Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.23614

Water-Energy-Data nexus reveals sustainability gaps and priorities for AI infrastructure

Abstract

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) depends on interconnected water, energy, and data systems spanning infrastructure life cycles and diverse geographies, with the potential to intensify water and energy insecurity, exacerbate social inequities and lead to cascading sustainability issues globally. Yet assessments commonly examine them separately, limiting our understanding of where resource pressures arise, how they are transferred across space, and who bears their consequences. To address these challenges, we established a water-energy-data (WED) nexus framework that captures the spatial and life-cycle dependencies of AI infrastructure, and use large language models to synthesize 12,825 water- or energy-related studies across four resource-intensive AI infrastructure activities: mineral extraction, semiconductor manufacturing, data center operation and electronic-waste processing. The evidence map identifies a mismatch between the interconnected activities supporting AI infrastructure and boundaries used to assess them. Researchers assess operational energy more than water use and other indirect demands, while interactions across locations and life-cycle activities remain understudied. These gaps obscure how resource demands shift among infrastructure nodes and regions, and how data-enabled benefits compare with their underlying costs. The WED nexus provides a foundation for integrated assessment of spatially metacoupled systems, while the evidence map can inform priorities for managing the sustainability implications of the AI boom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jincheng Huang, Guoan Xiao, Xin Lan, Caichun Yin, Zhimeng Jiang, Yue Cui, Jianguo Liu. 2026-10-16. Water-Energy-Data nexus reveals sustainability gaps and priorities for AI infrastructure. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23614

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Delegations as Adaptive Representation Patterns: Rethinking Influence in Liquid Democracy

Liquid democracy is a mechanism for the division of labor in decision-making through the transitive delegation of influence. In essence, all individuals possess the autonomy to determine the issues with which they will engage directly, while for other matters, they may appoint a representative of their choosing. So far, the literature has studied the delegation structures emerging in liquid democracy as static. As a result, transitivity defined as the capacity to transfer acquired authority to another entity, has been identified as a concern as it would be conducive to unrestrained accumulation of power. Focusing on the implementation of liquid democracy supported by the LiquidFeedback software, we propose a novel approach to assessing the influence of voting nodes in a transitive delegation graph, taking into account the process nature of real-world liquid democracy in which delegation and voting are distinct and increasingly independent activities. By introducing a novel model of delegations in liquid democracy, we show how transitivity may in fact contribute to an effective regulation of deliberation influence and decision-making power. While maintaining the one-person, one-vote paradigm for all votes cast, the anticipated influence of an agent, to the extent it is stemming from transitivity, experiences a precipitous decline following an exponential trajectory. In general, it is our objective to move the first steps towards a rigorous analysis of liquid democracy as an adaptive democratic representation process. The adaptivity aspect of liquid democracy has not yet been explored within the existing academic literature despite it being, we believe, one of its most important features. We therefore also outline a research agenda focusing on this aspect of liquid democracy.

cs.CY↗

Semantic Alignment Between Normative Theories of Ethics and the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act: A Transformer-Based Semantic Textual Similarity Analysis

The European Union Artificial Intelligence (EU AI) Act, which explicitly references fundamental rights and ethical principles, is a comprehensive regulatory framework for governing Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. This study examines the Act's possible moral grounding by analyzing the semantic alignment between three normative theories of ethics--virtue ethics, deontological ethics, and consequentialism--and the Act's regulatory language. Drawing on the philosophy of law, in which both antipositivist and some positivist accounts recognize an overlap between moral and legal norms, the relationship between the theories and the Act is treated as one of association. The encyclopedic descriptions of the theories serve as source documents, and the Act serves as the target document, analyzed in two target sections: its preamble and its statutory provisions. Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) is used as an indicator of association. The source documents are manually preprocessed to reduce semantic overlap among them. In all documents, each sentence is encoded by eight Transformer-based sentence encoders (SBERT, ALBERT, DistilBERT, RoBERTa, TinyBERT, MiniLM, E5-base, and GTE-base), and embeddings are aggregated to the document level by centroid cosine similarity, hierarchical sentence-block aggregation (HSBA; blocks of 3, 5, and 10 sentences), and mean pairwise sentence similarity. Because raw similarity scales differ across encoders, encoders are combined by voting on rankings. Deontological ethics shows the highest association with both target sections in all eight encoders and under every aggregation method, and the preamble is more closely associated with every source document than the provisions are. Consequentialism ranks second at the document level, but its position relative to virtue ethics depends on the granularity of aggregation.

cs.CY↗

MAVE: A Multi-Agent Framework for Grounded Pedagogical Feedback from Online Class Videos

Timely pedagogical feedback is difficult to scale in online classes, where long and noisy videos make student responses hard to locate and automated systems often produce generic advice weakly grounded in actual classroom behavior. The key challenge is to connect the instructional goal of a specific lesson segment with temporally aligned multimodal evidence of student responses, and then translate the observed gap into an actionable teaching move. We introduce MAVE (Multi-Agents for Video-based Educational Feedback), a multi-agent framework for grounded pedagogical feedback from online-class videos. MAVE decomposes feedback generation into four roles: the Curator structures the lesson and infers expected student activity; the Observer extracts aligned speech, visual, and interaction evidence; the Assessor estimates the activity supported by student behavior; and the Advisor generates gap-conditioned teaching recommendations. To evaluate this capability, we introduce MAVEBench, a benchmark designed to measure whether feedback systems can ground diagnoses in multimodal student evidence, and generate actionable pedagogical feedback. MAVEBench contains 173 knowledge-point segments from approximately 20 hours of authentic online-class videos across STEM and Humanities, together with comprehensive simulation. Experiments show that MAVE outperforms direct prompting, Reflexion, and TextGrad in diagnostic correctness, instructional alignment, and actionability. Our code is available at https://github.com/DaRL-GenAI/MAVE

cs.CY↗