Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.25338

Subexponential Algorithms for Total Search Problems in the Dense Pigeonhole Regime

Abstract

The class $\mathsf{PPP}$ captures fundamental total search problems, for which a solution is guaranteed to exist by the pigeonhole principle and the main challenge is to find it. We ask whether problems in this class admit significantly faster algorithms in the \emph{dense regime}. More concretly, we study \emph{binary collision Short Integer Solution} (SIS): given a matrix $A\in\mathbb{Z}_q^{n\times m}$ with $m>n\log q$, the goal is to find distinct $\underline{\mathbf{x}},\underline{\mathbf{y}}\in\{0,1\}^m$ with $A\underline{\mathbf{x}}=A\underline{\mathbf{y}}\pmod q$. Brute-force enumeration can be used to find a collision in $q^{\mathcal{O}(n)} \operatorname{poly}(|I|)$ time, and no significantly faster algorithm for that problem is known. We present an algorithm running in time $q^{o(n)}\cdot\operatorname{poly}(|I|)$ whenever the density parameter $δ:= m/(n\log q)$ is $ω(1)$.\footnote{All logarithms are in base $2$, and $|I|$ is the binary input length.} Building on reductions of Sotiraki et al.~(FOCS~2018), we obtain corresponding algorithms for dense variants of weak constrained SIS, Equal Vector Sums, Minkowski, and Blichfeldt. Our algorithm adapts techniques of Bhati et al.~(FOCS~2026), who gave a subexponential algorithm for Equal Sums in the dense regime and proved a tight conditional lower bound. Their conditional lower bound easily transfers to SIS and shows that the running time of our algorithms is essentially optimal.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jadwiga Czyżewska, Karolina Drabik, Marek Sokołowski, Karol Węgrzycki. 2026-10-18. Subexponential Algorithms for Total Search Problems in the Dense Pigeonhole Regime. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25338

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Near-Optimal Consistency-Robustness Bounds for Non-Clairvoyant Scheduling

We study the problem of characterizing the optimal consistency--robustness tradeoff for single-machine non-clairvoyant scheduling with predicted processing times. For a fixed number of jobs $n$, Wei and Zhang (2020) established a lower bound on the achievable consistency--robustness tradeoff which is known to be tight only in a few restrictive cases, leaving the optimal tradeoff for general $n$ unresolved. A different worst-case-$n$ regime was introduced by Benomar et al. (2025), who applied the former work's construction to show that for $λ\in (0, 1)$, any $(1+λ)$-consistent algorithm must be $1 + Ω(\sqrt{1/λ})$-robust. On the other hand, the best known upper bound gives $(1+λ)$-consistency and $1+O(1/λ)$-robustness, leaving a polynomial gap. In this work, we develop a new lower bound using a multi-stage adversarial construction and a new algorithm that together give a near-optimal characterization of the consistency--robustness tradeoff: for every $n$, our upper bound is within a multiplicative factor $3/2$ of our lower bound, and thus our algorithm is within a multiplicative factor $3/2$ of the online optimal. In particular, our lower bound shows that any $(1+λ)$-consistent algorithm must have robustness at least $1/\sqrtλ$ as $n \to \infty$, while our algorithm achieves robustness at most $\frac{1}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{5}{4}+1/λ}$ for any $n$, matching the lower bound in the leading term as $λ\downarrow 0$; our upper bound also closes the polynomial gap in the worst-case-$n$ regime. We additionally show how our algorithm can be made error-tolerant, preserving the near-optimal consistency-robustness tradeoff while incurring only slightly degraded performance under bounded prediction errors.

cs.DS↗

Optimal Labeling Schemes for $Γ$-Free Matrices

We study labeling schemes for $p \times q$ $Γ$-free binary matrices, which do not contain a submatrix of the form $Γ= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$. We give a labeling scheme that uses $O(\log^2 N)$-bit labels for rows and columns, where $N=p+q$, such that any matrix entry can be determined from the corresponding two labels in constant time in the word RAM model. The worst-case label size matches the counting lower bound up to constant factors. We also show that the entrywise least $Γ$-free supermatrix of an arbitrary $p\times q$ binary matrix, together with its labels, can be constructed in $O(pq)$ time. Our construction represents a $Γ$-free matrix by a sequence of rooted forests, where each column corresponds to a node and the $1$-entries of each row form a root path in its corresponding forest. For $n$-vertex strongly chordal and chordal bipartite graphs, our result gives asymptotically optimal $O(\log^2 n)$-bit adjacency labeling schemes with constant-time queries. These results answer both representation questions posed by Spinrad in 1995.

cs.DS↗

On the Largest Cardinality Subset Sum

We study Largest Cardinality Subset Sum (LCSS): given $n$ nonnegative integers and a target $t$, compute a subset summing to $t$ with maximum cardinality. We also consider its all-targets version (ATLCSS), which asks for this maximum for every sum $s\in\{1,\ldots,t\}$. The LCSS problem sits squarely between the subset sum and the knapsack problem. A straightforward dynamic-programming algorithm runs in time $O(nt)$ and solves ATLCSS, and using Jin and Bringmann (both in STOC 2024, independent work) $0$-$1$ knapsack results we achieve a $\widetilde{O}(n + a_{\max}^2)$-time deterministic algorithm for LCSS. Our main result is a randomized $\widetilde{O}(n+\sqrt{n}\,t)$-time algorithm for LCSS. Then, we complement this result with a randomized $\widetilde{O}(n+t^{3/2})$-time algorithm for ATLCSS. Together, our two algorithms give a $\widetilde{O}(n+t\min\{\sqrt{n},\sqrt{t}\})$-time algorithm for LCSS. As an application of ATLCSS, we solve the search version of Projection Subset Sum, introduced by Dutta and Rajasree (SYNSAC 2023), in $\widetilde{O}(n+t^{3/2})$ time for every fixed $\ell_p$ norm with $p\geq 1$. For $\ell_1$, we obtain $\widetilde{O}(n+t)$ time, removing the unique-representation assumption required by their algorithm. Both algorithms output an optimal modified vector and a witnessing subset.

cs.DS↗