Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.20329

Generation by lazy and invertible cellular automata over the Klein four-group

Abstract

Let $G=C_2\times C_2$ and $A=\{0,1\}$. We characterize the submonoid of $\text{CA}(G;A)$ generated by lazy and invertible cellular automata. A cellular automaton belongs to this submonoid if and only if, whenever it maps the two free $G$-orbits onto the same free orbit, it maps both constant configurations and some two-point orbit to the same constant. The proof gives a factorization using elementary orbit collapses and three two-cell lazy maps. The criterion yields the cardinality $59\,712$ and identifies the maps missed by a weaker constant-separation invariant. Adjoining one idempotent generates the full monoid, and the generated submonoid is contained in exactly one maximal proper submonoid, of cardinality $65\,024$. The submonoid generated by lazy maps alone has $4\,007$ elements, and for both generating sets the maximum shortest-word length is six. The criterion and the cardinalities $59\,712$ and $4\,007$ are formally verified in Lean.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Edgar Alcalá-Arroyo, Alonso Castillo-Ramirez, Haobo Ma, Wenlin Zhang. 2026-10-14. Generation by lazy and invertible cellular automata over the Klein four-group. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20329

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Left and right zero subsemigroups and an elementary approach to the Rees-Sushkevich Theorem

In a semigroup $S$ with idempotent $e$, the set of all elements $a$ of $S$ such that $ae=a$ and $ea=e$ forms the maximum left zero subsemigroup of $S$ containing $e$, and the set of all elements $b$ of $S$ such that $be=e$ and $eb=b$ forms the maximum right zero subsemigroup of $S$ containing $e$. We use these maximal right and left zero subsemigroups along with the maximal subgroups of a semigroup in the determination of maximal right and left subgroups, rectangular band subsemigroups, completely simple subsemigroups, rectangular subgroups, and completely $0$-simple subsemigroups. An elementary approach of the Rees-Sushkevich Theorem follows. Then we define rectangular $0$-bands and rectangular $0$-groups as completely $0$-simple analogues of rectangular bands and rectangular groups.

math.GR↗

Common overlattices in trees and trees with fins

Bass and Kulkarni proved that any pair of free uniform lattices in the automorphism group of a tree have conjugates that both lie inside a third uniform lattice (which is not necessarily free). We show that this does not generalise to trees with fins. The construction of our counter-example involves working with a certain generalisation of the universal groups of Burger and Mozes.

math.GR↗