Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.22899

Provable Authority: A Protocol for Verifiable Authority Resolution and Control Across Human, Organizational, and Agentic Transactions

Abstract

Payment systems authenticate users, devices, accounts, and cryptographic credentials, but a relying party, such as a counterparty, payment rail, marketplace, or autonomous agent runtime, generally cannot obtain compact, independently verifiable evidence that the party presenting one exact transaction holds current organizational authority to execute it under the applicable evidence, policy, budget, and approval state. Agentic commerce makes this gap operationally urgent: a software agent can produce a valid signature while acting outside its delegated purpose, after its sponsor's authority has changed, or on transaction details that differ from those a human approved. We describe the ChainIT Authority Protocol, a subject-neutral and rail-neutral pre-execution authority and evidence control plane. The protocol separates durable identity, a versioned organizational authority record (the Authority Resolution Pactvera), sourced evidence assertions, deterministic reason-coded policy predicates, and organization-configured dispositions; binds each decision and human approval to a canonical transaction digest; reserves capacity atomically so that limits hold under concurrency; and authorizes commit only through a single-use, sender-constrained Execution Authorization Credential consumed at the rail adapter, with append-only lifecycle evidence sealed after the terminal outcome. An Agent Subject Profile adds the workload registration, attested key hierarchy, and sovereignty boundary required when the acting subject is an AI agent, without introducing a separate authority concept. We specify the commit-time execution predicate and bounded-freshness status rules, give enforcement profiles for fiat (ACH, wire, card, instant payment) and stablecoin rails, and state residual risks and non-goals.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jeremy Blackburn, Tim Hines, Matthew Koepp, Russell Lessard, Jason Patrick. 2026-10-16. Provable Authority: A Protocol for Verifiable Authority Resolution and Control Across Human, Organizational, and Agentic Transactions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22899

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Gradient-Optimized TSK Fuzzy Framework for Explainable Phishing Detection

Phishing attacks represent an increasingly sophisticated and pervasive threat to individuals and organizations, causing significant financial losses, identity theft, and severe damage to institutional reputations. Existing phishing detection methods often struggle to simultaneously achieve high accuracy and explainability, either failing to detect novel attacks or operating as opaque black-box models. To address this critical gap, we propose a novel phishing URL detection system based on a first-order Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy inference model optimized through gradient-based techniques. Our approach intelligently combines the interpretability and human-like reasoning capabilities of fuzzy logic with the precision and adaptability provided by gradient optimization methods, specifically leveraging the Adam optimizer for efficient parameter tuning. Experiments conducted using a comprehensive dataset of over 235,000 URLs demonstrate rapid convergence, exceptional predictive performance (accuracy averaging 99.95% across 5 cross-validation folds, with a perfect AUC i.e. 1.00). Furthermore, optimized fuzzy rules and membership functions improve interoperability, clearly indicating how the model makes decisions - an essential feature for cybersecurity applications. This high-performance, transparent, and interpretable phishing detection framework significantly advances current cybersecurity defenses, providing practitioners with accurate and explainable decision-making tools.

cs.CR↗

An AI Approach to Verified Production Cryptographic Libraries

Cryptographic code is critical infrastructure that must be correct, yet formally verifying production libraries remains difficult. Existing language-model proof systems solve isolated obligations with specifications and premises already given, leaving production-library verification unresolved. We present CryptoProver, an AI-based system that synthesizes internal specifications and Verus-checked proofs from high-level API contracts. Without changing executable code, CryptoProver constructs a new independent proof of curve25519-dalek and verifies RustCrypto's previously unverified chacha20 implementation against an RFC 8439 specification. These cryptographic lineages underpin deployed systems including Signal and Shadowsocks; Signal has an estimated 218M global downloads. The original developers report a focused five-month, three-person effort to verify curve25519-dalek. Given the API contracts and a fixed trusted library of field specifications, arithmetic facts, axioms, and vstd, CryptoProver synthesizes the internal specifications and proofs in 11.4 hours with USD 466.99 in recorded API cost. CryptoProver follows a trust-first design principle: mechanical gates reject specification weakening, invented axioms, and cross-module breakage, while isolation blocks reference proof retrieval, including from git history.

cs.CR↗

Capability-Gated Language Models: Security Composes, Utility Does Not

Deployed language model safeguards (safety fine-tuning, filtering, unlearning) vary by principal only outside the model weights: filters are reconfigured, tiers are multiplied, and artefacts are reissued; inside one set of weights every request meets the same model configuration. This motivates us to define capability-gated deployment: per-principal access control inside one set of weights, whose configurations form a lattice - meets accumulate a principal's restrictions and joins pool a coalition's reach. We instantiate it by sparse rank gating over an existing nested-factorisation mechanism, guide profile search with one-pass attribution, and read every result once from a pre-registered held-out split. Security approximately composes: provably exactly at meets under a monotone-elicitation assumption we falsify pointwise. In two lineages the median held-out meet deepens suppression; the one effect surviving correction strengthens it. Utility does not: individually harmless profiles can compose to retention and fluency damage, and no compositional bound exists.

cs.CR↗