Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.25413

Weakly Supervised Adaptation of Scientific Embeddings for Exploratory Literature Mapping

Abstract

Scientific document embeddings such as SPECTER2 are optimized for retrieval over large, heterogeneous corpora. On a small specialized corpus their similarity distributions can become highly compressed, which limits their usefulness for exploratory literature mapping. We study whether weakly supervised in-domain adaptation, using only metadata already available in open citation databases, changes this geometry. On ArtCon, a curated corpus of 704 publications on artificial and machine consciousness, we adapt the SPECTER2 proximity model with a lightweight LoRA adapter trained on positive pairs derived from bibliographic coupling in OpenAlex, using no manually annotated similarity labels. We compare the adapted embeddings with lexical (TF-IDF), citation-based (bibliographic coupling) and generic semantic (SPECTER2) representations under thresholded, fixed-density and symmetric k-nearest-neighbour graph constructions. Adaptation substantially decompresses the similarity distribution (mean pairwise cosine similarity 0.9104 to 0.8663, standard deviation 0.0259 to 0.0594) and yields graphs with markedly higher Louvain modularity and better connectivity than the base encoder under matched edge and neighbourhood budgets. The effect is stable across all three graph constructions and is therefore not an artefact of a single sparsification choice. We report this as a case study on one corpus, and we are explicit about what it does not establish: the clustering indices used here are computed against community labels derived from each representation's own similarity graph, so they measure internal geometric self-consistency rather than agreement with an external topical ground truth, and adaptation and evaluation use the same documents. Evaluation against independent labels, on held-out documents, and against geometric controls is ongoing work.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Roman Neruda, Petra Vidnerová, Jiří Šejnoha, Jakub Mihálik, Tomáš Marvan. 2026-10-18. Weakly Supervised Adaptation of Scientific Embeddings for Exploratory Literature Mapping. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25413

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Metadata conflicts and their impact on DataCite metadata completeness in disciplinary research data repositories

This paper presents results from a study that investigates how eight disciplinary research data repositories from the geosciences and social sciences navigate metadata conflicts - conflicts in implementations of the same standard and inter-standard conflicts - and how these conflicts affect the completeness of DataCite metadata. It combines results from analyzing DataCite metadata records, structural differences between three disciplinary metadata schemas and the DataCite Metadata Schema, and a direct comparison of two metadata records describing the same dataset. The results show that both conflicts in implementations of the same standard and inter-standard conflicts contribute to incomplete DataCite metadata. In addition to inherent differences between the metadata schemas, workflows and conscious decisions by the repositories also contribute to these conflicts. Some of these conflicts could be resolved by updated metadata crosswalks, emerging initiatives for retroactive collaborative metadata enrichment, the implementation of metadata application profiles or schema updates. Other conflicts can't be resolved or are strongly connected to the repository mission. The results also highlight that metadata completeness is multifaceted, and assessment requires careful consideration of context.

cs.DL↗

From Code Archival to Knowledge Graph: Bridging Software Heritage, COAR Notify and Wikidata

Software is a first-class scientific object, yet validated links between source code and the scholarly record remain largely absent from the Linked Open Data (LOD) cloud, isolating archived artefacts from semantic discovery. This paper presents an end-to-end reconciliation pipeline that harvests, validates, and models publication-to-repository pairs from sources where the link between a paper and its source code is explicit and editorially verified: the software-centric journals JOSS, SoftwareX, and IPOL, together with the reproducibility reports of the SIGMOD Availability and Reproducibility Initiative (ARI). This yields a curated corpus of 4,397 $\langle$DOI, repository-URL$\rangle$ pairs. We design two distinct application profiles grounded in Wikidata classes (one for scholarly articles, one for software instances) aligned with the schema.org and CodeMeta vocabularies. This architectural separation enables rule-based reconciliation at two granularities: lightweight, inline publication references or standalone, first-class Wikidata software nodes equipped with SWHIDs, Software Heritage's content-addressed identifiers. A read-only lookup against Wikidata shows that only 82 of the harvested repositories were already modelled there; human-reviewed batches have since created 4{,}182 new software items cross-linked to their articles. We further show that payloads of the emerging COAR Notify protocol, an external effort we do not develop, map natively onto our input format, so the same backend could later serve a live enrichment stream. Our core contribution is a pair of application profiles that turn Wikidata into a connector between the scholarly record and archived source code; we openly release all code, application profiles, and harvested datasets.

cs.DL↗

MATCH: Multi-stage Article Tagging to Concept Hierarchies

The increasing specialization of scientific research calls for fine-grained representations of publication content that can be applied at scale. SCALE extends the OpenAlex taxonomy with approximately 114,000 Scientific Concepts derived from author keywords, but assigning these Concepts to individual publications remains challenging. We introduce MATCH (Multi-stage Article Tagging to Concept Hierarchies), a framework that assigns SCALE Concepts using article titles, abstracts, and author keywords. MATCH combines multi-view embedding retrieval, deterministic taxonomy-aware filtering, and language-model reranking to select relevant Concepts while preserving their hierarchical paths. Its modular design supports both API-based and self-hosted inference. In a blind evaluation involving 22 domain experts across 11 fields and 110 articles, the self-hosted and API-based configurations achieved Precision of 81.5% and 83.3%, respectively, and Precision@5 of approximately 89% for both, with no statistically significant difference detected. These findings support the practical viability of the evaluated self-hosted configuration for large-scale Concept assignment without per-token API charges. Deployed on over two million MDPI publications, MATCH assigns a median of five Concepts per article, covers approximately 94% of the SCALE Concepts, and supports daily indexing of newly available publications. By operationalizing the SCALE taxonomy at publication level, MATCH provides a foundation for fine-grained scientometric analysis and monitoring of scientific developments.

cs.DL↗