Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.28010

RANGER: Retrieval Agent for Navigating Graphs with Semantic Evaluation Rewards

Abstract

The integration of Large Language Models and Reinforcement Learning offers a promising direction for complex sequential decision-making tasks, such as multi-hop question answering over knowledge graphs. While LLMs provide strong semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities, they often struggle with precise, multi-step navigation in structured environments. Conversely, RL agents excel at learning navigation policies but are hindered by the difficulty of designing semantically meaningful reward functions. This paper introduces a novel hybrid approach in which an LLM serves as a mentor to an RL agent during training by providing dense, semantically informed reward signals. The RL agent, built on a Transformer-based policy and trained with Group Relative Policy Optimization, learns to navigate a knowledge graph to retrieve relevant information. The LLM evaluates the semantic relevance of the agent's traversed paths, generating reward signals that align the agent's behavior with the information needs expressed in a query. We integrate this Retrieval Agent for Navigating Graphs with Semantic Evaluation Rewards (RANGER) into a complete question-answering pipeline and evaluate it on the open question answering datasets. Experimental results show that the proposed approach outperforms both a baseline retrieval-augmented system with classical graph search and one using an RL agent trained with heuristic rewards, achieving a significant increase in NLP metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge scores. Our findings demonstrate that deep integration of LLMs into the RL training loop yields more effective and semantically aligned retrieval policies for complex reasoning tasks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Artem Mikhaylov, Pavel Konoplev, Nikolay Efanov, Artyom Sorokin, Evgeny Burnaev. 2026-10-20. RANGER: Retrieval Agent for Navigating Graphs with Semantic Evaluation Rewards. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Limits of Post-Selection Generalization

While statistics and machine learning offer numerous methods for ensuring generalization, these methods often fail in the presence of adaptivity---the common practice in which the choice of analysis depends on previous interactions with the same dataset. A recent line of work has introduced powerful, general purpose algorithms that ensure post hoc generalization (also called robust or post-selection generalization), which says that, given the output of the algorithm, it is hard to find any statistic for which the data differs significantly from the population it came from. In this work we show several limitations on the power of algorithms satisfying post hoc generalization. First, we show a tight lower bound on the error of any algorithm that satisfies post hoc generalization and answers adaptively chosen statistical queries, showing a strong barrier to progress in post selection data analysis. Second, we show that post hoc generalization is not closed under composition, despite many examples of such algorithms exhibiting strong composition properties.

cs.LG↗

Quantifying Symptom Causality in Clinical Decision Making: An Exploration Using CausaLM

Current machine learning approaches to medical diagnosis often rely on correlational patterns between symptoms and diseases, risking misdiagnoses when symptoms are ambiguous or common across multiple conditions. In this work, we move beyond correlation to investigate the causal influence of key symptoms-specifically "chest pain" on diagnostic predictions. Leveraging the CausaLM framework, we generate counterfactual text representations in which target concepts are effectively "forgotten" enabling a principled estimation of the causal effect of that concept on a model's predicted disease distribution. By employing Textual Representation-based Average Treatment Effect (TReATE), we quantify how the presence or absence of a symptom shapes the model's diagnostic outcomes, and contrast these findings against correlation-based baselines such as CONEXP. Our results offer deeper insight into the decision-making behavior of clinical NLP models and have the potential to inform more trustworthy, interpretable, and causally-grounded decision support tools in medical practice.

cs.LG↗

Understanding and Mitigating Under-Confidence in GNNs from the Final Layer

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness on graph-based tasks. However, their predictive confidence is often miscalibrated, typically exhibiting under-confidence, which harms the reliability of their decisions. Existing calibration methods for GNNs normally introduce additional calibration components, which fail to capture the intrinsic relationship between the model and the prediction confidence, resulting in limited theoretical guarantees and increased computational overhead. To address this issue, we propose a simple yet efficient graph calibration method. We establish a unified theoretical framework revealing that model confidence is jointly governed by class-centroid-level and node-level calibration at the final layer. Based on this insight, we theoretically show that reducing the weight decay of the final-layer parameters alleviates GNN under-confidence by acting on the class-centroid level, while node-level calibration acts as a finer-grained complement to class-centroid-level calibration, which encourages each test node to be closer to its predicted class prototype in the final-layer representations. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of our method. The code is released at https://github.com/huangJC0429/SCAR.

cs.LG↗