Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.27542

BEACON: Bridging Multimodal Semantics and Asynchronous Propagation for Cloud System Anomaly Detection

Zhe Li·Tengxue Zhang·Yang Shu·Tung Kieu·Lunting Fan·Yingying Zhang·Bin Yang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Modern large-scale cloud systems continuously generate massive and multimodal observability data, such as time-series metrics, log records, and system dependency graphs, which reflect the health state of the system. To ensure reliable cloud system operation, anomaly detection models identify abnormal states by analyzing these multimodal observations. However, existing approaches rely on simple fusion strategies and graph learning, ignoring the semantic gap among modalities and the asynchronous spatio-temporal dependencies across system instances over time. To this end, we propose BEACON, a framework to Bridge multimodal sEmantics and Asynchronous propagation for Cloud system anOmaly detectioN. Specifically, we introduce a Dynamic Interpretable Multimodal Aggregator (DIMA) that leverages an information-bottleneck mechanism to compress information from the semantics and temporal dynamics of metrics, and aligns them with logs in a shared prototype space. Furthermore, we propose an Asynchronous Spatio-Temporal Propagator (ASTP) that captures temporal dependencies with multi-scale temporal attention and models spatial relations with topology-aware aggregation. This enables asynchronous propagation of anomalies across system instances. Extensive experiments on three real-world cloud system datasets demonstrate that \textbf{BEACON} consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in anomaly detection.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhe Li, Tengxue Zhang, Yang Shu, Tung Kieu, Lunting Fan, Yingying Zhang, Bin Yang. 2026-10-20. BEACON: Bridging Multimodal Semantics and Asynchronous Propagation for Cloud System Anomaly Detection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27542

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Are EEG Sequences Time Series? EEG Classification with Time Series Models and Joint Subject Training

As with most other data domains, EEG data analysis relies on rich domain-specific preprocessing. Beyond such preprocessing, machine learners would hope to deal with such data as with any other time series data. For EEG classification many models have been developed with layer types and architectures we typically do not see in time series classification. Furthermore, typically separate models for each individual subject are learned, not one model for all of them. In this paper, we systematically study the differences between EEG classification models and generic time series classification models. We describe three different model setups to deal with EEG data from different subjects, subject-specific models (most EEG literature), subject-agnostic models and subject-conditional models. In experiments on three datasets, we demonstrate that off-the-shelf time series classification models trained per subject perform close to EEG classification models, but that do not quite reach the performance of domain-specific modeling. Additionally, we combine time-series models with subject embeddings to train one joint subject-conditional classifier on all subjects. The resulting models are competitive with dedicated EEG models in 2 out of 3 datasets, even outperforming all EEG methods on one of them.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

The Fenchel-Young Generalization of Bayesian Principles

Conjugate Bayes plays a key role in machine learning, ensuring computationally simple posterior updates. We generalize the variational principle behind this computation by using the Fenchel-Young (FY) inequality, which lets us define a generalized evidence lower bound beyond the KL geometry, and at equality, characterizes new generalized posteriors. A generalized notion of conjugacy follows, defined as closure of prior-potential families that are affine under translation by the loss. We show that such families not only preserve additive canonical updating, but also posterior inference with parameter-dependent supports and tuneably heavy tails. This combination is not feasible with standard conjugate Bayes. We derive a new FY generalization of expectation maximization (EM), which recovers classical and Hard EM, and amortized versions. We show examples, including generalized Bayesian linear regression with closed-form bounded support and heavy-tailed posteriors, and a Gaussian mixture with sparse cluster assignments.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Fragility-aware Classification for Risk Characterization and Robust Learning

Classification models play a central role in data-driven decision-making applications such as medical diagnosis, recommendation systems, and risk assessment. Traditional performance metrics, such as accuracy and AUC, quantify classification errors and pairwise ranking performance but do not account for the magnitude of errors, i.e., the risk of confident misjudgments. This limitation is particularly consequential in safety-critical and cost-sensitive settings, where overconfident errors can lead to severe outcomes. To address this issue, we propose the Fragility Index (FI), a novel performance metric that evaluates classifiers from a risk-averse perspective by capturing the tail risk of confident misjudgments. We formulate FI within a robust satisficing (RS) framework to quantify classifier sensitivity under distributional uncertainty. Building on this, we develop a tractable surrogate-based training framework and establish provable bounds connecting training fragility to ranking-error FI. We further derive tractable reformulations for a broad class of loss functions, including cross-entropy, hinge-type, and Lipschitz losses, and identify specific conditions under which these reformulations are exact. We also introduce an FI-induced regularizer for deep neural networks. Empirical results on real-world medical diagnosis tasks demonstrate that FI complements existing metrics by revealing error tail risk not reflected in accuracy or AUC. FI-based models achieve competitive predictive performance while generally attaining lower FI. In the simulated human--AI diagnostic workflow, they also achieve lower average operational costs than empirical risk minimization.

cs.LG↗