Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.20271

Memory-resolved prediction of ligand residence times on the minutes timescale

Hossein Batebi·Lucas Tepper·Roland R. Netz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AI-enabled computational drug discovery is advancing rapidly in predicting molecular structures, binding poses and affinities, but ligand dissociation kinetics remain harder to access. Bound-state residence time, important for biological response and kinetic selectivity, is not fixed by equilibrium affinity but depends on the dissociation free-energy landscape and dissipative friction effects. Here, we show that restrained umbrella-sampling trajectories can be used to calculate residence times on the minutes timescale. Time-resolved coordinate fluctuations yield friction profiles that incorporate non-Markovian effects on dissociation kinetics. Combining them with the free-energy profile, we predict a residence time of $τ_{\rm res}$ = 275 s for the adenosine A$_{2A}$ receptor with ZM241385 (comparable to the experimental value of 125 s) and reproduce the experimental ranking of wild type and two receptor mutants. For HSP90 with compound 18 and RNase S with the S15 peptide, we predict $τ_{\rm res}$ = 2,169 s and 2,259 s (experimental values are 833 s and 2,439 s). Neglecting memory effects on residence kinetics overestimates $τ_{\rm res}$ by factors of 2.6 to 29.

Explore related subjects

physics.bio-phcond-mat.stat-mech

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hossein Batebi, Lucas Tepper, Roland R. Netz. 2026-10-14. Memory-resolved prediction of ligand residence times on the minutes timescale. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20271

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

When is vaccine prioritization worth optimizing?

Optimizing vaccine prioritization is often treated as the default policy response when vaccine supply is limited. Yet optimized prioritization carries administrative, ethical and communication costs, motivating an upstream question: whether differences among vaccine allocations can alter epidemic outcomes enough to make optimization epidemiologically necessary. We show that optimization is not always worth pursuing: in some regimes, vaccination markedly reduces epidemic burden, but many feasible allocation rules perform almost equally well, making the necessity of optimization low. We quantify this necessity as the range of epidemic outcomes generated by different allocations under fixed supply and show that it is governed by competition between vaccinating high-contact groups to slow transmission and vaccinating groups that benefit most directly: necessity is low when these protection routes are balanced and high when one dominates. Increasing transmission intensity changes this balance and drives a transition in the optimal allocation from transmission-focused prioritization toward direct protection. Different prevention objectives exhibit distinct transition thresholds, creating regimes in which optimizing one objective substantially compromises another, thereby revealing when the choice of prevention target matters most. This framework reframes vaccine prioritization as a prior decision problem, identifying when optimization is warranted, when simpler rules suffice, and when prevention goals conflict.

physics.bio-ph↗
arXiv2026

Mutual Information in High-Dimensional Neural Coding

Estimating mutual information in large neural populations is limited by the exponential growth of possible neural response patterns. Here we apply a Monte Carlo framework to make this problem tractable by sampling from a conditionally independent population model fit from single-neuron responses. The estimator accurately recovers analytical ground truth, corrects finite-data bias, and scales to empirical recordings containing 100 to 10,000 neurons from visual cortex, hippocampus, and retina. Across systems, stimulus uncertainty decays exponentially with population size, revealing a simple scaling law for high-dimensional neural codes.

physics.bio-ph↗
arXiv2026

A dynamic mathematical model for sub-lethal damage recovery: Integrating recovery processes into multi-target theory to visualize damage states

Quantifying the biological effects of radiation is essential for radiotherapy and radiation protection. While research has centered on statistical analyses of experimental data, this approach often fails to elucidate underlying mechanisms, limiting the development of generalizable models. Describing time dependent phenomena, such as sub-lethal damage (SLD) recovery during fractionated irradiation, presents a particularly significant challenge for existing static models. To address this, we developed a mechanistic mathematical model that extends the classical multi-target, single-hit model by introducing explicit recovery transitions among damage states, allowing the simultaneous description of radiation-induced damage accumulation and biological recovery. We applied this model to Elkind and Sutton's classical split-dose experimental data to determine its parameters. The model reproduced the major features of split-dose survival curves for treatments with 0-, 2.5-, and 23-hour recovery intervals. We visualized the temporal changes in damage state distributions within the cell populations. These simulations provided a process-level interpretation of the characteristic shoulder-like response appearing after an inter-fraction recovery interval. Furthermore, the estimated recovery half-life was about 120 minutes, which is broadly consistent with reported timescales of DNA double-strand break repair in mammalian cells, supporting the biological interpretability of the model parameters. The proposed framework provides a simple, interpretable description of radiation-induced cell death dynamics, including SLD recovery, and may serve as a basis for the improved mechanistic modeling of radiobiological effects under different irradiation protocols.

physics.bio-ph↗