Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.23212

Regulating for an AI Commons: Adopting, sustaining, and defending people-first innovation trajectories

Abstract

Technological principles of openness, interoperability, and decentralization are integral to building an AI economy that is accountable to the public and truly responsive to local needs and constraints. However, Big Tech's firm control over essential elements of the stack (such as chips, cloud, models, data, and talent) limits valuable alternatives from reaching the scale necessary for sustained growth. Worse still, hyperscalers continue to enclose and extract value from publicly funded and volunteer-driven technologies without adequately distributing these returns. We see consolidated power within a few entities and "enshittification" of once-transformative innovations. Embedding ethical micro-level tools (like open data repositories or small-language models) into workflows is promising, but without a consistent innovation strategy, they also often end up perpetuating and being appropriated by the same exploitative trajectories. Instead, this whitepaper outlines a three-pillared holistic and intentional policy approach that i) actively pushes for the adoption of cooperative technologies in existing and emerging systems, ii) sets up collective institutional structures to sustain and maintain them in the long-term, and iii) introduces regulatory proposals that limit private entities from disempowering them through uncontrolled enclosure and extraction. Through desk research and purpose-specific case studies, we argue for the importance of such an approach in the Global South, where structural constraints around infrastructure, financing, and policy governance make it difficult for AI commons and cooperative AI tools to emerge and survive. The paper concludes with key open questions for campaigners, policy advocates, researchers, and grassroots organizers to consider and explore while working towards peoples' solidarity within and between Global South countries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Abhineet Nayyar, Mallory Knodel, Kimberlee Weatherall, Gunn Jiravuttipong. 2026-10-16. Regulating for an AI Commons: Adopting, sustaining, and defending people-first innovation trajectories. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23212

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Delegations as Adaptive Representation Patterns: Rethinking Influence in Liquid Democracy

Liquid democracy is a mechanism for the division of labor in decision-making through the transitive delegation of influence. In essence, all individuals possess the autonomy to determine the issues with which they will engage directly, while for other matters, they may appoint a representative of their choosing. So far, the literature has studied the delegation structures emerging in liquid democracy as static. As a result, transitivity defined as the capacity to transfer acquired authority to another entity, has been identified as a concern as it would be conducive to unrestrained accumulation of power. Focusing on the implementation of liquid democracy supported by the LiquidFeedback software, we propose a novel approach to assessing the influence of voting nodes in a transitive delegation graph, taking into account the process nature of real-world liquid democracy in which delegation and voting are distinct and increasingly independent activities. By introducing a novel model of delegations in liquid democracy, we show how transitivity may in fact contribute to an effective regulation of deliberation influence and decision-making power. While maintaining the one-person, one-vote paradigm for all votes cast, the anticipated influence of an agent, to the extent it is stemming from transitivity, experiences a precipitous decline following an exponential trajectory. In general, it is our objective to move the first steps towards a rigorous analysis of liquid democracy as an adaptive democratic representation process. The adaptivity aspect of liquid democracy has not yet been explored within the existing academic literature despite it being, we believe, one of its most important features. We therefore also outline a research agenda focusing on this aspect of liquid democracy.

cs.CY↗

Semantic Alignment Between Normative Theories of Ethics and the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act: A Transformer-Based Semantic Textual Similarity Analysis

The European Union Artificial Intelligence (EU AI) Act, which explicitly references fundamental rights and ethical principles, is a comprehensive regulatory framework for governing Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. This study examines the Act's possible moral grounding by analyzing the semantic alignment between three normative theories of ethics--virtue ethics, deontological ethics, and consequentialism--and the Act's regulatory language. Drawing on the philosophy of law, in which both antipositivist and some positivist accounts recognize an overlap between moral and legal norms, the relationship between the theories and the Act is treated as one of association. The encyclopedic descriptions of the theories serve as source documents, and the Act serves as the target document, analyzed in two target sections: its preamble and its statutory provisions. Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) is used as an indicator of association. The source documents are manually preprocessed to reduce semantic overlap among them. In all documents, each sentence is encoded by eight Transformer-based sentence encoders (SBERT, ALBERT, DistilBERT, RoBERTa, TinyBERT, MiniLM, E5-base, and GTE-base), and embeddings are aggregated to the document level by centroid cosine similarity, hierarchical sentence-block aggregation (HSBA; blocks of 3, 5, and 10 sentences), and mean pairwise sentence similarity. Because raw similarity scales differ across encoders, encoders are combined by voting on rankings. Deontological ethics shows the highest association with both target sections in all eight encoders and under every aggregation method, and the preamble is more closely associated with every source document than the provisions are. Consequentialism ranks second at the document level, but its position relative to virtue ethics depends on the granularity of aggregation.

cs.CY↗

MAVE: A Multi-Agent Framework for Grounded Pedagogical Feedback from Online Class Videos

Timely pedagogical feedback is difficult to scale in online classes, where long and noisy videos make student responses hard to locate and automated systems often produce generic advice weakly grounded in actual classroom behavior. The key challenge is to connect the instructional goal of a specific lesson segment with temporally aligned multimodal evidence of student responses, and then translate the observed gap into an actionable teaching move. We introduce MAVE (Multi-Agents for Video-based Educational Feedback), a multi-agent framework for grounded pedagogical feedback from online-class videos. MAVE decomposes feedback generation into four roles: the Curator structures the lesson and infers expected student activity; the Observer extracts aligned speech, visual, and interaction evidence; the Assessor estimates the activity supported by student behavior; and the Advisor generates gap-conditioned teaching recommendations. To evaluate this capability, we introduce MAVEBench, a benchmark designed to measure whether feedback systems can ground diagnoses in multimodal student evidence, and generate actionable pedagogical feedback. MAVEBench contains 173 knowledge-point segments from approximately 20 hours of authentic online-class videos across STEM and Humanities, together with comprehensive simulation. Experiments show that MAVE outperforms direct prompting, Reflexion, and TextGrad in diagnostic correctness, instructional alignment, and actionability. Our code is available at https://github.com/DaRL-GenAI/MAVE

cs.CY↗