Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.21906

Planet formation on solar system scales

Abstract

Giant planets are often regarded as primordial protoplanetary "architects". Their formation and interactions with planetesimals and other planets during and after the protoplanetary disc phase are key to setting the blueprint of the planetary systems we observe today. Catching nascent gas giants is our best opportunity to uncover these crucial steps in the planet formation process and shed light on the origins of our own solar system. Over the last decade, ALMA has revolutionised our understanding of planet formation; still, detecting signatures of Jupiter-like planets has remained out of reach. We argue that ALMA2040, a next-generation sub(mm) interferometer with improved sensitivity ($\times25$ in the continuum and $\times10$ for line emission) and a $\times3$ higher angular resolution compared to ALMA, will be sensitive to (sub)mm emission around a forming Jupiter-like planet orbiting a Sun-like star within $150\,{\rm pc}$ and allow kinematically characterising interactions of Jovian and sub-Jovian planets with their natal disc. ALMA2040 will provide unique and unprecedented insights into how gas giants carve gaps, accrete material, form satellites, and affect the architectures of their co-evolving planetary systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Francesco Zagaria, Andrés F. Izquierdo, Jaehan Bae, Philippine Griveaud, Richard A. Booth, Pietro Curone, Anders Johansen, Stefano Facchini, Myriam Benisty, Tilman Birnstiel, Alice Booth, Ondřej Chrenko, Ian Czekala, Kiyoaki Doi, Greta Guidi, Mihkel Kama, Quentin Kral, Charles Law, Giuseppe Lodato, Patricia Luppe, Enrique Macias, Liton Majumdar, Rebecca Nealon, Anna Penzlin, Danae Polychroni, Daniel J. Price, Álvaro Ribas, Richard Teague, Claudia Toci, Diego Turrini, Antranik A. Sefilian, Yuhito Shibaike, Dimitris Stamatellos, Ewa Szuszkiewicz, Catherine Walsh. 2026-10-15. Planet formation on solar system scales. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21906

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Radiation-Hardened, Fault-Aware Quantized Neural Network That Self-Heals

Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly being deployed into radiation-challenging environments in spacecraft, particle accelerators, and, soon, space-based data centers. Instantiated as a learned orchestration of numbers stored in persistent memory, models are susceptible to continual degradation as high-energy particles corrupt data. At inference time, new data passed through the network fundamentally break the off-line assumptions and guarantees of a static model determined during training. To preserve the quality and efficacy of the models, fault tolerance against bit flips is a clear objective. In this work we developed a runtime method for repairing the quantized weights of neural networks (NNs) after bit flips on commodity, commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware, without storing extra replicas. Our work extends the well-established Fault-Aware Training (FAT) paradigm by adding an alignment penalty to concentrate undamaged activations and weights into a low-rank subspace, and we then reconstruct flagged corrupted coordinates from the uncorrupted survivors. We call this method {\it Projection Healing} and apply it to six regression benchmarks on quantized NNs. Holding a FAT checkpoint fixed and toggling only the runtime heal gives a further ${\sim}23\%$ reduction in the native-unit excess integral. Across those datasets the method extends the operational scrub interval by a median of $2.04\times$ at a $+5\%$ RMSE degradation and $1.96\times$ at $+50\%$, compared with $1.62\times$ and $1.07\times$ for classical Single Error Correction, Double Error Detection (SECDED). This introduces a new path towards designing resilient data-driven models, complementing established hardware redundancy, ECC, and FAT-based techniques.

astro-ph.IM↗

Gaussian process-based Bayesian imaging of bolometric (sub-)millimetre data

Widefield single-dish telescopes operating at (sub-)mm wavelengths ($λ\sim 4$~mm to 350~$μ$m) tend to feature much faster mapping speeds than radio interferometers at the same wavelengths, and are more suitable for measuring signals on larger spatial scales. However, the data are dominated by atmospheric fluctuations on large scales and by photon and instrumental noise on smaller scales, making it difficult to recover the true astronomical sky. We build on maria-nifty, a Gaussian process-based Bayesian imaging framework for reconstructing sky maps from single-dish telescope data, implemented on top of Numerical Information Field Theory (NIFTy). It uses modular generative models to efficiently separate the astronomical signal from atmospheric emission while providing pixel-wise uncertainty quantification for the reconstructed sky maps. Moreover, our method cleanly separates individual astrophysical signals, even though they are superposed on the sky. Following its successful validation on synthetic time-ordered data generated using the maria software, we apply it to real data observed with the MUSTANG-2 bolometric array on the 100-meter Green Bank Telescope. For the galaxy cluster RXJ1347.5-1145, we separate the extended cluster emission from the compact source at its centre and obtain a smoother map with fewer artefacts compared to a standard maximum-likelihood reconstruction using the same data. The JAX-based implementation and GPU acceleration provide the basis for applying the method to the vastly larger datasets that the next generation of single-dish telescopes will deliver.

astro-ph.IM↗

Estimator Precision and Selection for Up-the-Ramp Sampling with a High-Read-Noise InGaAs Camera

The noise properties of an InGaAs camera vary with gain, requiring a trade-off between implementation complexity and precision. Using generalized least squares (GLS) with known covariance as the precision benchmark, we examine the applicability and precision penalties of ordinary least squares (OLS) and correlated double sampling (CDS) at different noise operating points. We define $η=fT/σ_\mathrm{R}^2$, where $f$ is the total pixel count rate, $T$ the fitting span, and $σ_\mathrm{R}$ the single-read noise. For constant flux, uniform sampling, and independent white read noise plus Poisson noise, established finite-sampling variance expressions give equal OLS and CDS variances at $η=10$ for $N\ge4$ reads; OLS is favored below this boundary and CDS above it. Analytical and Monte Carlo comparisons for three gain modes quantify the precision loss of the better simplified estimator relative to GLS. In high-gain on-sky data, choosing OLS at 20 s and CDS at 90 s increases the background residual standard deviation by 3.55% and 3.01%, respectively, relative to two-iteration feasible GLS (FGLS). Photometry of 21 common sources does not clearly resolve most estimator differences. The observed OLS-CDS crossover occurs earlier than the ideal prediction, indicating that temporal covariance beyond the ideal model also affects the selection boundary. Observational validation is limited to high gain; medium- and low-gain choices rely on theory and simulations using calibrated parameters. OLS or CDS can replace GLS with a small precision penalty at suitable operating points. The ideal criterion provides an initial selection rule, whose practical boundary requires validation against observed temporal covariance.

astro-ph.IM↗