Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.28458

LocaLeJEPA: Maximum Entropy Representations under Geometric Priors

Abstract

Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPA) offer an appealing approach to self-supervised learning, but are typically prone to representation collapse. LeJEPA resolves this by introducing a theoretically grounded distribution-matching objective that drives the embedding towards an isotropic Gaussian. However, this approach is fundamentally tied to Euclidean assumptions, and its global target does not reflect domain-specific geometric priors, such as the use of non-Euclidean embedding geometries, e.g., equivariant CNNs or hyperbolic ViTs. We thus introduce LocaLeJEPA, a framework motivated by a manifold-theoretic reformulation of LeJEPA's entropy-maximization property. The accompanying LocaLeReg, a novel locally Euclidean distribution-matching regularizer, enables a stable and scalable implementation of the LocaLeJEPA framework. We then perform extensive experiments in the vision setting on models trained on ImageNet-1K. LocaLeJEPA significantly outperforms LeJEPA when paired with hyperbolic ViT-S/8 and equivariant ResNet-50 backbones, and also with ordinary Euclidean ViT-S/8 and ViT-L/14 backbones. This holds both in terms of linear and k-NN classification performance on ImageNet and on a series of downstream tasks tested. We view the LocaLeJEPA formalism as a principled approach to the JEPA paradigm that better respects intrinsic data geometry while also accommodating generalizations to exotic embedding geometries. Code available at https://github.com/alessioborgi/LocaLeJEPA.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kartik Tandon, Alessio Borgi, Pavel Snopov, Inés García-Redondo, Davide D'Ascenzo, Sebastiano Cultrera di Montesano, Fabrizio Silvestri, Pietro Liò, Francesca Dominici, Randall Balestriero, Claudio Battiloro. 2026-10-20. LocaLeJEPA: Maximum Entropy Representations under Geometric Priors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28458

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Limits of Post-Selection Generalization

While statistics and machine learning offer numerous methods for ensuring generalization, these methods often fail in the presence of adaptivity---the common practice in which the choice of analysis depends on previous interactions with the same dataset. A recent line of work has introduced powerful, general purpose algorithms that ensure post hoc generalization (also called robust or post-selection generalization), which says that, given the output of the algorithm, it is hard to find any statistic for which the data differs significantly from the population it came from. In this work we show several limitations on the power of algorithms satisfying post hoc generalization. First, we show a tight lower bound on the error of any algorithm that satisfies post hoc generalization and answers adaptively chosen statistical queries, showing a strong barrier to progress in post selection data analysis. Second, we show that post hoc generalization is not closed under composition, despite many examples of such algorithms exhibiting strong composition properties.

cs.LG↗

Quantifying Symptom Causality in Clinical Decision Making: An Exploration Using CausaLM

Current machine learning approaches to medical diagnosis often rely on correlational patterns between symptoms and diseases, risking misdiagnoses when symptoms are ambiguous or common across multiple conditions. In this work, we move beyond correlation to investigate the causal influence of key symptoms-specifically "chest pain" on diagnostic predictions. Leveraging the CausaLM framework, we generate counterfactual text representations in which target concepts are effectively "forgotten" enabling a principled estimation of the causal effect of that concept on a model's predicted disease distribution. By employing Textual Representation-based Average Treatment Effect (TReATE), we quantify how the presence or absence of a symptom shapes the model's diagnostic outcomes, and contrast these findings against correlation-based baselines such as CONEXP. Our results offer deeper insight into the decision-making behavior of clinical NLP models and have the potential to inform more trustworthy, interpretable, and causally-grounded decision support tools in medical practice.

cs.LG↗

Understanding and Mitigating Under-Confidence in GNNs from the Final Layer

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness on graph-based tasks. However, their predictive confidence is often miscalibrated, typically exhibiting under-confidence, which harms the reliability of their decisions. Existing calibration methods for GNNs normally introduce additional calibration components, which fail to capture the intrinsic relationship between the model and the prediction confidence, resulting in limited theoretical guarantees and increased computational overhead. To address this issue, we propose a simple yet efficient graph calibration method. We establish a unified theoretical framework revealing that model confidence is jointly governed by class-centroid-level and node-level calibration at the final layer. Based on this insight, we theoretically show that reducing the weight decay of the final-layer parameters alleviates GNN under-confidence by acting on the class-centroid level, while node-level calibration acts as a finer-grained complement to class-centroid-level calibration, which encourages each test node to be closer to its predicted class prototype in the final-layer representations. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of our method. The code is released at https://github.com/huangJC0429/SCAR.

cs.LG↗