Equivalence testing and run-count design for stochastic machine-learning experiments

Dmytro Knopov; Nadiya Shvai

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.23700

Equivalence testing and run-count design for stochastic machine-learning experiments

Dmytro Knopov·Nadiya Shvai

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Claims that two training methods perform equally well often rest on a non-significant difference between two or three runs per method. We develop a protocol, with its power theory, for certifying practical equivalence in per-run metrics such as the AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). It rests on a two-level (seed x item) variance model separating between-run dispersion from item-level noise. Equivalence within a pre-specified margin is tested by two one-sided tests (TOST), equivalently by a confidence interval inside the margin; a two-level bootstrap covers composite statistics. A closed-form formula converts a margin and a target power into runs per method; its shifted-t refinement is calibrated against the realised two-level process. Simulations on a 270-cell grid and under non-Gaussian seed laws confirm the formula within its design-relevant range, from five runs per method. For four published runs of a joint energy-based model, the failure to certify equivalence was largely decided by design: with the variance calibrated to those runs, two per method certify with probability near three per cent, whereas certifying 0.01 AUROC at 80 per cent power needs twelve even under exact equality. A second case study on a thousand-seed CIFAR-10 zoo and the MultiBERTs checks the formula against real seed laws (within 0.05 in that range) and resolves comparisons that two or three runs leave undecided. In a two-stage design (pilot, then formula), our experiments suggest that an upper confidence bound on the pilot variance substantially reduces the undersizing seen with its point estimate.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG stat.ML

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Dmytro Knopov, Nadiya Shvai. 2026-10-16. Equivalence testing and run-count design for stochastic machine-learning experiments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23700

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Solving Inverse Problems via Diffusion-Based Priors: An Approximation-Free Ensemble Sampling Approach

Diffusion models (DMs) have proven to be effective in modeling high-dimensional distributions, leading to their widespread adoption for representing complex priors in Bayesian inverse problems (BIPs). However, current DM-based posterior sampling methods proposed for solving common BIPs rely on heuristic approximations to the generative process. To exploit the generative capability of DMs and avoid the usage of such approximations, we propose an ensemble-based algorithm that performs posterior sampling without the use of heuristic approximations. Our algorithm is motivated by existing work that combines DM-based methods with the sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) method. By examining how the prior evolves through the diffusion process encoded by the pre-trained score function, we derive a modified partial differential equation (PDE) governing the evolution of the corresponding posterior distribution. This PDE includes a modified diffusion term and a reweighting term, which can be simulated via stochastic weighted particle methods. Theoretically, we prove that the error between the true posterior and the empirical distribution of the generated samples can be bounded in terms of the training error of the pre-trained score function and the number of particles in the ensemble. Empirically, we validate our algorithm on several inverse problems in imaging to show that our method gives more accurate reconstructions compared to existing DM-based methods. Our code is available at the following Github repository~\url{https://github.com/HaoxuanSteveC00/AFDPS-TMLR}.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Optimal hypersurface decision trees

Optimal decision trees have attracted increasing attention in recent years, yet existing algorithms face two closely related challenges. First, the trees they construct have limited expressivity because their splitting rules are typically restricted to axis-parallel splits or binary features. Second, these algorithms generally scale poorly to large datasets. These challenges compound one another: more expressive splitting rules increase the combinatorial complexity of the search space, making the resulting optimal decision tree (ODT) problem even more difficult to solve. Building on the proper decision tree framework of \citet{he2025odt}, we propose, to the best of our knowledge, the first algorithm for constructing optimal decision trees with hypersurface splits. The algorithm has worst-case work complexity $O\left(K!K N^{KG+1}\right)$ when $N\geq K$ and fixed-dimensional feasibility tests are treated as constant-cost operations, where $G=\binom{D+M}{M}-1$ depends on the hypersurface polynomial degree $M$ and the data dimension $D$. Its structure is naturally amenable to vectorization and parallelization, enabling efficient execution on GPUs, and the generic algorithm design can be used to accelerate other ODT variants, such as axis-parallel decision (ADT) trees. We further develop a safe pruning strategy that substantially reduces the number of candidate configurations and an incremental generation procedure that reduces the associated feasibility-checking cost from $O(K^2)$ to $O(K)$.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

SPRINT: Stochastic Performative Prediction With Variance Reduction

Performative prediction (PP) is an algorithmic framework for optimizing machine learning (ML) models where the model's deployment affects the distribution of the data it is trained on. Compared to traditional ML with fixed data, designing algorithms in PP converging to a stable point -- known as a stationary performative stable (SPS) solution -- is more challenging than the counterpart in conventional ML tasks due to the model-induced distribution shifts. While considerable efforts have been made to find SPS solutions using methods such as repeated gradient descent (RGD) and greedy stochastic gradient descent (SGD-GD), most prior studies assumed a strongly convex loss until a recent work established $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ convergence of SGD-GD to SPS solutions under smooth, non-convex losses. However, this latest progress is still based on the restricted bounded variance assumption in stochastic gradient estimates and yields convergence bounds with a non-vanishing error neighborhood that scales with the variance. This limitation motivates us to improve convergence rates and reduce error in stochastic optimization for PP, particularly in non-convex settings. Thus, we propose a new algorithm called stochastic performative prediction with variance reduction (SPRINT) and establish its convergence to an SPS solution at a rate of $O(1/T)$. Notably, the resulting error neighborhood is independent of the variance of the stochastic gradients. Experiments on multiple real datasets with non-convex models demonstrate that SPRINT outperforms SGD-GD in both convergence rate and stability.

cs.LG↗