Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.29199

Motivation and Contribution in Open Source Software: A Meta-Analytic Investigation

Parisa Omidmand·Saeed Nosratabadi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Research on why people contribute to open source software (OSS) and related open collaboration platforms spans more than two decades, but its findings conflict, and studies often treat the work people contribute and their intention to keep contributing as interchangeable. Drawing on self-determination theory and motivation crowding theory, we meta-analyze 41 studies. The main analysis pools 178 correlations of eight antecedents with contribution effort and continuance intention from 29 independent samples (N = 9,632). Seven antecedents relate positively to effort, all eight relate positively to intention, and each relates at least as strongly to intention as to effort. Contrary to a common assumption, intrinsic motivation is not more strongly related to effort than extrinsic motivation, but its gap between intention and effort is larger. Reputation relates to effort mainly on platforms with a reputation system, and we find no sign that monetary rewards crowd out enjoyment. The findings inform how platforms can turn contributors' intentions into work.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNcs.HCcs.SEq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Parisa Omidmand, Saeed Nosratabadi. 2026-10-21. Motivation and Contribution in Open Source Software: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29199

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Playing Against the Machine: Cooperation, Communication, and Strategy Heterogeneity in Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma

We study whether communication sustains cooperation when the partner is an artificial intelligence. In a laboratory experiment (n = 234), human participants play indefinitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma games against an AI chatbot (GPT-5.2) under one of three conditions: no communication, free-form chat before the first round of each supergame, or free-form chat before every round. A fourth treatment replaces the AI with another participant under the every-round protocol. Communication is the main determinant of cooperation with the AI, and a single exchange is enough: pre-play chat raises cooperation from 49% to 84%, while chatting before every round adds less than one percentage point, in contrast to the timing effect found between humans. Once communication is available, cooperation with the AI is no lower than with a human partner, so we find no evidence of the 'machine penalty' documented in the psychology literature. The partner's identity nonetheless shifts strategies: under identical communication, participants tend to reciprocate against a human but to cooperate unconditionally against the AI. Participants also keep their promises to cooperate while carrying out their threats to punish only about half the time. The AI opens cooperatively and rarely defects first, so these differences originate on the human side.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Climate-Driven Supply-Demand Matching Reshapes Global SolarEV Decarbonization Potential

Rooftop photovoltaics (PV) can support rapid urban decarbonization, but their contribution is constrained by the imbalance between PV generation and demand, both shaped by local climate. Growing urban electric-vehicle (EV) deployment creates distributed storage near rooftop PV, shifting PV electricity across time. Here we simulate rooftop PV integrated with EVs as batteries across 5,000 grid cells globally, using hourly meteorology and climate-induced demand. We find that PV-EV systems can supply up to 84% of annual building and mobility electricity demand. Self-sufficiency is highest where daytime demand aligns with generation and seasonal variability remains limited. Using PV capacity factor alone to screen PV-EV potential undervalues 21.9% of the world's 1,000 most populous cities because generation-side metrics overlook the temporal coupling of PV generation, electricity demand and EV storage. Substantial PV-EV potential is concentrated in many low-latitude cities, offering a pathway to cleaner urban energy systems while accelerating progress towards carbon neutrality.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Tradeoffs and Comparison Complexity

Using theory and experiments, this paper shows that the difficulty of making tradeoffs offers a parsimonious explanation for a wide range of behavioral phenomena. We develop a model of imprecise comparisons applicable to multiattribute, lottery, and intertemporal choice, which formalizes the idea that comparisons are difficult when they involve pronounced tradeoffs. The model rationalizes a range of documented regularities, such as context effects, preference reversals, apparent probability weighting and hyperbolic discounting, and generates new implications for behavior. We assess the explanatory power of our model in a series of choice experiments. Our model explains a large share of the variation in choice inconsistency across problems, and we document that manipulating tradeoffs reverses classic behavioral regularities, in line with its predictions.

econ.GN↗