Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.28178

Coincidence-Maximizing Customer Clustering Using Smart Meter Data

Ramiro H. Gálvez·Gabriel Martos Venturini·Iván Mondrzak
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Electricity distribution planning depends on peak-demand coincidence within customer groups, yet similarity-based clustering of smart-meter data does not optimize it directly. We formulate customer grouping to maximize the average of group coincidence factors, weighted by each group's daily share of summed individual peak demand. We prove that jointly optimizing memberships and group peak times is strongly NP-hard even for two groups. We therefore develop a fixed-peak refinement procedure applicable to any feasible partition. It alternates between identifying group peak times and exactly reassigning customers under minimum group-size constraints. Each polynomial-time reassignment maximizes a lower bound tight at the current partition, so accepted updates strictly improve weighted coincidence. We initialize refinement by clustering individual peak-time distributions and evaluate the method on four public smart-meter panels (27,654 customers) using chronological holdouts and 200 paired replicates with complete refitting. Refinement consistently improves weighted coincidence during fitting and reduces sensitivity to initialization. On held-out days, the method outperforms random grouping and five standalone benchmarks, with mean paired gains of 1.08-3.48 percentage points over the strongest benchmark. Requiring nearly equal group sizes lowers test weighted coincidence only modestly. The groups retain recognizable peak-time patterns over time, suggesting applications in peak-aware customer aggregation.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ramiro H. Gálvez, Gabriel Martos Venturini, Iván Mondrzak. 2026-10-20. Coincidence-Maximizing Customer Clustering Using Smart Meter Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28178

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Limits of Post-Selection Generalization

While statistics and machine learning offer numerous methods for ensuring generalization, these methods often fail in the presence of adaptivity---the common practice in which the choice of analysis depends on previous interactions with the same dataset. A recent line of work has introduced powerful, general purpose algorithms that ensure post hoc generalization (also called robust or post-selection generalization), which says that, given the output of the algorithm, it is hard to find any statistic for which the data differs significantly from the population it came from. In this work we show several limitations on the power of algorithms satisfying post hoc generalization. First, we show a tight lower bound on the error of any algorithm that satisfies post hoc generalization and answers adaptively chosen statistical queries, showing a strong barrier to progress in post selection data analysis. Second, we show that post hoc generalization is not closed under composition, despite many examples of such algorithms exhibiting strong composition properties.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Quantifying Symptom Causality in Clinical Decision Making: An Exploration Using CausaLM

Current machine learning approaches to medical diagnosis often rely on correlational patterns between symptoms and diseases, risking misdiagnoses when symptoms are ambiguous or common across multiple conditions. In this work, we move beyond correlation to investigate the causal influence of key symptoms-specifically "chest pain" on diagnostic predictions. Leveraging the CausaLM framework, we generate counterfactual text representations in which target concepts are effectively "forgotten" enabling a principled estimation of the causal effect of that concept on a model's predicted disease distribution. By employing Textual Representation-based Average Treatment Effect (TReATE), we quantify how the presence or absence of a symptom shapes the model's diagnostic outcomes, and contrast these findings against correlation-based baselines such as CONEXP. Our results offer deeper insight into the decision-making behavior of clinical NLP models and have the potential to inform more trustworthy, interpretable, and causally-grounded decision support tools in medical practice.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Understanding and Mitigating Under-Confidence in GNNs from the Final Layer

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness on graph-based tasks. However, their predictive confidence is often miscalibrated, typically exhibiting under-confidence, which harms the reliability of their decisions. Existing calibration methods for GNNs normally introduce additional calibration components, which fail to capture the intrinsic relationship between the model and the prediction confidence, resulting in limited theoretical guarantees and increased computational overhead. To address this issue, we propose a simple yet efficient graph calibration method. We establish a unified theoretical framework revealing that model confidence is jointly governed by class-centroid-level and node-level calibration at the final layer. Based on this insight, we theoretically show that reducing the weight decay of the final-layer parameters alleviates GNN under-confidence by acting on the class-centroid level, while node-level calibration acts as a finer-grained complement to class-centroid-level calibration, which encourages each test node to be closer to its predicted class prototype in the final-layer representations. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of our method. The code is released at https://github.com/huangJC0429/SCAR.

cs.LG↗