We further analyze key challenges, including physical-model fidelity, computational scalability, uncertainty quantification, domain generalization, standardized benchmarking, and clinical validation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Scindhiya Laxmi, Vivek S. Yadav, Ameya D. Jagtap. 2026-10-13. Physics-Informed Deep Learning in Oncology. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18682

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A bifidelity sparse-grid surrogate model driven by a discrepancy indicator

Sparse-grid approximations based on Lagrange polynomials are one of the staple methods for approximating functions that are high-dimensional and expensive to evaluate, e.g. in the context of PDE-based parametric design exploration. They are, however, known to have limited granularity: refining these sparse-grid approximations may require multiple additional function evaluations, potentially leading to computational inefficiency. To address this issue, we propose a selection criterion for the candidate collocation points introduced by the refinement procedure: the function is evaluated only at those points for which a suitable (and crucially zero-cost) discrepancy indicator suggests that the additional evaluation would significantly change the resulting approximation. The remaining collocation points are instead assigned values predicted by the already available sparse-grid approximation, i.e., following a bifidelity approach that reduces costs while preserving accuracy. The effectiveness of this methodology is demonstrated on several benchmark functions and on an engineering application concerning flashback phenomena in hydrogen-fueled perforated burners.

cs.CE↗

FinTradeBench: A Financial Reasoning Benchmark for LLMs

Financial analysis requires reasoning over heterogeneous signals, including company fundamentals from regulatory filings and trading signals derived from market prices. However, existing financial benchmarks focus almost exclusively on regulatory filings, neglecting market dynamics and cross-signal interactions. We introduce FinTradeBench, a benchmark of 1,400 questions covering NASDAQ-100 stocks over a ten-year window. To holistically evaluate financial reasoning, FinTradeBench includes questions in three reasoning categories: fundamentals-focused, trading-signal-focused, and hybrid questions that require cross-signal reasoning. Our benchmark starts with 150 expert-authored seed questions, which are then scaled to 1400. To ensure reliable evaluation, we create a Core400 subset in which every item is expert-reviewed. In zero-shot (No-RAG) response generation, we observe that all models perform substantially worse on trading-focused questions compared to fundamental-focused questions. To identify failure causes, we evaluate LLMs under controlled settings including retrieval-based baselines, tool-assisted computation, oracle conditions, and time-series-specialized pipelines. LLMs' capabilities to do computation and evidence selection contribute most to reasoning failures. Additionally, retrieval significantly improves trading-signal reasoning but does not improve fundamental reasoning, where identifying relevant signals remains the dominant failure mode. Finally, rather than relying on a small, fine-tuned model for time-series reasoning, it is better to summarize the time-series data and leverage LLMs' reasoning capabilities.

cs.CE↗

Non-linear mechanical field reconstruction coupling recurrent neural networks with physics-informed graph neural networks

Reconstructing local stress fields in heterogeneous microstructures under non-linear, history-dependent loading remains a major computational bottleneck in multi-scale simulations. We propose a coupled LSTM-GNN framework that links the temporal and spatial aspects of local stress field reconstruction. A Long Short-Term Memory network encodes macroscopic stress-strain sequences into a compact hidden state that captures the path-dependent constitutive response, while a physics-informed Graph Neural Network reconstructs the spatially-resolved stress field at each time step. We introduce a relative weighting strategy with linear warm-up to balance the data-driven reconstruction loss and a discrete divergence-based equilibrium penalty. This resolves the scale mismatch that prevents fixed-weight formulations from converging in the elasto-plastic regime. The model is trained on 10,000 non-proportional loading paths applied to a periodic plate-with-a-hole microstructure and von Mises elasto-plasticity. The model achieves three orders of magnitude speedup over finite element simulations and generalizes to loading sequences twice the training length, with 1.9% cumulative error. Because the graph relies on mesh connectivity instead of the specific element type, one trained surrogate can be applied directly without retraining to meshes with different element types and to both coarser and finer resolutions, while in all cases reproducing the high-fidelity quad-element FE field used during training. Indeed, the message passing characteristics inherent to GNN and MeshGraphNet architecture render the model mesh-agnostic. Analysis of the LSTM hidden states suggests a low-dimensional structure related to the internal state variables of the constitutive model.

cs.CE↗