The ALMA REBELS Survey: The [C II] Luminosity Function of UV-Selected Galaxies at $z\sim7$

Thomas Herard-Demanche; Pascal A. Oesch; Rychard Bouwens; Jacqueline A. Hodge; Hiddo S. B. Algera; Manuel Aravena; Karin Cescon; Elisabete da Cunha; Pratika Dayal; Andrea Ferrara; Rebecca Fisher; Yoshinobu Fudamoto; Kasper E. Heintz; Hanae Inami; Andrea Pallottini; Lucie E. Rowland; Renske Smit; Laura Sommovigo; Mauro Stefanon; Michael W. Topping; Paul van der Werf; Ivana F. van Leeuwen

arXiv · 2610.27052

The ALMA REBELS Survey: The [C II] Luminosity Function of UV-Selected Galaxies at $z\sim7$

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Luminosity functions (LF) are some of the most basic quantities providing insights into galaxy evolution across cosmic time and enabling a direct comparison between observations and simulations. Here, we present the first [CII]158$μ$m LF at $z\sim7$ from a sizeable UV-selected ALMA sample. Our analysis makes use of 27 galaxies with significant [CII] emission line detections in the epoch of reionization from the REBELS (Reionization Era Bright Emission Line Survey) ALMA Large Program and its pilot programs. We used these line detections and similar from ALPINE to calibrate UV luminosity-$L_{\mathrm{[CII]}}$ and stellar mass-$L_{\mathrm{[CII]}}$ relations at $z\sim7$. Given the challenge in precisely defining a selection volume for the REBELS sample itself, we rely on published UV LF and stellar mass function (SMF) determinations at $z\sim7$ and three complementary approaches to derive the [CII] LF. The UV LF-based method provides a lower limit on the [CII] LF, due to its missing the most dust-obscured systems. Our SMF-based estimate yields a Schechter function with a characteristic luminosity of $L^*_{\mathrm{[CII]}}=10^{9.11^{+0.11}_{-0.27}} L_\odot$ and a steep faint-end slope. From $z\sim7$ to $z\sim5$, our inferred [CII] LF shows an evolution of +0.3 dex in normalisation and +0.1 dex in $L^*_{\mathrm{[CII]}}$. Our results indicate a general underprediction from models of the abundance of [CII] emitters at high-redshift and thus potentially the number densities of massive yet UV-faint systems implied by our SMF-based method. Additionally, they suggest that 63% of the star formation rate density occurs in massive [CII]-bright systems and that $\sim$60-90% of [CII] emitters at $z\sim7$ may be missed by bright UV selections. This highlights the importance of surveys focusing on especially massive, UV-faint sources at $z>6$.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.GA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Thomas Herard-Demanche, Pascal A. Oesch, Rychard Bouwens, Jacqueline A. Hodge, Hiddo S. B. Algera, Manuel Aravena, Karin Cescon, Elisabete da Cunha, Pratika Dayal, Andrea Ferrara, Rebecca Fisher, Yoshinobu Fudamoto, Kasper E. Heintz, Hanae Inami, Andrea Pallottini, Lucie E. Rowland, Renske Smit, Laura Sommovigo, Mauro Stefanon, Michael W. Topping, Paul van der Werf, Ivana F. van Leeuwen. 2026-10-19. The ALMA REBELS Survey: The [C II] Luminosity Function of UV-Selected Galaxies at $z\sim7$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27052

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Environmental dependence of galaxy properties in the southern GAMA regions

