Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.21776

ALMA2040: The High-Redshift Circumgalactic Medium. Imaging the fueling and feedback of galaxies in the early universe

Abstract

Galaxies do not form in isolation, but rather as part of a wider interconnected web mediated at their interface by an extended gaseous atmosphere - the Circum-Galactic Medium (CGM). This dynamic and multiphase region is fed and shaped by gas inflows and mergers from the intergalactic medium and by feedback-driven outflows and radiation from the central galaxy. The CGM is imprinted by the past, present and future evolution of its central galaxy and environment. The cool atomic and molecular phases are of particular interest as they dominate the mass budget of outflows and provide a reservoir of direct star forming fuel for the galaxy to accrete. In the early universe where accretion rates, mergers, and feedback processes peak, the cycle of gas through the CGM is most vigorous. Sub-mm observations have detected cold gas in extended halos and gas flows around high redshift galaxies but are thus far limited to the most massive, extreme or gravitationally lensed sources, using just a handful of the strongest emission and absorption lines. A significant increase ($5-10\times$) in spectral line sensitivity compared with the current ALMA is needed to push physical scales, densities and properties to a new regime. We present three key scientific cases for an ALMA2040 telescope: (i) direct imaging of extended [CII]-traced CGM halos around Milky-Way-progenitor galaxies at $z=4$-8; (ii) resolved detection of cold, clumpy outflows on $\sim$100 pc scales tied to individual star-forming clumps; and (iii) multi-species/-transition emission and absorption diagnostics that jointly constrain the density, chemistry, and radiation fields permeating the cool CGM and its multiphase gas flows.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kirsty M. Butler, Justin Spilker, Seiji Fujimoto, Manuel Aravena, Cecilia Bacchini, Leindert A. Boogaard, Stefano Carniani, Chiara Circosta, Pierre Cox, Rebecca Davies, Tanio Diaz-Santos, Daniel Espada, Andreas Faisst, Jonathan Freundlich, Mahsa Kohandel, Andrea Lapi, Umberto Maio, Dieu D. Nguyen, Andrea Pallottini, Mamta Pandey-Pommier, Antonio Pensabene, Miguel Pereira-Santaella, Matus Rybak, Francesco Salvestrini, Livia Vallini, Anita Zanella. 2026-10-15. ALMA2040: The High-Redshift Circumgalactic Medium. Imaging the fueling and feedback of galaxies in the early universe. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21776

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Significant Reductions in Expected Background Levels

We have used 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data to study what background levels are encountered in practice and how much they vary. The backgrounds vary considerably, with F115LP, F122M, F125LP, PR110L, and PR130L all showing over an order of magnitude of variation in background between observations, apparently due to changes in airglow. The F150LP and F165LP filters, which are dominated by dark rate, not airglow, exhibit a far smaller variation in backgrounds. For the filters where the background is generally dominated by airglow, the backgrounds measured from the data are significantly lower than what the ETC predicts (as of ETC v33.2). The ETC predictions for `average' airglow are greater than the median of our measured background values by factors of 2.51, 2.64, 105, and 3.64, for F115LP, F122M, F125LP, and F140LP, respectively. A preliminary analysis suggests this could be due to certain OI airglow lines usually being fainter than expected by the ETC. With reduced reduced background levels, the shorter-wavelength SBC filters can conduct background-limited observations much more rapidly than had previously been expected. As of ETC v34.1, a new option will be included for SBC calculations, allowing users to employ empirical background percentiles to estimate required exposure times.

astro-ph.IM↗

Using 23 Years of ACS/SBC Data to Understand Backgrounds: Explaining & Predicting Background Variations

Recent analysis of 23 years of Hubble Space Telescope ACS/SBC data has shown that background levels can vary considerably between observations, with most filters showing over an order of magnitude variation. For the shorter-wavelength filters, the background is understood to be dominated by airglow; however, what precisely drives background variations is not well constrained for any filter. Here, we explore the causes of the background variation. Using over 8,000 archival SBC observations, we developed a machine learning model that can accurately predict the background for an observation, based upon a set of 23 observational parameters. This model indicates that, depending on filter, the SBC background is generally dominated by Solar elevation, Solar separation angle, Earth limb angle of observation, SBC temperature, and target Galactic latitude.

astro-ph.IM↗

Beyond the BLUE I: the advantage ceiling - how much can any estimator beat the matched filter in mm/submm survey data?

Papers claiming that convolutional neural networks outperform the matched filter are now common in astronomy. Since that filter is the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) for any noise of given covariance, and the minimum-variance unbiased estimator under Gaussian noise, such a claim requires that the noise covariance varies from image to image or the noise is non-Gaussian. We introduce the advantage ceiling eta >= 1, which quantifies both cases: the Fisher information for the amplitude in units of the matched filter's, computable from noise-only simulations before any network is trained, and a bound on the variance of any estimator unbiased at each true amplitude. We compute eta for a suite of millimeter/submillimeter survey noise models and for compact and extended source templates, using a variational score-matching ladder whose rungs are estimator classes of increasing statistical order, from linear to convolutional. With an instrumental white-noise floor, Gaussian noise returns eta = 0.94-1.06 (+-0.04); covariance mixtures give exact ceilings of 10.2 (spectral tilt, extended source), 2.1 (leaked components) and 1.1-1.8 otherwise; residual artifacts give eta <= 1.09. Source confusion gives the largest advantage, eta >= 3.8 (extended) and >= 2.4 (compact). Three unmodelled channels - a zeroed DC mode, a missing white floor and floating-point rounding - can manufacture spurious advantages of up to two orders of magnitude. A ResNet regressor is 6-15% less efficient than the matched filter on Gaussian noise once prior shrinkage is divided out, and realizes a factor 1.8 of the 10.2 available on the spectral-tilt mixture; a companion paper tests such regressors against these ceilings.

astro-ph.IM↗