Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.28015

Optimal Approximate Quantum Conversion from a Taut-String Principle in Majorization-Based Resource Theories

Abstract

Optimal approximate state conversion is a fundamental task in quantum resource theories, yet existing solutions are largely tailored to specific distinguishability measures and resource theories. We show that every optimal approximate-conversion problem in the three paradigmatic majorization-based quantum resource theories of non-uniformity, bipartite pure-state entanglement, and pure-state coherence reduces exactly to one of only four elementary taut-string constructions. This holds for problems generated by Schur-convex spectral distances and by a broad family of quantum divergences satisfying a natural reduction property with respect to the corresponding equivalence group. The resulting framework encompasses a broad class of physically relevant distinguishability measures, including the trace distance, all unitarily invariant norms, quantum relative entropy, maximal quantum $f$-divergences, and the $α$-$z$ Rényi relative entropies. The increment vector of the corresponding taut string completely determines both the optimal approximation error and a canonical optimal state. Our results establish a common geometric framework for approximate quantum resource conversion, revealing that a broad class of seemingly different optimization problems is governed by the same taut-string geometric principle.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Franco Meroi, Cesar Massri, Marcelo Losada, Guido Bellomo, Gustavo Martin Bosyk. 2026-10-20. Optimal Approximate Quantum Conversion from a Taut-String Principle in Majorization-Based Resource Theories. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Macroscopic quantum coherence and entanglement in mechanical systems

The notion of a macroscopic quantum state must be pinned down in order to assess how well experiments probe the large-scale limits of quantum mechanics. However, the issue of quantifying so-called quantum macroscopicity is fraught with multiple approaches having varying interpretations and levels of computability and measurability. Here, we introduce two measures that capture independent macroscopic properties: i) extensive size, measuring the degree of coherence in position or momentum observables relative to atomic-scale units, and ii) entangled size, quantifying the number of entangled subsystems. These measures unify many desirable features of past proposals while having rigorously justified interpretations from quantum information theory in terms of coherence and multipartite entanglement. We demonstrate how to estimate them and obtain lower-bounds using experimental data from micro-mechanical oscillators and diffracting molecules. Notably, we find evidence for genuine multipartite entanglement of $10^5$ to $10^7$ atoms in recent mechanical superposition states.

quant-ph↗

The Quantum Channels of the Compton Scattering of an Entangled Pair of Photons

The Compton scattering of an entangled pair of photons is studied. Using the resulting reduced density matrix, we demonstrate how to derive the Kraus operators for the interaction from the underlying fundamental theory, quantum electrodynamics. The normalization of the final density matrix of the entangled photons after the interaction is crucial to obtaining the correct probabilities and correlations. The reduced density matrix of the photon, which does not participate in the interaction directly, remains unchanged. It indicates that quantum effects in quantum sensing using an entangled photon pair can be observed only through the correlations or superposition of the entire pair. We relate our results to the Stokes parameters for determining polarizations and investigating the entangled states of photons from electron-positron annihilation in astrophysical systems.

quant-ph↗

Quantum-Inspired Optimization Process for Data Imputation

Data imputation is a critical preprocessing step, particularly in clinical datasets where missingness can bias downstream inference. We propose a quantum-inspired imputation framework and evaluate it on the UCI Pima Indians Diabetes dataset, where several physiological variables contain structural zeros that are treated as missing. The approach combines Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with quantum rotation-based reconstruction, where rotation angles are selected via gradient-free optimizers (Simulated Annealing, COBYLA, and Differential Evolution). For robustness, we retain the top three optimizer solutions per method and reconstruct missing values under distribution-aware bounds (e.g., $\pm 2$ standard deviations) and avoid unrealistic collapse toward central tendency. We also benchmark against (i) classical baselines (Mean, KNN, MICE, Decision Tree), (ii) modern matrix/ML imputers (SoftImpute, MissForest, VAE), and (iii) rotation/PCA controls (random orthogonal rotations and bootstrap PCA). Across the evaluated features, quantum-inspired variants achieve substantially improved distributional fidelity under Wasserstein W1 relative to modern baselines (e.g., the best quantum setting reduces average W1 by $\sim$66% vs. SoftImpute, $\sim$84% vs. MissForest, and $\sim$90% vs. VAE; and by $\sim$60% vs. Mean imputation), while remaining competitive with strong classical/control configurations. Dispersion is better preserved under the quantum-inspired methods, with variance/SD ratios closer to the observed data than (SoftImpute, MissForest, and VAE) and typically better than (Mean, KNN, MICE, and Decision Tree) on average. Overall, the results support quantum-inspired, optimization-guided rotations as a statistically grounded and scalable strategy for realistic imputation in healthcare and general AI pipelines, with a design that can be mapped to future quantum hardware as it matures.

quant-ph↗