Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.24254

Dimension Thresholds for Relative-Error Representations of Finite Metrics in Pseudo-Euclidean Spaces

Abstract

A finite metric space with $N$ points admits an exact representation in a pseudo-Euclidean space of dimension at most $N-1$. We study the minimum dimension required for relative-error approximation of squared distances. Our main result gives an upper bound for arbitrary metrics in terms of local distance ratios: for $4/5<\varepsilon<1$, dimension $O((N/k)\log N+kρ_k^4\log N/(\varepsilon-4/5)^2)$ suffices, where $ρ_k$ is the largest ratio, over all points, between the distance to the $k$th closest point (counting the point itself) and the nearest-neighbour distance. The proof combines a low-rank landmark approximation with a sparse correction controlled by its factorization norm. For metrics with distances in $[1,Φ]$, where $Φ\ge5$ is fixed, the worst-case dimension is $Θ(N)$ for $0<\varepsilon<4/5$, lies between $Ω(\sqrt N)$ and $O(\sqrt N\log N)$ for $4/5<\varepsilon<12/13$, and is $Θ(\log N)$ for $\varepsilon>(Φ^2-1)/(Φ^2+1)$. For $Φ>5$, an intermediate range remains without matching bounds. Sign-pattern counting yields the $Ω(\sqrt N)$ lower bound for $4/5<\varepsilon<12/13$, while Hadamard matrices give explicit linear lower bounds for $\varepsilon<4/5$ via a known approximate-rank estimate. We also construct configurations with null squared intervals whose minimum representation dimension remains $N-1$ for every $\varepsilon<1$. Finally, for every fixed $0<\varepsilon<3/5$, we show that the quadratic dependence on the parameter $C$ in the dimension bound derived from Deng et al.'s pseudo-Euclidean Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma is necessary up to a logarithmic factor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nikita Muravya, Aleksandr Bespalov, Anna Vozianova. 2026-10-16. Dimension Thresholds for Relative-Error Representations of Finite Metrics in Pseudo-Euclidean Spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24254

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotics of Constrained Quantization for Compactly Supported Measures

We study constrained quantization of a compactly supported probability $P$ on $\mathbb{R}^D$ by codebooks in a nonempty closed set $S$. For $0 0$ on a fixed source set $F$ bounds $Δ_{n,r}$ below by the classical $β$-power quantization cost of $ν_F=T_*(wP|_F)$. If $dν_F=\widehat w\,dη$ for a compactly supported reference probability $η$ and $\widehat w\in A_p(η)$, $1<p<\infty$, then $Δ_{n,r}\geν_F(\mathbb{R}^D)[\widehat w]_{A_p(η)}^{-1}q_{n,β/p}(η)^β$. These comparisons yield bounds for the quantization dimensions defined by $e_{n,r}-L_r$ and $Δ_{n,r}^{1/r}$, with distinct behavior at positive and zero baselines. Convex and uniformly prox-regular constraints supply the growth weights through their projection inequalities. Circle and lifted Cantor distributions give matching quadratic-excess rates, while rectifiable weighted projections give lower Zador estimates.

math.MG↗

Notes on uniform contractions of congruent balls

In this note, we obtain stronger results on uniform contractions of intersections and unions of congruent balls, thereby extending previous partial confirmations of the Kneser-Poulsen conjecture in these settings. In addition, we establish Blaschke-Santaló-type inequalities for r-ball bodies.

math.MG↗

Exponential improvements in Rado's covering problem

Let $B^d$ denote the $d$-dimensional Euclidean ball of unit radius. What is the largest constant $f(B^d) \in [0,1]$ with the property that every finite collection $\mathcal{C}$ of unit balls in $\mathbb{R}^d$ admits a disjoint sub-collection $\mathcal{S}$ occupying at least a fraction $f(B^d)$ of the volume of $\mathcal{C}$? This problem was first raised by T. Radó in 1928, for axis-parallel squares in the plane; the author was motivated by a classical covering lemma in real analysis due to Vitali. The case of Euclidean balls was first considered by R. Rado in 1949. Until last year the best known estimates on $f(B^d)$ for unit balls where very far apart: \[ (1+ε_d) 3^{-d} \leq f(B^d) \leq 2^{-d}, \] where $0<ε_d=o_{d\rightarrow \infty}(1)$. Recently, the authors of this note observed that an exponential improvement on the upper bound follows from the Kabatiansky--Levenshtein spherical code bound, while the lower bound was improved by a linear factor by C.~Xie and G.~Ge (see arxiv:2608.09744). The current best estimates for large $d$ are \[ c \cdot d \cdot 3^{-d} \leq f(B^d) \leq 2.447^{-d}, \] where $c>0$ is an absolute constant. Here we offer the first exponential improvement of the lower bound in almost 80 years, which narrows the gap to: \[ 2.910^{-d} \leq f(B^d) \leq 2.447^{-d}. \] Our method is constructive and yields a polynomial time algorithm for finding a disjoint sub-collection realizing the estimate. Moreover the same technique gives similar exponentially improved lower bounds for all symmetric convex bodies satisfying a uniform convexity assumption, e.g., $\ell^p$-balls for all $p\in (1,\infty)$.

math.MG↗