Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.23708

"To Boldly Go Where No One Has Gone Before" What Has AI Let Developers Unlock?

Rudrajit Choudhuri·Jenna L. Butler·Christian Bird·Carmen Badea·Brian Houck·Anita Sarma
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Measuring AI by how much faster developers work is like judging electricity by how much faster it spun a steam-era factory. A fuller measure asks what new work becomes possible. We surveyed 331 software developers at Microsoft about what AI lets them do that they could not do before and analyzed their answers using reflexive thematic analysis with a human-in-the-loop, multi-model AI council. Developers described doing familiar work faster (Faster, 45%), undertaking work previously beyond their reach (Further, 36.9%), and taking on new kinds of work centered on building for and directing AI agents (Afresh, 12.4%). Across these accounts, learning and scaffolding ran in both directions: developers learned new skills with AI while externalizing their tacit knowledge as the context and standards that guide AI's work. Drawing on Vygotsky's zone of proximal development, we frame developers and AI as joint learners whose zones meet at the skill-judgment nexus: AI can supply skill faster than it can reliably judge its own work, and developers must continuously bridge that gap. Whether they do sets them on one of two paths. On one, developers' judgment grows alongside AI's skill, and they codify what they learn so the loop keeps turning. On the other, they become hollow orchestrators, approving work they can no longer judge and losing the identity and meaning they once drew from it. Based on our findings, we offer a two-way scaffolding playbook to help developers, teams, and tool builders take the first path.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rudrajit Choudhuri, Jenna L. Butler, Christian Bird, Carmen Badea, Brian Houck, Anita Sarma. 2026-10-16. "To Boldly Go Where No One Has Gone Before" What Has AI Let Developers Unlock?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23708

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

JumpStarter: Human-AI Planning with Task-Structured Context Curation

Human-AI collaboration on complex planning goals is bottlenecked by how LLM interfaces handle context: users must manually curate and re-surface relevant information across long and unstructured chat histories. Despite advances in long-context prompting and memory-augmented retrieval, this burden remains unresolved: users still have to identify and supply the right context at each decision point, regardless of how much the model can store or surface. We propose JumpStarter, a system that enables LLMs to collaborate with humans on complex goals by dynamically decomposing tasks to help users manage context. We specifically introduce task-structured context curation, a framework that breaks down a user's goal into a hierarchy of actionable subtasks and scopes context to localized decision points, enabling finer-grained personalization and reuse. The framework is realized through three core mechanisms: context elicitation, selection, and reuse. In a within-subjects user study, plans produced with JumpStarter were rated substantially higher in quality than those produced with ChatGPT. A complementary automatic simulation study shows that JumpStarter consistently outperforms ChatGPT baselines, planning and memory agents, and workflow ablations. These findings show that effective human-AI planning depends not on the volume of context provided, but on attaching the right context to the right subtask at the right time.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

What Drives Students' Use of AI Chatbots? Technology Acceptance in Conversational AI

Conversational AI tools have been rapidly adopted by students and are becoming part of their learning routines. This widespread use comes amid ongoing concerns about the reliability of AI-generated responses and the appropriate role of AI in education. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model, we examine how students' perceptions of conversational AI, including its usefulness, ease of use, trustworthiness, enjoyment, and social influence, relate to their intentions to use these tools for learning. We investigate both the direct and indirect relationships among these perceptions to understand how they are associated with students' behavioral intentions. Using survey data from 229 students and partial least squares structural equation modeling, we found that perceived usefulness was the strongest direct predictor of intention, followed by perceived enjoyment. Perceived ease of use, trust, and subjective norms did not have significant direct associations with intention. However, trust and subjective norms had significant total indirect associations, while perceived enjoyment had both significant direct and indirect associations. The model explained 70.2% of the variance in behavioral intention. These findings suggest that students' intentions to use conversational AI are associated less directly with effort-related considerations and more with perceived usefulness and affective experience. They also highlight the importance of understanding what students perceive as valuable in conversational AI interactions, particularly when designing tools intended to encourage engagement while supporting learning.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

GazeAgent: VLM-Guided Implicit Gaze Calibration from Egocentric Multimodal Behavior for AI Glasses

AI glasses typically require explicit, user-specific eye-tracker calibration, and accuracy can drift when the device shifts during use. We present GazeAgent, a VLM-guided framework that continuously and adaptively improves gaze-calibration accuracy from naturally occurring behavior without asking users to interrupt their activities. GazeAgent identifies precise visual attention (PVA) events from multimodal streams of inertial measurement unit (IMU), gaze, and wearer-hand signals, validates their task relevance, and localizes functional targets as pseudo-calibration targets. In a 10-participant scripted study, the system detected all 820 predefined PVA opportunities and, under device disturbance, reduced median gaze error by 44.1% compared with explicit calibration. In a five-participant case study, autonomous calibration produced the lowest workload and interruption ratings, and all participants preferred it for routine use. By deriving task-critical targets from natural multimodal behavior, GazeAgent demonstrates the potential for continuous, adaptive, and low-burden gaze interaction on egocentric AI glasses.

cs.HC↗