Informative Imitation

Nemanja Antic; Harry Pei

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.25539

Informative Imitation

Nemanja Antic·Harry Pei

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study steady-state equilibria of a sequential learning game in which each agent chooses between a safe action and a risky action of unknown profitability. Before choosing, each agent observes how many of the last $m$ agents adopted the risky action, but not whether they were informed or what their adoption costs were. We show that uninformed agents' imitation decisions can be strategic complements: the more likely uninformed agents are to join risky-action herds, the more informative those herds become about the action's profitability. When this complementarity gives rise to multiple equilibria, the one that maximizes the probability of imitation by uninformed agents also maximizes agents' welfare.

Explore related subjects

econ.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Nemanja Antic, Harry Pei. 2026-10-18. Informative Imitation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25539

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Collective decisions under uncertainty: efficiency, ex-ante fairness, and normalization

This paper studies preference aggregation under uncertainty in the multi-profile framework and characterizes a new class of aggregation rules that can address classical concerns about Harsanyi's (1995) utilitarian rules. Our aggregation rules, which we call \textit{relative fair aggregation rules}, are grounded in three key ideas: utilitarianism, egalitarianism, and the 0--1 normalization of individual utilities. These rules are parameterized by a set of weight vectors over individuals and evaluate each ambiguous alternative by taking the minimum weighted sum of 0--1 normalized utility levels over the weight set. For the characterization, we propose two novel axioms, \textit{weak preference for mixing} and \textit{restricted certainty independence}, with normative justifications. Additional results clarify how these axioms capture the utilitarian and egalitarian attitudes of the rules.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

Theoretical Foundations of Sequential Dynamic Programming

Many economic problems have several controls per period, whose joint choice is subject to the curse of dimensionality. Solving them in stages is computationally cheaper, but no general result says when staging is exact. I develop a separability theory, discrete choices and non-concave objectives included: staging is exact if utility, transitions, and constraints depend on earlier decisions only through a state passed forward. For each ordering the smallest such state exists and is unique up to relabeling. Any state that keeps staging exact for all preferences over later decisions and the future must carry everything the smallest one carries for the transition. For affine primitives, the smallest state consists of the linear combinations, such as cash-on-hand, on which later outcomes depend. Its dimensions pick the order whose largest stage is smallest. In a six-choice household model, each stage chooses one variable on a three-dimensional state, the joint problem all six.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

Random Disclosure Costs: A Unified Theory of Disclosure

We propose a unified framework for a class of evidence games in which a sender, seeking to increase posterior expectations (e.g., a market price), chooses whether to reveal or withhold her information. Our model nests several classic models, including type-dependent disclosure costs or benefits, uncertain information endowment, and the market for lemons. Frictions are captured as random disclosure costs that are privately known to the sender and noisily inferred by the receiver. We derive a simple characterization of the equilibrium and show that it features increasing disclosure for lower frictions or greater fundamental uncertainty. Further, with high uncertainty or low frictions, greater uncertainty about disclosure costs decreases the likelihood of disclosure. Positive costs do not necessarily rule out unraveling to full disclosure, especially when outcomes have heavy tails or when disclosure costs are not constant. Finally, we demonstrate that the model can be estimated with a simple probit, suggesting that cost uncertainty is descriptive of real-world behavior.

econ.TH↗