Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.20296

Opportunities for Direct-to-Cell Polarization MIMO in the S-band Downlink of a LEO Satellite Footprint

Rainer Bachl·Matteo Ferro·Bingguang Peng·Muhammad Nabeel
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A single low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite offers almost no spatial degrees of freedom. Its two polarizations, however, can be exploited to carry a second layer to a handset, which 5G New Radio (NR) non-terrestrial networks do not use yet. The gain of this layer in downlink spectral efficiency (SE) is mapped over the footprint of a satellite at 330 km altitude above Munich transmitting at 2 GHz. The channel is modeled as a cascade of Jones factors for the phased-array payload, Faraday rotation, a dual-polarized land mobile satellite (LMS) channel with a line of sight, and a standardized handset antenna element at three attitudes. For a handset with boresight pointing to zenith, ideal precoding selects rank 2 with a probability of at least 0.95 within about 340 km of the nadir point at a reference signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 6 dB. With closed-loop precoding, such a handset on the nadir track is in rank 2 during 99% of a pass. At 13 dB, rank selection with closed-loop precoding raises the mean SE over the footprint by 49%, and upright handsets gain about 31%. Their gain is limited to the positions where they face the satellite, since the element gain is low behind the handset. At 3 dB, these gains fall to 15% and 7%.

Explore related subjects

eess.SP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rainer Bachl, Matteo Ferro, Bingguang Peng, Muhammad Nabeel. 2026-10-14. Opportunities for Direct-to-Cell Polarization MIMO in the S-band Downlink of a LEO Satellite Footprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20296

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Denoising Rather Than Gap Filling: Missing-Data Handling in Sparse Outdoor BLE Positioning

Received signal strength indicator (RSSI) positioning outdoors has one to two orders of magnitude fewer anchors than the indoor systems its methods come from. In the ten-day cattle-tracking deployment reported here, four gateways cover $4{,}302\,\mathrm{m}^2$, or $0.93$ anchors per $1000\,\mathrm{m}^2$. An animal is heard by $0.99$ gateways per second on average, so the observation vector for a given second is almost never complete. How the gaps are filled is therefore a first-order design choice, not a preprocessing detail. Filling at all is worth $8.1\,\mathrm{m}$, $96\%$ of the improvement the hold-length setting can deliver and a $29\%$ error reduction. How long a value is then held is worth the remaining $4\%$, from four seconds to unbounded. Once a value is available, the gain comes from removing noise rather than rebuilding the lost sample: a filtered channel estimate improves on a held raw sample, whereas filling backwards from future samples makes it worse. As that mechanism predicts, smoothing strength has a real interior optimum that is costly to miss in either direction. A smoother allowed to read the future gains only $0.55\,\mathrm{m}$, one fifteenth of what filling is worth, which bounds what any offline method can add. Three method families do not apply here for structural reasons rather than poor performance: two or more of the four channels are live in only $25\%$ of seconds, so the cross-channel structure generative imputation must learn is largely unobserved.

eess.SP↗
arXiv2026

Centroid Angle Estimation of Multiple Scatterers Using Monopulse Radar with Frequency Diversity

The monopulse technique determines the angle of a target by comparing signals from two narrow beams, yielding a precise angular estimate with low complexity. However, it struggles to resolve multiple closely spaced scatterers within the same resolution cell. Existing methods for estimating multiple scatterer angles involve complex signal processing and system modifications. We propose an effective method to estimate the angular centroid of scatterers using the mode of monopulse angle estimates. A semi-analytic expression for the angle estimate distribution is derived, confirming that its mode aligns with the centroid. To enhance estimation accuracy, we employ frequency diversity to reduce sample correlation. Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed method, demonstrating superior performance over conventional techniques with low complexity.

eess.SP↗
arXiv2026

Sensing-Aided Vehicular Beam Tracking: System Gain Over Link Feedback and Probe-Verified Sensing Invocation

Sensor-based beam prediction is usually evaluated against exhaustive beam training, leaving open when sensing adds useful information beyond a deployed tracker's link feedback and when it should be withheld. We separate system gain from the marginal value of sensing in action-restricted causal replay of recorded 64-beam sweeps from four vehicular DeepSense 6G scenarios. The replay exposes only serving-beam and explicitly probed candidate powers and counts probes and model invocations separately. The proposed controller combines a scheduled post-setup re-sweep with probe-verified sensing admission and blacklist backoff. In three scenarios where feedback-only tracking is within 0.25 dB of the recorded-sweep oracle, the controller stays close to feedback-only in mean loss while rarely invoking the model, whereas always-on sensing performs worse. In the sole high-innovation scenario, the controller's system gain is 0.82 dB (95% confidence interval [0.30, 1.40]) over the plain feedback-only tracker and 0.15 dB over a probe-limited re-sweeping reference, with fewer probes than either. Sensing and the re-sweep both correct setup lock loss. At the native decision interval, enabling sensing in the same controller yields no statistically resolved loss reduction but cuts probing by 21%. In this scenario, accurate sensing reduces loss relative to the sensor-disabled controller under emulated link noise, staleness or longer decision intervals. Weak or delayed sensing can instead increase loss despite probe verification. These exploratory results characterize sensing as a conditional substitute for RF probing or a source of loss reduction, depending on the limitations of link feedback and on the accuracy and timeliness of sensing.

eess.SP↗