Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.28370

A General Construction of Strict Models in HoTT

Abstract

Homotopy type theory (HoTT) provides a natural setting for studying the metatheory of type theory, as it comes with additional extensionality principles compared to ordinary Martin-Löf type theory. In particular, it is especially suitable for developing semantics of type theory, where one distinguishes two kinds of models: strict models, which give us sound interpretations, and pseudomodels. Pseudomodels are useful as they occur prevalently and can be turned into strict models by constructions called strictifications. However, the commonly used strictifications do not translate well to HoTT, as they require assumptions that are generally not satisfied by concrete examples of models. We show how to carry out the universe model construction, due to Voevodsky, in HoTT. Under this construction, every pseudomodel together with a universe type closed under enough type formers gives rise to a strict model. We also show how to interpret type formers in the resulting model assuming that the universe is closed under them. Finally, we demonstrate that this construction generalises existing instances of strict set models in the literature, and we apply it to more examples, yielding presheaf models and assembly models of type theory in HoTT. Our results are formalised in Rocq using the UniMath library.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Niyousha Najmaei, Niels van der Weide. 2026-10-20. A General Construction of Strict Models in HoTT. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28370

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A declarative approach to specifying Paxos using three-valued modal fixpoint logic

We present Three-valued Fixpoint Quorum Logic, or 3muQL for short; a three-valued modal fixed-point logic designed for declaratively specifying and reasoning about distributed algorithms, such as the Paxos consensus algorithm. Our methodology represents a distributed algorithm as a logical theory, enabling correctness properties to be derived directly within the framework -- or revealing logical errors in the algorithm's design when they exist. 3muQL adopts a declarative approach, specifying the overall logic of computation without prescribing control flow. Notably, message-passing and state-transitions are not explicitly modelled, and notions of 'quorum' are abstracted from concrete thresholds to abstract modal operators. This distinguishes our framework from approaches like TLA+. The logical abstraction emphasises the essence of distributed algorithms, offering a novel perspective on their specification and reasoning. We define the syntax and semantics of 3muQL, explore its theoretical properties, and demonstrate its applicability through a detailed treatment of the Paxos consensus algorithm. By presenting Paxos as a logical theory and deriving its standard correctness properties, we showcase the framework's capacity to handle non-trivial distributed systems. We envision 3muQL as a versatile tool for specifying and reasoning about distributed algorithms. The Paxos example highlights the framework's ability to capture intricate details, offering a new lens through which distributed algorithms can be specified, studied, and checked. The ideas we present are easily implemented, and to demonstrate this we have implemented a freely-available proof-of- concept 3muQL model-checker, as an effective prototyping tool.

cs.LO↗

Ohana trees, linear approximation and multi-types for the $λ$I-calculus: No variable gets left behind or forgotten!

Although the $λ$I-calculus is a natural fragment of the $λ$-calculus, obtained by forbidding the erasure of arguments, its equational theories did not receive much attention. The reason is that all proper denotational models studied in the literature equate all non-normalizable $λ$I-terms, whence the associated theory is not very informative. The goal of this paper is to introduce a previously unknown theory of the $λ$I-calculus, induced by a notion of evaluation trees that we call "Ohana trees". The Ohana tree of a $λ$I-term is an annotated version of its Böhm tree, remembering all free variables that are hidden within its meaningless subtrees, or pushed into infinity along its infinite branches. We develop the associated theories of program approximation: the first approach -- more classic -- is based on finite trees and continuity, the second adapts Ehrhard and Regnier's Taylor expansion. We then prove a Commutation Theorem stating that the normal form of the Taylor expansion of a $λ$I-term coincides with the Taylor expansion of its Ohana tree. As a corollary, we obtain that the equality induced by Ohana trees is compatible with abstraction and application. Subsequently, we introduce a denotational model designed to capture the equality induced by Ohana trees. Although presented as a non-idempotent type system, our model is based on a suitably modified version of the relational semantics of the $λ$-calculus, which is known to yield proper models of the $λ$I-calculus when restricted to non-empty finite multisets. To track variables occurring in subterms that are hidden or pushed to infinity in the evaluation trees, we generalize the system in two ways: first, we reintroduce annotated versions of the empty multiset indexed by sets of variables; second, (...)

cs.LO↗

A simple formalization of alpha-equivalence

While teaching untyped $λ$-calculus to undergraduate students, we were wondering why $α$-equivalence is not directly inductively defined. In this paper, we demonstrate that this is indeed feasible. Specifically, we provide a grounded, inductive definition for $α$-equivalence and show that it conforms to the specification provided in the literature. The work presented in this paper is fully formalized in the Rocq Prover.

cs.LO↗