Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.19630

Risk-Controlled DFT Selection for Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials

Kun Ryu·Yeo Jin Jung·Shyue Ping Ong·Claire Donnat·Ying Shirley Meng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Automated materials discovery requires evaluating large pools of candidate configurations, with density functional theory (DFT) as a major throughput bottleneck. Pretrained machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) approximate DFT cheaply, but their errors vary by orders of magnitude across configurations, making it difficult to decide when to trust the MLIP predictions and when to fall back to DFT. We frame this decision as a risk-controlled selection problem and solve it within a conformal risk control (CRC) framework. Each configuration is mapped from atomic numbers and Cartesian coordinates to a fixed geometric descriptor, which a lightweight predictor uses to estimate an MLIP-DFT disagreement score in energy, average force, and maximum force. CRC then calibrates this score into a selection threshold for DFT labeling such that the MLIP error on the unselected configurations, which keep their MLIP labels, stays below a user-chosen fraction $α$ of the expected error. Under an identical guarantee across eight dataset-MLIP pairs, our predictor routes 7% and 14% fewer configurations to DFT at $α=0.3$ than committee baselines. Because committee disagreement overlooks errors the MLIPs share, our gains are largest when the DFT labels and MLIP training data differ in DFT functional and basis set, and narrow when the two agree. Without model access, the structure-only predictor also ranks errors as well as the target MLIP's latent representation and outperforms widely used descriptors such as Smooth Overlap of Atomic Positions (SOAP) and Atom-Centered Symmetry Functions (ACSF).

Explore related subjects

stat.MLcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kun Ryu, Yeo Jin Jung, Shyue Ping Ong, Claire Donnat, Ying Shirley Meng. 2026-10-14. Risk-Controlled DFT Selection for Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19630

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Efficient Agnostic Learning of Univariate Densities Under Local Differential Privacy

We propose a general framework for non-interactive locally differentially private (LDP) learning of structured univariate distributions that can be approximated by piece-wise polynomials. This gives the first sample-efficient LDP learners for several distribution classes, including mixtures of log-concave distributions, such as Gaussian mixture models (GMMs). These learners also provide agnostic guarantees and are computationally efficient. We also prove a lower bound for learning GMMs under LDP, improving on the standard pure-DP packing lower bounds of Bun et al. [BKSW19]. To obtain our general learning framework, we develop an efficient non-interactive LDP algorithm for synthetic data generation over large domains, which may be of independent interest. We then use it together with a deterministic adaptation of the non-private piecewise polynomial learner of Acharya et al. [ADLS17].

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Score Mismatch and Set-Constrained Sampling in Zero-Shot Conditional Discrete Diffusion

Discrete diffusion models have become a powerful framework for modeling complex discrete distributions across a range of applications. While theoretical convergence guarantees depend on consistency between the target and training distributions, such a case rarely holds in practice, making score mismatch a central challenge in discrete diffusion sampling. This is particularly relevant to zero-shot conditional generation, where a model trained on the unconditional distribution is directly reused at inference time to sample from a conditional target distribution. In this paper, we provide the first theoretical analysis for score-mismatched discrete diffusion models and derive a general KL divergence upper bound that clearly identifies the additional bias caused by such a mismatch. Our analysis covers partial-observation constraints, including text infilling, sentence completion, and more general coordinatewise set constraints. Specifically, we analyze the classical Conditional SEDD sampler and show that it can incur a bias term that scales with the dimension, vocabulary size, and compatibility. Based on this analysis, we propose a Randomized Hard Clamping (RHC) sampler for coordinatewise set constraints. We show that the assignment probabilities can be expressed exactly by the unconditional scores with absorbing rate. Finally, numerical and real-data experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed RHC sampler.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Dimension-Free PAC-Bayes Generalization for Deep Neural Networks via Dirichlet Processes

Classical PAC-Bayesian generalization theory places prior distributions over Euclidean parameter space $Θ\subseteq \mathbb{R}^D$, causing relative entropy to scale with network dimension $D$. For modern overparameterized neural networks where $D \gg n$, this parameter-counting dependency yields vacuous generalization bounds ($> 1{,}000\%$). In this work, we resolve this barrier by shifting prior specification from internal parameters to the non-parametric space of data distributions $\mathcal{M}_1(\mathcal{Z})$ via a \textbf{Dirichlet Process (DP)}, $\mathcal{DP}(α, F_0)$, inducing parameter distributions through push-forward measures under the learning algorithm. By the Data Processing Inequality, parameter-space relative entropy is strictly bounded by the data-space DP divergence, which we evaluate in exact closed form using Digamma functions. The resulting PAC-Bayesian certificate is strictly invariant to network parameter count $D$, width, and depth. On intrinsic $d^*$-dimensional submanifolds, optimal partition scaling achieves the minimax non-parametric rate $\mathcal{O}(n^{-1/(d^*+2)} \sqrt{\ln n})$. Across vision architectures scaling up to 4.2 million parameters ($D = 7{,}850$ to $D = 4{,}203{,}522$) on the full MNIST benchmark, while classical weight-space bounds scale past $940\%$ (becoming vacuous), our data-space DP-PAC-Bayes certificate remains stable, non-vacuous, and certified at \textbf{$8.8\%$--$9.4\%$}.

stat.ML↗