Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.24282

ROAR: Benchmarking LMM Agents under Real-Time Constraints in Multiplayer Action-Shooter Games

Abstract

Large multimodal models (LMMs) are increasingly deployed as agents that perceive, reason, and act in interactive multi-agent environments. Yet most existing benchmarks for LMM-based agents in multi-agent settings remain turn-based: the environment and other agents pause while an agent performs inference. Such protocols obscure a fundamental challenge of real-time constraints, where the world continues to evolve and delayed decisions may become outdated before execution. Motivated by this limitation, we introduce ROAR, a multiplayer action-shooter game environment for evaluating LMM-based agents in multi-agent settings under real-time constraints. ROAR covers cooperative, competitive, mixed cooperative-competitive, and basic single-agent scenarios. We further propose a Multi-Agent Asynchronous Gym interface that decouples environment evolution from agent reasoning by running the environment and each agent in separate threads, enabling the environment to advance at fixed time intervals without waiting for LMM inference and allowing agents to reason independently without blocking one another. ROAR also features convenient deployment, multimodal observations, and customizable levels. ROAR offers a practical testbed for advancing LMM-based agents beyond static, turn-based evaluation toward real-time multi-agent decision-making.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dawei Wang, Di Zhao, Jianran Yu, Chengming Zhou, Marci Chi Ma, Xiaoyang Liu, Beining Zhang, Shuliang Chu, Yun Sing Koh, Gary Ushaw, Richard Davison. 2026-10-16. ROAR: Benchmarking LMM Agents under Real-Time Constraints in Multiplayer Action-Shooter Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24282

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

OpenAgenet / OAN White Paper: Open Infrastructure for Trusted Agent Interconnection

OpenAgenet, abbreviated as OAN, is an open infrastructure project for trusted Agent interconnection. It addresses a problem that becomes visible when Agents move from isolated applications into open, multi-operator networks: before an Agent can safely discover, select, and invoke another Agent, it needs a way to verify identity provenance, governance state, discovery authorization, freshness, and pre-connection trust evidence. OAN is designed as a protocol-neutral trust layer. It does not replace Agent interaction protocols, tool protocols, model orchestration frameworks, or application-level workflows. Instead, it provides routing-aware did:oan-based resource identity, local OAN Identity material for signing and authentication, governance-backed admission, Registrar-assisted onboarding, Root-verified package publication, authorization-aware Discovery, Root-issued infrastructure authorization VCs, controller-aware authorization, and profile-defined signed trusted invocation. The architectural center of OAN is the combination of federated governance, resource identity, trusted Discovery, and the Root Node's three hub responsibilities. Root acts as a trust authorization hub for accepted identity state and evidence, a data-distribution hub for Root-verified packages, and a semantic-governance hub for the tag tree shared by registration and Discovery. This white paper explains the motivation, architecture, roles, governance model, relationship with MCP, A2A, and ANP, deployment patterns, cooperation model, on-chain governance layer, prototype status, public pilot network, standardization surfaces, performance profile, and roadmap of OAN.

cs.MA↗

OpenAgenet / OAN Yellow Paper: Technical Architecture for Trust-Governed Resource Identity and Discovery

This yellow paper describes the technical architecture of OpenAgenet / OAN. OAN is a protocol-neutral trust layer for open Agent interconnection and discoverable AI resource products. It specifies the role architecture, did:oan identity objects, registration workflow, governance-backed Root lifecycle enforcement, Root-verified package model, authorization-aware Discovery, Root-issued infrastructure authorization VCs, signed trusted invocation, Root's trust, data-distribution, and semantic-governance hub responsibilities, verification requirements, state transitions, security properties, implementation boundaries, and deployment considerations. The design is intended to support heterogeneous Agent frameworks and interaction protocols, including MCP, A2A, ANP-like systems, domain-specific Agent protocols, Skills, MCP Servers, and Tool/API resources. OAN does not define the entire business conversation among Agents or the native protocol of every resource; it defines how resource identities become admissible, discoverable, verifiable, and safe to approach before protocol-specific interaction begins, and how defined profiles carry that identity into protected protocol interaction.

cs.MA↗

ECHO: Learning Epistemically Adaptive Language Agents with Turn-Level Credit

Effective multi-turn agents must decide what information to seek, how to use new evidence, and when they are certain enough to act. We introduce Epistemic Decision Processes (EDPs), a belief-state formulation of multi-turn information seeking in which actions produce external observations that update the agent's posterior over a latent task variable. EDPs make epistemic adaptivity explicit: good policies choose actions that are useful under the current belief, not merely those that correlate with eventual success. We then introduce ECHO (Epistemic Credit for History-Conditioned Optimization), a practical clipped policy-gradient objective that assigns turn-level credit using posterior-sensitive rewards. In the Clue Selector Game, a novel controlled evidence-seeking benchmark, and in CRAFT, a challenging multiagent coordination game, we show that ECHO substantially improves resolution, information gain, and efficiency over trajectory-level GRPO, and matches or exceeds frontier baselines on epistemic metrics such as grounding, recovery, and calibration.

cs.MA↗