Using data from the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey, we investigate how galaxy properties correlate with the local environment, focusing on the two southern regions of the survey (G02 and G23) that have not previously been examined in this context. We employ two-point and marked correlation functions to quantify the environmental dependence of galaxy color, stellar mass, luminosity across the $u$, $g$, $r$, $J$, and $K$ bands, as well as star formation rate (SFR) and specific star formation rate (sSFR). We also assess the impact of redshift incompleteness and cosmic variance on these clustering measurements. Our results show that $u-r$ and $g-r$ colors are most strongly correlated with local overdensity, followed by stellar mass. The sSFR exhibits a clear inverse relationship with density of the environment, consistent with the trend observed for $u$-band luminosity, which traces young stellar populations. In contrast, galaxies brighter in the $g$, $J$, and $K$ bands preferentially inhabit denser regions. By comparing our measurements from the southern regions with those from the equatorial regions of GAMA, we find that cosmic variance does not significantly influence our conclusions. However, redshift incompleteness affects the clustering measurements, as revealed through comparisons of subsets within the G02 region. The measured correlations provide key constraints for models of galaxy assembly across mass and environment, while the environmental trends in color and near-infrared luminosity offer a means to trace stellar mass growth and quenching with redshift.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2026

Dark matter density profiles of the Milky Way satellite population: reconciling simulations and observations

The cusp-core problem remains a key challenge for the $Λ$CDM model. Historically, comparing inner dark matter halo slopes ($d\logρ/d\log r$) from simulations and observations has suffered from a methodological mismatch: evaluating slopes at different radii creates apparent tensions due to inconsistent definitions rather than genuine physical differences. We rigorously compare dark matter density profiles of Milky Way (MW) dwarf satellites inferred from dynamical modelling against CDM hydrodynamical simulations. Using the NIHAO and FIRE-2 suites ($M_{\star} \sim 10^3$-$10^{11}\,\rm M_\odot$), we confront simulated profiles with dynamical inferences of 16 MW satellites across four methods, strictly within their reliability limits. Crucially, we evaluate simulated slopes at observationally accessible radii, directly comparing profiles at matched stellar mass. Both observed and simulated galaxies exhibit a mass-dependent core-formation trend: inner slopes rise from cuspy values ($\approx -1.5$) at $M_{\star} \sim 10^5\,\rm M_\odot$ to core-like values ($\approx 0$ to $-0.4$) at $M_{\star} \sim 10^8\,\rm M_\odot$. Efficient core formation begins at $M_{\star} \gtrsim 10^6\,\rm M_\odot$ for centrals, where satellites display increased scatter consistent with tidal disruption. Simulated profiles agree with observations within $\lesssim 1σ$ for most systems, outperforming a NFW profile. Furthermore, differing observational models present scatter for a given system comparable to the simulation-to-observation offset. Evaluating dark matter density slopes at fixed physical radii significantly improves agreement between hydrodynamical simulations and dynamical models, revealing no clear tension when comparing profiles at fixed stellar mass, but Willman\,1 remains an unresolved outlier.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2026

Tighter Dark Matter Constraints from the Projected Mass Method: A Neural Network Enhanced Method for Galaxy Groups and Clusters

Measuring the total mass of the Milky Way and nearby galaxy groups is difficult because classical dynamical estimators rely on assumptions about satellite orbital geometry that are rarely satisfied in practice, and because only a handful of satellite galaxies are typically available as kinematic tracers. We present a new framework that corrects the well-known Projected Mass Estimator (PME) using a residual neural network trained on thousands of simulated galaxy groups from the IllustrisTNG cosmological simulation. Separate networks are trained for each satellite sample size, from as few as 5 satellites up to 50, so that the correction automatically accounts for the statistical noise that dominates when only a small number of tracers is available. In tests on simulated halos, the classical PME systematically overestimates halo masses by factors of $M_{\rm proj}/M_{\rm true} = 1.30^{+0.72}_{-0.62}$ (using the 2D distance) and $1.46^{+0.97}_{-0.72}$ (using the 3D distance), with RMSE of 0.29 and 0.32 dex respectively. The neural-network correction reduces this to $M_{\rm proj}/M_{\rm true} = 1.02^{+0.30}_{-0.26}$ with an RMSE of 0.13 dex. Applied to the Milky Way, the method yields a total mass of $M_{\rm MW} = 1.144^{+0.399}_{-0.296}\times10^{12}\,M_\odot$, with estimates based on the brightest 5-10 satellites favoring a somewhat lower range of $(0.8-0.95)\times10^{12}\,M_\odot$. The modified PME gives a tighter constraint on the virial masses and the inferred dark matter content of galaxy groups and clusters.

astro-ph.GA↗