Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.26529

On Exact Dihedral Angle Sum Ranges for Orthocentric and Isogonic Tetrahedra

Sergey Korotov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

For a nondegenerate Euclidean tetrahedron T, let Σ(T) denote the sum of its six interior dihedral angles. We establish the exact range [6 arccos(1/3), 3π) for the orthocentric and isogonic classes. The orthocentric part gives a short alternative proof of the sharp lower bound; the main new result is the corresponding isogonic theorem. Starting from classical insphere-contact geometry, we derive a reciprocal half-angle identity and a sharp defect inequality controlled by the scale-invariant dispersion of the reciprocal tangent-length parameters. This quantitative refinement shows that any nonzero dispersion forces a positive dihedral-angle-sum gap, and that near equality forces the normalized reciprocal parameters to be close to equality. Finally, the common kite subfamily realizes every value in the interval and proves sharpness of both endpoints.

Explore related subjects

math.NAcs.NA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sergey Korotov. 2026-10-19. On Exact Dihedral Angle Sum Ranges for Orthocentric and Isogonic Tetrahedra. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26529

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Shape calculus and automatic differentiation for multi-phase level-set topology optimisation with unfitted finite elements

We present shape calculus techniques and a scalable automatic shape differentiation framework for multi-phase topology optimisation on unfitted discretisations defined by several level-set functions. First we establish general, exact shape calculus expressions in the discrete case for multi-phase systems by leveraging concepts from convex geometry. To complement this theoretical foundation, we introduce an open-source multi-phase automatic shape differentiation framework based on polytopal cutting. This computational framework is validated against both finite differences and our established exact expressions, matching the latter to near machine precision. Furthermore, the proposed automatic shape differentiation is scalable across distributed computing environments, demonstrating near ideal weak scaling up to 1.65 billion finite elements across 13,824 computer cores. We demonstrate our implementation by solving unfitted multi-phase topology optimisation problems for anisotropic diffusion, linear elasticity, and fluid--structure interaction. Together, these theoretical and computational contributions provide a robust and accessible foundation for advancing multi-phase topology optimisation using unfitted finite element methods. In particular, the methods enable the solution of topology optimisation problems involving multi-phase and multi-physics systems with non-trivial boundary conditions. The open-source software is available at https://github.com/zjwegert/GridapTopOpt.jl.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Soliton Profiles in 1D: Enhanced Neural-Network Solvers and Constrained Deep Ritz Methods

We develop and compare enhanced neural-network solvers for one-dimensional ground-state profiles, which are solutions of $$ Q^{\prime\prime}=bQ-γQ^{p},\quad Q>0,\quad p>1, \quad b, γ>0, $$ the stationary profile equation for the nonlinear Schrödinger, generalized Korteweg-de Vries, and nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations. Its explicit sech-type solutions serve as exact reference for error computation and benchmark hyperparameter selection. We improve on the standard Adam-trained physics-informed neural network (PINN) baseline by introducing higher-order optimization via Gauss-Newton/Levenberg-Marquardt and L-BFGS refinements, as well as Fourier-feature PINNs, and constrained Deep Ritz (DR) formulations. In DR approaches we introduce two new neural-network formulations, which implement two classical variational characterizations: a Nehari-constrained Deep Ritz method, in which the height is learned by projecting onto the Nehari/Pokhozhaev manifold, and a Weinstein Deep Ritz method, in which a normalized profile minimizes the Weinstein quotient. The Deep Ritz formulations perform best overall, in particular, the Weinstein variant gives the best error-runtime balance. The neural-network based solvers remain less accurate and efficient than classical Petviashvili iteration in 1D, however, the current study provides a proof of concept: the mesh-free formulation, non-reliance on exact profiles or the related features make them promising in higher dimensions and for more complicated nonlinearities and dispersive operators.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Trace Inverse Estimates and Kernel-based Nitsche Galerkin Methods for Elliptic Interface Problems

We establish trace inverse estimates for products of independently generated Sobolev-kernel trial spaces on Lipschitz subdomains and use them to analyze symmetric Nitsche Galerkin methods for elliptic interface problems. The estimates control one-sided gradient traces by subdomain gradients, the interface jump, and an exterior boundary trace. Their conormal form provides the flux control required by the Nitsche formulation without imposing value constraints on the trial spaces, including configurations with an interior inclusion. For quasi-uniform center families with comparable fill distances and a fixed kernel scale, we obtain coercivity and well-posedness for sufficiently large penalty parameters independent of refinement. We prove energy and $L^2$ error bounds of orders $h^{s-1}$ and $h^s$ for piecewise $H^s$ solutions, $2\le s\le m$, where $h$ is the maximum fill distance and $m$ is the kernel Sobolev order. The $L^2$ bound additionally requires piecewise $H^2$ regularity of the homogeneous adjoint interface problem. For scaled kernels $Φ_{m,\varepsilon}$ with $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we also derive a scale-explicit condition-number bound in the kernel-translate basis. The analysis assumes exact geometry and integration. Planar experiments examine convergence and support scaling, whereas a three-dimensional mixed-boundary calculation illustrates the method.

math.NA↗