Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.27576

Who Gains When the Umpire Is a Machine? Evidence from the Automated Ball-Strike System (ABS)

Seung Jin Cho·Jun Yeong Lee
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 2024 the Korea Baseball Organization became the first top-tier league to replace the home-plate umpires ball-strike judgment with an automated system. Using over a million pitches from 2021 to 2026, we separate the change into the removal of human discretion and the imposition of a new zone geometry. The machine eliminated count-dependent calls, the value of catcher framing and a small advantage for star batters, rents worth only a few runs per player-season. Because the machines zone scales with height and treats every matchup alike, it redistributed strikes toward tall batters and across matchups, but few pitches are exposed to these changes, and their effects on plate-appearance outcomes are precisely estimated and close to zero. Pitchers re-optimized quickly by throwing higher, with left-handers catching up to an existing trend, whereas we find no evidence that batters adjusted. The results suggest that the incidence of replacing human judgment with a rule depends on its geometry and on exposure.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Seung Jin Cho, Jun Yeong Lee. 2026-10-20. Who Gains When the Umpire Is a Machine? Evidence from the Automated Ball-Strike System (ABS). https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27576

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The friendship paradox: Causal evidence of its behavioral consequences

We provide a first causal analysis of the behavioral consequences of the friendship paradox-the fact that people's friends in a network have more connections than average. We find that people's behavior is biased by their network position: they do not best respond to what they should infer the average behavior of the population to be (which determines their payoff), but instead best respond to the average behavior of their friends. In these games of complements, the friendship paradox generates a systematic upward distortion in actions and increases behavioral dispersion. These behavioral distortions persist despite learning opportunities: subjects fail to overcome the bias even when relocated within the network which should help them to understand how average population behavior can differ from local friend behavior.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Time is Knowledge: Response Times in Binary Response Models

Response times contain information about economically relevant but unobserved variables like willingness to pay, preference intensity, quality, or happiness. We provide a general characterization of the properties of latent variables that can be detected using response time data. Our theoretical framework unifies and generalizes existing results in the literature and gives rise to many new applications. We illustrate the novel insights that the method can deliver through three empirical applications: identifying an optimal nudge, testing decreasing marginal happiness of income, and predicting treatment heterogeneity.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

The economics of global personality diversity

Understanding why national economic performance differs remains a central question in economics. Although institutions and demographic diversity are established correlates of economic development, the contribution of within-population personality diversity has received limited attention. We introduce the Global Personality Diversity Index ($Ψ$-GPDI), a measure of psychological heterogeneity derived from assessments of 760,242 individuals across 135 countries using 30 facets of the Big Five personality traits. We show that most variation in these facets occurs within rather than between countries. Across countries with available economic data, personality diversity is positively associated with GDP per person employed, accounting for 19.9% of the variance in an adjusted single-predictor model. Including $Ψ$-GPDI alongside institutional quality and immigrant diversity increases the model's explanatory power by approximately 5.7%. Personality diversity is also weakly correlated with immigrant diversity, suggesting that the two measures capture distinct characteristics of national populations. These findings identify psychological heterogeneity as a potentially important and previously underexamined dimension of national human capital. Although the observational design does not establish causality, the results motivate further investigation of how personality diversity interacts with institutions, occupational specialization, and economic development.

econ.GN↗