Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24220

Hidden Trajectories Don't Lie: Correcting Corruption Drift for Test-Time Adaptation

Amirhossein Sabour·Amir Khasahmadi·Mengliu Zhao
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Test-time adaptation (TTA) adapts pretrained models to distribution shifts encountered during deployment. However, most existing methods rely on the weight representations of the final layer or signals derived from the model's output probability distribution. We study hidden trajectories: the ordered sequence of intermediate representations produced across a deep neural network. We observe that clean and corrupted trajectories become more separable as corruption severity increases. We introduce Drift-TTA, which adds zero-initialized low-rank adapters to a frozen backbone and trains them to align corrupted hidden trajectories with those from cleaner inputs. The approach supports two variants: a source-dependent version trained with clean targets, and a source-free setting that learns from corrupted images at different severities. We develop an online TTA approach that freezes the backbone and adapters while updating a scalar gate to control adaptation strength. We further cast trajectory alignment as MAP inference under a Gaussian observation model and derive a KL-based transfer bound characterizing test-time trajectory misalignment in terms of offline residual error, residual dimensionality, and distribution shift between offline and test corruptions. We evaluate Drift-TTA on CIFAR-10-C, CIFAR-100-C, and ImageNet-C using supervised ViTs and CLIP models. On CIFAR-100-C at severity 5, our source-free online approach improves accuracy over no TTA by 13.3 percentage points with ViT-B/16 and 11.6 percentage points with CLIP ViT-B/16, reaching 74.9% and 47.4%, respectively. Under the same setting, prior TTA baselines yield ECEs of 18.00% for ViT and 14.70% for CLIP, while our approach reduces them to 9.53% and 5.77%, respectively. These results demonstrate that hidden trajectory alignment provides an effective signal for both offline correction and lightweight online test-time adaptation.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amirhossein Sabour, Amir Khasahmadi, Mengliu Zhao. 2026-10-16. Hidden Trajectories Don't Lie: Correcting Corruption Drift for Test-Time Adaptation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24220

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Heterogeneous Sheaf Neural Networks

Heterogeneous graphs, whose nodes and edges can belong to different types and feature spaces, arise in many real-world domains, including biology, recommendation, social networks, and computer systems. Existing heterogeneous graph neural networks typically handle this heterogeneity at the architectural level through relation-specific modules, meta-path machinery or type-aware attention, which often leads to increasingly specialised parameter-heavy designs. In this work, we propose HetSheaf, a framework for learning heterogeneous graphs through cellular sheaves. Instead of encoding heterogeneity solely in the architecture, HetSheaf represents it directly in the underlying data structure by assigning type-aware local feature spaces and learning restriction maps conditioned on node features, node types, and edge types. To support graph-level prediction, we further introduce SheafPool, a universal stalk-space readout that aggregates node representations while being invariant to local changes of basis, thereby making graph classification with sheaf networks well-defined and achieving an F1 Score up to 42 percentage points higher than mean pooling. Across a diverse suite of benchmarks (node classification, link prediction and graph classification). HetSheaf consistently achieves up to 2 percentage points higher performance (up to 94.97% Macro F1 Score on node classification and up to 99.62% on link prediction) on the Heterogeneous Graph Benchmark (HGB) framework against homogeneous (GCN, GAT, GIN, GraphSAGE), heterogeneous (R-GCN, HAT, HGT) and type-agnostic sheaf baselines, while reducing the number of parameters by up to 10$\times$.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Risk-averse learning with delayed feedback

In real-world scenarios, risk-averse learning is valuable for mitigating potential adverse outcomes. However, the delayed feedback makes it challenging to assess and manage risk effectively. In this paper, we investigate risk-averse learning using Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) as risk measure, while incorporating feedback with random but bounded delays. We develop two risk-averse learning algorithms that rely on one-point and two-point zeroth-order optimization approaches, respectively. The dynamic regrets of the algorithms are analyzed in terms of the cumulative delay and the number of total samplings. In the absence of delay, the regret bounds match the established bounds of zeroth-order stochastic gradient methods for risk-averse learning. Furthermore, the two-point risk-averse learning outperforms the one-point algorithm by achieving a smaller regret bound. We provide numerical experiments on a dynamic pricing problem to demonstrate the performance of the algorithms.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

On the Value of Cross-Modal Misalignment in Multimodal Representation Learning

Multimodal representation learning, exemplified by multimodal contrastive learning (MMCL) using image-text pairs, aims to learn powerful representations by aligning cues across modalities. This approach relies on the core assumption that the exemplar image-text pairs constitute two representations of an identical concept. However, recent research has revealed that real-world datasets often exhibit \emph{cross-modal misalignment}. There are two distinct viewpoints on how to address this issue: one suggests mitigating the misalignment, and the other leveraging it. We seek here to reconcile these seemingly opposing perspectives and to provide a practical guide for practitioners. Using latent variable models, we thus formalize cross-modal misalignment by introducing two specific mechanisms: \emph{selection bias}, where some semantic variables are absent in the text, and \emph{perturbation bias}, where semantic variables are altered---both leading to misalignment in data pairs. Our theoretical analysis shows that, under suitable assumptions, population global minimizers of an alignment--entropy surrogate yield representations that depend only on the semantic variables unaffected by selection and perturbation biases and locally identify this subset almost surely. Extensive empirical studies on synthetic data and real image-text datasets further examine how cross-modal misalignment shapes semantic predictability and downstream performance, shedding light on its nuanced impact on multimodal representation learning.

cs.LG↗