Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.24433

Longitudinal fMRI reveals multi-network reconfiguration and a recurrent frontoparietal shift across rest and task states during adult aging

Tingshan Liu·Wanxin Dong·Hairong Zheng·Dong Liang·Zhanli Hu·Guanxun Cheng·Na Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Functional connectivity changes across adult aging, but most evidence is cross-sectional, and covariance-based connectivity depends on blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) fluctuation amplitude. Covariance decline can reflect changing fluctuation amplitude, and its interpretation may depend on whether normalization uses signal amplitude or includes estimated noise. It is also unclear which longitudinal changes recur across brain states. We analyzed 852 adults (baseline age 36-89 years) from the Aging Adult Brain Connectome with repeated functional MRI (fMRI) during rest, inhibitory control, associative memory, and visual-motor processing (2,220 sessions; median follow-up 5.5 years). Baseline age and elapsed follow-up were modeled separately. Ten cortical networks were tested jointly across states, and covariance was normalized either by released signal amplitude or by a candidate total amplitude reconstructed from released signal and noise amplitudes. Native common covariance declined by 7-11% per 5 years, while signal pair amplitude declined by 9% on average across states, significantly more than estimated noise pair amplitude. Under signal normalization, the relative balance among networks reconfigured over follow-up and differed across states, and the frontoparietal network shifted positively relative to the other nine networks in all four states, by 5-8% per 5 years. The estimated common trajectory was near zero under signal normalization but declined by 4-7% per 5 years under candidate total normalization. The network reconfiguration and the positive frontoparietal-relative direction persisted under both. Within-person coupling between the frontoparietal shift and fluid cognition was not detected. Adult aging thus combines normalization-dependent overall change with a state-dependent redistribution among networks that includes a recurrent frontoparietal shift.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tingshan Liu, Wanxin Dong, Hairong Zheng, Dong Liang, Zhanli Hu, Guanxun Cheng, Na Zhang. 2026-10-17. Longitudinal fMRI reveals multi-network reconfiguration and a recurrent frontoparietal shift across rest and task states during adult aging. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24433

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Population Neuroscience 3.0: Bridging large-N and small-N paradigms in brain-wide association studies

Brain-wide association studies (BWAS) leveraging large datasets, have led to divergent and sometimes opposing views on research practices and priorities. The debates span multiple dimensions, including large-N vs.\ small-N sampling, cross-sectional vs.\ longitudinal, observational vs.\ interventional/causal, population generalizability vs.\ individual specificity, data-driven vs.\ hypothesis-driven, prediction-oriented vs.\ explanation-oriented, and molecular/cellular vs.\ systems-level. Taken together, these tensions are not only about methodology, but also about how large-N population studies and small-N, mechanism-focused studies should relate to one another. Shifts along these axes have sharpened disagreements and added to fragmentation in an already heterogeneous field of cognitive neuroscience. Here, we sketch an integrative response grounded in population neuroscience, organized around a closed-loop ``design--analysis--interpretation'' research cycle that aims to build consensus while bridging these divides. Our central claim is that population neuroscience offers a distinctive population-level vantage point for identifying general patterns, characterizing inter-individual variabilities, and benchmarking intra-individual changes, thereby providing reference frameworks through which small-N, mechanism-focused studies can co-evolve with large-N population studies. Population neuroscience is not simply about providing larger N for BWAS; more fundamentally, it is about accumulating cross-scale priors and shared infrastructures for design, analysis, and interpretation across human neuroscience studies. In this sense, we outline a ``third-generation'' agenda for population neuroscience that shifts emphasis from amassing isolated associations to building reference frameworks for cumulative mechanistic and translational research.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Predictive and feedback signals differently shape the formation of language representations

Adults vary greatly in how effectively they learn a new language, but the signals driving the learning processes and individual differences remain unclear. Over seven days, we tracked behavioral learning and collected fMRI data on day 1 from 102 adults as they learned an artificial language with corrective feedback. We trained matched transformer models to predict upcoming linguistic elements, learn grammaticality from corrective supervision or reinforcement-like reward signals in the feedback, and compared their internal representations with human brain activity. Representations derived from the prediction-focused model accounted for the largest share of unique neural variance at the group level, despite the human task being feedback-based. Across model-training stages, alignment between the predictive model and neural representations shifted from sensory to higher-order language and associative networks, indicating a model abstraction process. Conversely, neural patterns related to the feedback model were most useful for predicting individuals' future generalization outcomes on Day 7. Reward signals did not significantly account for learning variance of either type. These findings support a multi-signal model of adult language learning, in which prediction shapes a common neural learning architecture across learners, whereas feedback-related mechanisms better explain individual differences over time.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Perceived vertical and eye level as one orientation process: a closed-form account of the Li-Matin combination rules for egocentric space

Li and Matin (2005a, 2005b) reported three regularities of the induced visually-perceived vertical (VPV), the direction judged upright. For small tilts, a peripheral line shifts it nearly linearly with tilt, two lines combine nearly linearly, and mirror-image tilts cancel. Each line votes at twice its angle, weighted by its strength. The votes' vector sum $c_1$ is the first circular moment of the doubled angles; half its angle, $ϕ=\tfrac12\arg c_1$, is the induced vertical, a stimulus axis, not the judged upright. This is the orientation order-parameter model (PLUMB). We prove that $c_1$ is, up to a constant factor, the only additive summary of axes (lines without arrowheads) that scales with line strength and turns twice as far as the field rotates. With Li and Matin's own length gain and no per-configuration fit, the model matches their multiline coefficients in-sample. Their data rule out complete summation but not simple averaging for long lines. But a line's effect is fourfold (period $90^\circ$): it reverses past $45^\circ$ (Li and Matin, 2005a; Vingerhoets et al., 2009), and near-horizontal lines shift VPV as near-vertical ones do, which $c_1$ forbids. In a two-harmonic fit to Li and Matin's data, $c_1$ carries an estimated 2--4% of a near-vertical line's slope and a fourfold term the rest. To first order in tilt, for near-vertical segments, the readout equals the committee rule Shavit, Li, and Matin (2026) fit to eight line-array experiments, with its drives read as concentrations. If the half-fields' signals are read as sum and difference, perceived eye level (VPEL) is the difference, recovering Shavit, Li, and Matin's (2013) reversed integration rules; a fourfold term gives the same signals, so this does not single out $c_1$. Re-analysed data (30 observers) show the predicted signs and nulls, an internal check only; the cross-field gain is fitted.

q-bio.NC↗